If a lady does not allow DATY, should that affect her TER score? I noticed it's not listed in the "above 7" scoring criteria. But many men really enjoy DATY so if she doesn't allow that, seems a 9 or 10 score may not be warranted (while "only CBJ" does limit her score) . Thoughts?

As an aside, I noticed recently some stellar scores for a provider but they didn't explicitly note the "no DATY" experience she had (FYI she didn't have a website with a list of don'ts) .

If you look at the "services provided" part of any review, the review must indicate whether "touch pussy" "on the inside" and "lick pussy" are available. These are some of the acts included in the grading advice which refers to the fact that a score can only be a maximum of 7 unless further acts (which are specified) were provided.
I agree it's not terribly clear though.

END OF MESSAGE

Disappointed she didn't offer DATY, give her a 6, or a 5, or....whatever you feel she deserves. Got a bbbj but it was lame, you don't have to give a +1.

 
OTOH, if she's a great passionate kisser and can bbbj like no other, then she fucked your brains out, and you don't care about DATY, no reason not to give her a 9.

Get it?

BBJ + DFK is eligible for the exact same max score as BBJ + DFK + vaginal sex.

That is ridiculous.

The scoring system needs a major overhaul to reflect what the majority of clients actually enjoy and seek out, but that will only happen when enough clients push for it.

I don’t think it should automatically count. You wanted DATY and you were disappointed. You should make it count. Another guy may not even want DATY and it shouldn’t mean the lady automatically gets a strike, especially if it is on her menu. But this is my gripe about the current grading system. Ladies who offer services get lower scores when clients don’t want said services.

clients have railed at TER to change the system for more than a decade on main and on the suggestion and policy board. Deaf ears, and the TER trundles right along unchanged.

I posted about it a lot back when they made the changes to require certain activities in each session (not just generally offered).  

 
I pulled away from the site for a bit back when they made the changes, then I spent time in a long term arrangement. I was surprised to see the same system in play when I returned. It just doesn't match what real clients are seeking. How many clients want to bring a male friend along for a session? (More than one guy +1) Most clients would NOT want that, so why is it a +1?

 
I have not yet seen a strong push by clients to make changes to the rating system. I think that is because many clients aren't aware of the issues like vaginal intercourse not giving +1 to a potential max score, or the fact that it is now impossible to rate a 1 on 1 encounter a performance "10" without doing anal during that session, even if a provider fulfills a client's ultimate fantasy. Clients who do not like anal are not allowed to rate a 1 on 1 session a performance 10.

 
I keep a positive outlook, so I think there's a chance admin may consider changes if clients push for them. Afterall, it is clients who write the reviews, and who pay for most memberships to read reviews.

that the points earned above a 7 are for services the lady provides the customer, not for things the customer does to her.  As you say, between the drop-down lists and the review narrative, we can always learn if DATY is available.

services performed by the provider to the client, not the client to the provider.  

Now I guess uncovered DATY performed by the provider to a female client could be considered as bbbj for scoring criteria points.

I love to DATY.  If the provider didn't seem into it or not really allow it, then I noted it in the review and would not see them again. I'd also limit their score to an 8 max.