If a lady does not allow DATY, should that affect her TER score? I noticed it's not listed in the "above 7" scoring criteria. But many men really enjoy DATY so if she doesn't allow that, seems a 9 or 10 score may not be warranted (while "only CBJ" does limit her score) . Thoughts?

If you look at the "services provided" part of any review, the review must indicate whether "touch pussy" "on the inside" and "lick pussy" are available. These are some of the acts included in the grading advice which refers to the fact that a score can only be a maximum of 7 unless further acts (which are specified) were provided.
I agree it's not terribly clear though.

Disappointed she didn't offer DATY, give her a 6, or a 5, or....whatever you feel she deserves. Got a bbbj but it was lame, you don't have to give a +1.

BBJ + DFK is eligible for the exact same max score as BBJ + DFK + vaginal sex.

I don’t think it should automatically count. You wanted DATY and you were disappointed. You should make it count. Another guy may not even want DATY and it shouldn’t mean the lady automatically gets a strike, especially if it is on her menu. But this is my gripe about the current grading system. Ladies who offer services get lower scores when clients don’t want said services.

clients have railed at TER to change the system for more than a decade on main and on the suggestion and policy board. Deaf ears, and the TER trundles right along unchanged.

I posted about it a lot back when they made the changes to require certain activities in each session (not just generally offered).  

that the points earned above a 7 are for services the lady provides the customer, not for things the customer does to her.  As you say, between the drop-down lists and the review narrative, we can always learn if DATY is available.

services performed by the provider to the client, not the client to the provider.  

I have seen some reviews get tens when a lady with a strap-on or TS provider pegged (fucked) the client and it was clear that it was counted towards anal.

The customer is the one paying, the provider is getting paid.  Only the services she provides should count towards scoring.  While one could argue that in both DATY and Anal the provider is the "receiver", they are completely different activities unless DATY makes your tongue hard and you involuntarily spit at the end.  

My latest review states Greek & TER failed to give me an extra point for anal. This happens periodically. Idk who reads and approves the reviews, but I deserve a 10/10. I worked hard AF for 3 hours of adult erotic fantasy fun!

Since when is pegging that she provides not a service she's getting paid for? Giving or receiving has nothing to do with it.

They just allow it. The reviewer has to give you a 10. Are you saying the reviewer did and it was declined?

This is not the first time this has happened to me. It happened 6 months ago & TER fixed the mistake. I'm not sure who the mods are that  decrease on their own accord & adjust it after being called out. I know he gave me a 10/10 that's a fact. I just want what's right. I earned a 10/10. It's not easy to exceed expectations when you're on a FMTY for the fourth encounter. 🤦🏽‍♀️

I think it's a service she can provide just like a massage after a BBBJ, but not one that deserves a potential extra point, just like DATY.   The BBBJ raises the potential score, but the massage doesn't.  A BBBJ is worth an increase in the max score, your brown-eye being expanded by a provider wearing a strap-on should not be worth anything extra.  You can also buy an hour for her to read poetry to you naked but that's not worth anything extra as well.  

I’m guessing the admin missed the trip to Greece. If they interpreted the ass fisting as his anal claim, I can see that not counting. But it’s on the reviewer to make it clear and push back, not you. I have had admin question my reviews and I always take the initiative to explain. They will sometimes ask the reviewer to edit the review to clarify. But I have had some success.

Yes the reviewer made it clear that a "trip to Greece" was experienced and it was unrelated to whatever was done to him.