If you look at the "services provided" part of any review, the review must indicate whether "touch pussy" "on the inside" and "lick pussy" are available. These are some of the acts included in the grading advice which refers to the fact that a score can only be a maximum of 7 unless further acts (which are specified) were provided.
I agree it's not terribly clear though.
If a lady does not allow DATY, should that affect her TER score? I noticed it's not listed in the "above 7" scoring criteria. But many men really enjoy DATY so if she doesn't allow that, seems a 9 or 10 score may not be warranted (while "only CBJ" does limit her score) . Thoughts?
As an aside, I noticed recently some stellar scores for a provider but they didn't explicitly note the "no DATY" experience she had (FYI she didn't have a website with a list of don'ts) .
If you look at the "services provided" part of any review, the review must indicate whether "touch pussy" "on the inside" and "lick pussy" are available. These are some of the acts included in the grading advice which refers to the fact that a score can only be a maximum of 7 unless further acts (which are specified) were provided.
I agree it's not terribly clear though.
that the points earned above a 7 are for services the lady provides the customer, not for things the customer does to her. As you say, between the drop-down lists and the review narrative, we can always learn if DATY is available.
Disappointed she didn't offer DATY, give her a 6, or a 5, or....whatever you feel she deserves. Got a bbbj but it was lame, you don't have to give a +1.
OTOH, if she's a great passionate kisser and can bbbj like no other, then she fucked your brains out, and you don't care about DATY, no reason not to give her a 9.
Get it?
BBJ + DFK is eligible for the exact same max score as BBJ + DFK + vaginal sex.
That is ridiculous.
The scoring system needs a major overhaul to reflect what the majority of clients actually enjoy and seek out, but that will only happen when enough clients push for it.
clients have railed at TER to change the system for more than a decade on main and on the suggestion and policy board. Deaf ears, and the TER trundles right along unchanged.
I posted about it a lot back when they made the changes to require certain activities in each session (not just generally offered).
I pulled away from the site for a bit back when they made the changes, then I spent time in a long term arrangement. I was surprised to see the same system in play when I returned. It just doesn't match what real clients are seeking. How many clients want to bring a male friend along for a session? (More than one guy +1) Most clients would NOT want that, so why is it a +1?
I have not yet seen a strong push by clients to make changes to the rating system. I think that is because many clients aren't aware of the issues like vaginal intercourse not giving +1 to a potential max score, or the fact that it is now impossible to rate a 1 on 1 encounter a performance "10" without doing anal during that session, even if a provider fulfills a client's ultimate fantasy. Clients who do not like anal are not allowed to rate a 1 on 1 session a performance 10.
I keep a positive outlook, so I think there's a chance admin may consider changes if clients push for them. Afterall, it is clients who write the reviews, and who pay for most memberships to read reviews.
I don’t think it should automatically count. You wanted DATY and you were disappointed. You should make it count. Another guy may not even want DATY and it shouldn’t mean the lady automatically gets a strike, especially if it is on her menu. But this is my gripe about the current grading system. Ladies who offer services get lower scores when clients don’t want said services.
services performed by the provider to the client, not the client to the provider.
Now I guess uncovered DATY performed by the provider to a female client could be considered as bbbj for scoring criteria points.
I love to DATY. If the provider didn't seem into it or not really allow it, then I noted it in the review and would not see them again. I'd also limit their score to an 8 max.
I have seen some reviews get tens when a lady with a strap-on or TS provider pegged (fucked) the client and it was clear that it was counted towards anal.
My latest review states Greek & TER failed to give me an extra point for anal. This happens periodically. Idk who reads and approves the reviews, but I deserve a 10/10. I worked hard AF for 3 hours of adult erotic fantasy fun!
I honestly believe the system was geared towards who created TER the founding Father's. When I started escorting everything I offered was safe no risks because I did not offer BBBJ, CIM, DFK, Anal, GFE & PSE. I did offer FBSM & BDSM no extra points for pegging, or fisting. I wish I knew about the scoring system when I started my career & profile here on TER. I believe those that are hip to the lingo and scoring guidelines are at an advantage.
They just allow it. The reviewer has to give you a 10. Are you saying the reviewer did and it was declined?
This is not the first time this has happened to me. It happened 6 months ago & TER fixed the mistake. I'm not sure who the mods are that decrease on their own accord & adjust it after being called out. I know he gave me a 10/10 that's a fact. I just want what's right. I earned a 10/10. It's not easy to exceed expectations when you're on a FMTY for the fourth encounter. 🤦🏽♀️
I’m guessing the admin missed the trip to Greece. If they interpreted the ass fisting as his anal claim, I can see that not counting. But it’s on the reviewer to make it clear and push back, not you. I have had admin question my reviews and I always take the initiative to explain. They will sometimes ask the reviewer to edit the review to clarify. But I have had some success.
Yes the reviewer made it clear that a "trip to Greece" was experienced and it was unrelated to whatever was done to him.
Both QB and the client should make a complaint about it to get it corrected.
The customer is the one paying, the provider is getting paid. Only the services she provides should count towards scoring. While one could argue that in both DATY and Anal the provider is the "receiver", they are completely different activities unless DATY makes your tongue hard and you involuntarily spit at the end.
Since when is pegging that she provides not a service she's getting paid for? Giving or receiving has nothing to do with it.
I think it's a service she can provide just like a massage after a BBBJ, but not one that deserves a potential extra point, just like DATY. The BBBJ raises the potential score, but the massage doesn't. A BBBJ is worth an increase in the max score, your brown-eye being expanded by a provider wearing a strap-on should not be worth anything extra. You can also buy an hour for her to read poetry to you naked but that's not worth anything extra as well.
You posted yourself recently that they are selling time, and the way they USE that time, under the TER reviewing guidelines, determines how many maximum points what she did was worth. Pegging does not even require her to take off her clothes, so how can that be the same as her letting you into the back door with a little lube? (Okay, a lot of lube in some cases.)
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
