Washington DC

Re: Premiumsad_smile
marcman112001 28 Reviews 273 reads
posted

Hey - right -

Why charge more upfront before the reports on perfromance are in??? Does not seem right to me.

Thx, MM

new girl in town. did anybody see her? waiting for mini.

Generaltao762 reads

I've been using egc for couple of years and they never asked for premium donation.The original crews were extremely hot Londyn, Alexis Hilton,Kim kadash etc. I hope Rachel is worth the premium admission .I am sure mini will be here soon.

Posted By: Generaltao
I've been using egc for couple of years and they never asked for premium donation.The original crews were extremely hot Londyn, Alexis Hilton,Kim kadash etc. I hope Rachel is worth the premium admission .I am sure mini will be here soon.
I am reading this by cell phone so i may be wrong but i do not see a reference to a premium. Am I missing something?

Check out below post by egc. 3.5 vs normal 30.

@3.5 I hope she's as hot as her photos and performance to match it. I am waiting for mini from credible reviewers first before I pull a trigger.

Hey - friends same here at 3.5 she better be really good - and if not providing anal - she is not in the same league as their other providers. and CIM - not GFE - period.

She has bolt on's and looks like she is really into herself - please help me to understand here?

Thanks, MM

-- Modified on 8/20/2011 11:25:53 AM

It is not their usual practice, but EGC has been known to charge rates higher than $$$ in the past, including for Londyn I believe (after she had established herself).

Yeah Kim Kardash started at 3 then went up to 3.5.  Elite is a VERY good agency IMHO so I have a good feeling she will be worth it.

Posted By: iluv2bluvd
It is not their usual practice, but EGC has been known to charge rates higher than $$$ in the past, including for Londyn I believe (after she had established herself).

Hey - right -

Why charge more upfront before the reports on perfromance are in??? Does not seem right to me.

Thx, MM

She looks stunning. If anyone sees her please report. Does she have any reviews from previous work?

Saw her this morning. She looks as good as her pics; truly model material. Performance was pure GF. 9/9+ in my book. No anal (she told me) and not sure about CIM or MSOG (I finished in the cover and am an one-popper at my advanced age) but everything else was on the menu.

I didn't feel like writing a mini since I already submitted a review. TER is very fast these days in posting reviews plus she told me she will be here for a while before going to NYC to try to get a modeling gig. She's also thinking about moving here which will be great for DC mongers.

I agree with java but I would rated 1 point lower to 8/8.I am not a big fan of fake hard boobs. My appointment was 45 minutes late but overall still a good time. I am not sure about repeat at 3.5 so many choices out there.

agree with this man 100% - way to expensive for a list of cant or wont do's.

The rest of the EGC staff performs as advertised - so why pay more? For the model looks> and the bolt on tits - no thanks.

just me 2 cents.

MM

Register Now!