Washington DC

Re: Premium
pedxing 85 Reviews 1235 reads
posted
2 / 16

new girl in town. did anybody see her? waiting for mini.

johnnyj123 28 Reviews 343 reads
posted
3 / 16
Generaltao 761 reads
posted
4 / 16

I've been using egc for couple of years and they never asked for premium donation.The original crews were extremely hot Londyn, Alexis Hilton,Kim kadash etc. I hope Rachel is worth the premium admission .I am sure mini will be here soon.

gwd1980 4 Reviews 547 reads
posted
5 / 16

She looks stunning. If anyone sees her please report. Does she have any reviews from previous work?

JazzCrusaderII 58 Reviews 422 reads
posted
6 / 16

Posted By: Generaltao
I've been using egc for couple of years and they never asked for premium donation.The original crews were extremely hot Londyn, Alexis Hilton,Kim kadash etc. I hope Rachel is worth the premium admission .I am sure mini will be here soon.
I am reading this by cell phone so i may be wrong but i do not see a reference to a premium. Am I missing something?

Nautilus5711 156 Reviews 324 reads
posted
7 / 16

Check out below post by egc. 3.5 vs normal 30.

Nautilus5711 156 Reviews 335 reads
posted
8 / 16

@3.5 I hope she's as hot as her photos and performance to match it. I am waiting for mini from credible reviewers first before I pull a trigger.

iluv2bluvd 27 Reviews 349 reads
posted
9 / 16

It is not their usual practice, but EGC has been known to charge rates higher than $$$ in the past, including for Londyn I believe (after she had established herself).

bnk1999 25 Reviews 397 reads
posted
10 / 16

Yeah Kim Kardash started at 3 then went up to 3.5.  Elite is a VERY good agency IMHO so I have a good feeling she will be worth it.

Posted By: iluv2bluvd
It is not their usual practice, but EGC has been known to charge rates higher than $$$ in the past, including for Londyn I believe (after she had established herself).

tomcat0360 105 Reviews 777 reads
posted
11 / 16

Saw her this morning. She looks as good as her pics; truly model material. Performance was pure GF. 9/9+ in my book. No anal (she told me) and not sure about CIM or MSOG (I finished in the cover and am an one-popper at my advanced age) but everything else was on the menu.

I didn't feel like writing a mini since I already submitted a review. TER is very fast these days in posting reviews plus she told me she will be here for a while before going to NYC to try to get a modeling gig. She's also thinking about moving here which will be great for DC mongers.

l1mpl3g 66 Reviews 407 reads
posted
12 / 16
Nautilus5711 156 Reviews 394 reads
posted
13 / 16

I agree with java but I would rated 1 point lower to 8/8.I am not a big fan of fake hard boobs. My appointment was 45 minutes late but overall still a good time. I am not sure about repeat at 3.5 so many choices out there.

marcman112001 28 Reviews 533 reads
posted
14 / 16

Hey - friends same here at 3.5 she better be really good - and if not providing anal - she is not in the same league as their other providers. and CIM - not GFE - period.

She has bolt on's and looks like she is really into herself - please help me to understand here?

Thanks, MM

-- Modified on 8/20/2011 11:25:53 AM

marcman112001 28 Reviews 531 reads
posted
15 / 16

agree with this man 100% - way to expensive for a list of cant or wont do's.

The rest of the EGC staff performs as advertised - so why pay more? For the model looks> and the bolt on tits - no thanks.

just me 2 cents.

MM

marcman112001 28 Reviews 272 reads
posted
16 / 16

Hey - right -

Why charge more upfront before the reports on perfromance are in??? Does not seem right to me.

Thx, MM

Register Now!