1- B- stats: Gee, a little hard to fit an A+ statistical analysis in a blog post. As I've frequently admitted, sure, a rough comparison. But where there's smoke, there's fire. You are quibbling that I've not shown the perfectly precise odds of fire given x quantity, temperature, fuel conditions etc of smoke. OK, quibble granted, larger point stands, as you actually grant. Interesting definition of misinformed.
2- Rude and without cause, pimple on a face, dick move: there have been multiple self righteous posts on this forum listing out each and every girl who screens by race, complaining how this is very wrong and bad and for no good reason and a girl doesn't even have this right! Add on the national whining and cop shooting, based on bogus stats, like Ferguson etc, and I pitched in. Scroll down, you'll find I started this track on the end of one such screed.
Does everyone see the pimple? Golly, another earnest voice of authority guy said he reads stats all day professionally and if you eliminate drug crime stats, the per capita ratio black to white would be, he estimated, 1 to 1! Another guy said Per Capita is a bogus concept, and whites are the most dangerous! Another said cite the sources, its all just lies! Seems some have actually believed the false picture the media generally portray.
I say I'm pointing out the concealed oozing pustules on the dick move, jerk guys loud mouthing at the party.
3- Better Methods to Screen: Gee, you are quite right, as I've also said frequently. Individual data beats group averages every time, most black men aren't robbers, murderser, infected with STD's etc. BUT, not all girls individually screen. The BP girls who tend to be poorer and more marginal (judging from prices, website sophistication, hotels used) also relatedly don't screen individually. These also happen to be the girls who screen by race, and the girls most vulnerable to assault. As I've also said many times, I'm not telling anyone to screen by race, I'm saying the girls who do are using a rational method to protect themselves (given their market niche).
4- I've seen girls who've seen black guys? Gosh, really? oh dear, guess I'll have to turn in my Klan and Nazi uniforms and cut off my member.
5- you may see only the $500 hr elite courtesans on here, and so picture the black guys on here as all like you and in that tier. There are dudes of all races on this forum who don't fit that frame, and an $80 quick isn't beyond the reach of many a low life.
But is there a purpose to your post? You don't need to warn fellow hobbyists as any semi-knowlegeable person should already be familiar with the gist of your post. If you are trying to tell providers how to screen their clients based on your data, then you are only focusing on the kind of providers you see regularly based on your review history: low-end BP girls. In the BP world, maybe there is some truth to your statistics. But most well-reviewed TER providers already know the facts and will screen based more than just race. You can bet they wil see a respectful, clean, well-behaved AA gentleman who has good references and/or P411 OKs, and reject a redneck racist who is white (not naming names).