3 guys who pay me by the month to see them x amount of times, but it is not enough to totally quit and I do have another gig too. I think what most escorts don't realize is that true SDs, want nothing to do with us lol. They already know our mentality and that we are not naive, so they like the coeds who will fk them 4 times a month for a cable bill.

I get that too, London. But it's not the same thing. You hit the nail on the head about the SD thing, lol. That's what confuses me. A real SB/SD is truly exclusive, as is a real mistress situation (at least to my understanding it is). And sorry, any coed SB (or ANY SB for that matter) who's getting it in like that for the cable bill is crazy. That's STILL a hooker on retainer. Just at a cheaper rate and MAYBE a little less mileage, lol.

Hooker fks 4 guys a week at one or two hours at a time...SB might fk one guy, but the hours her vagina is being used are about triple and she makes a tenth of the money. I have tried to school them, but I can't save em all bwahahaha. These girls are doing full on overnights for less than 500 bucks! WTF...I can make that at Walmart!

Yes you are correct...truly exclusive connotes one on one, but "entertaining SD arrangements" means she is trying to land one lol.

-- Modified on 8/14/2012 12:03:30 AM

It's the guys who are going to be exclusive because they're giving all their money to the girl...

and a lot of them are doing BBFS with their sugar daddy on top of it. In my experience the vast majority of guys claiming to be sugar daddies are nothing more than bargain hunters.

on the woman's part, not his.

She will not have more than "one" hence the term exclusive. Problem is - can you ever really be sure

And, they're usually the most generous!!!!!!  If you can find a married SD willing to support you:
DO IT!!!!!

health insurance, private school for the little one, and utilities I don't have a lot of bills. Add food, gas, and smokes, and we are up there though. I have learned to spend wisely lately, because the economy really does suck for everyone. I am in the wrong area to be a full-time hooker, which is why I am not lol.

I am married and have done the whole SB thing before several times and from my limited experience it is a complete fiasco.  First, it takes effort to set up ground rules and trying to lay them out is easier said then done.Plus you don't know who you are getting involved with, the stability of the sb mentally, what she really expects, etc etc.  Things start off pretty cool with eye candy on your arm until you decide this is getting old, then what?  Do you think the sbs are really cool with just ending it..ahh the mess it causes.  All for what? Perceived exclusiveness? Perceived less risks? Plus a civvie may think its all about the green but in my experience it becomes more...SB FAIL.  Ill stick to SPs, sure there are still risks but I think they are mitigated...I know what they are out for and that's perfectly ok with me.

Bah. That arrangement's not for me. I am too poly-sexual. (Now I could do a frequent flyers thing like London, because then I wouldn't have to be exclusive and neither would they.)

If I wanted an exclusive encounter,I'd have a boyfriend!
This type of arrangement rarely works out for either party longer than 6 months.
It's way more difficult than it should be as we are dealing with humans who are not always a perfect science. If it sounds too good to be true, it just might be!

your usual good advice and better manners are prevailing here!

-- Modified on 8/15/2012 1:26:42 AM

My monthly exclusive rate is $5,000.  Consider this.

*Rent $1800
*Health Insurance $600
*Auto/Renter's Insurance $125
*Dental Insurance $130
*Gas/oil/maintenance - varies
*Tuition $500
*Food $600

Etc etc etc

So, really, $5,000 is a minimum.  Note that I support my two children solely.

xo

I'd love to have just one guy who was my SD.  I have fun with my regulars, and there's a reason why I run my business a certain way.  I charge more so I can see fewer gentlemen, and give them a better experience.  Also, less chance of getting in trouble with LE.  I do NOT want problems, not legal and not health issues, as in STDs.  

xo