TER General Board

Thin crust tonight
sympathyforthedevil 57 Reviews 2210 reads
posted
1 / 28

Obviously we have an obesity problem in the U.S. .  So providers. What percentage of your clients are over weight. My guess is 80% because a lot of us are old farts who haven't lowered their eating habits as they got older and less active.

For hobbyist, what percentage of providers are overweight. Both from who you have seen and what your guess is overall from pics and advertisements and reviews.

I'd guess for me it's under 20% for the ladies I've seen and 60% overall. Just a guess

jaydalee See my TER Reviews 985 reads
posted
2 / 28

I see a lot of gents who are older but I would not say that 80% are overweight.
I would say less than 20% are overweight.Funny,I meet many older gents that are in excellent shape they run marathons or work out regularly.When I comment about how their body looks like they are in great shape some will say"Oh I am trying to lose some weight or I need to get my stomach down"
I am looking and thinking to myself what weight?
I have seen gents who were closer to my age that were out of shape or did not work out at all

lungman 10 Reviews 801 reads
posted
3 / 28

must be bored.
Yawn!!!

Vivianna Love See my TER Reviews 785 reads
posted
4 / 28

I don't know about anyone else.... My clientel: Doctors, Attorneys, CEOS, business men that DO take great care of looks and health... Oh' and I love A WELL DRESSED MAN.hehehe
Being fit or aware of our eating habits,  It's a life style.  More so than looks.  But sad for those that don't take it seriously. Its a health issue!

Your speaking about the obesity in our world?  Hmmm. Sad but true... On here well, some men are attracted to some fat.... so thats their choice.

Obesity. The word weighs heavily on a national scale. According to the most recent statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a whopping 78 million adults—more than a third of the U.S. population—are obese. And Eric Braverman, M.D., founder of the New York neurology practice PATH Medical and a clinical assistant professor of integrative medicine at Weill Cornell Medical School, says that a more accurate number could be up to twice that amount.

BossMonger 753 reads
posted
5 / 28

I've seen one fat provider...  

I'm in great shape and love hearing it from the ladies...  And how big my cock is and how they should pay me for fucking them lol.

isawonereview 674 reads
posted
6 / 28

you can tell the over weight providers if they have their hand/arm/pillow/sheets covering their mid-section and stomach in the portfolio of pic's. a quick gander at the last 3 pages of ad's in the Chi-town area and i'd guess that percentage is about 50%.

Dr Who revived 572 reads
posted
7 / 28

The food options are second to none in the Second  City.

You try and keep the fucking weight off with the Italian Beef, Polish sausage, deep dish pizzas.

At least you kept that estimate on the low side  :D
Posted By: isawonereview
you can tell the over weight providers if they have their hand/arm/pillow/sheets covering their mid-section and stomach in the portfolio of pic's. a quick gander at the last 3 pages of ad's in the Chi-town area and i'd guess that percentage is about 50%.

Businesses 22 Reviews 801 reads
posted
8 / 28

As of May 17, 2013 at 5:30pm PST:

Total number of active provider TER IDs: 168,394 (found by searching all countries and all cities)
Average: 32,868
Skinny: 12,724
Thin: 41,310
Athletic: 42,670
Very muscular: 693
Baby fat: 21,933
Flabby: 8,292
Heavy: 4,935
Very fat: 740

If overweight = average + baby fat + flabby + heavy + very fat, total number = 68,768
68,768/168,394 = 40.8375% of providers are "overweight"

Not including average build, total numbers = 35,900
35,900/168,394 = 21.319% of providers are "overweight"

Depends if you consider "average" overweight or not.

One problem with this data: doubles profiles are included (can't really filter them out)
Posted By: sympathyforthedevil
Obviously we have an obesity problem in the U.S. .  So providers. What percentage of your clients are over weight. My guess is 80% because a lot of us are old farts who haven't lowered their eating habits as they got older and less active.  
   
 For hobbyist, what percentage of providers are overweight. Both from who you have seen and what your guess is overall from pics and advertisements and reviews.  
   
 I'd guess for me it's under 20% for the ladies I've seen and 60% overall. Just a guess.  
   
 

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 574 reads
posted
9 / 28

...interesting that there are 168,000 active TER providers.  TER is issuing ID nos. around the 230,000 mark now.  That means that 60,000 providers (over 25%) are no longer active (including duplicate profiles).  I guess there would be a certain amount of attrition over the course of 14 years.

GaGambler 733 reads
posted
10 / 28

If you will take a look at many of the providers listed as "athletic" you will find a huge percentage of them are overweight as well, which could up the percentages up to well over 60%.

Personally speaking I doubt that even 10% of the providers I have seen have been overweight, but I have no qualms about walking out the door without so much as a good bye if a lady misrepresents herself to me.

As for the guys, after attending several M&G's I think the majority of "hobbyists" are overweight" nothing like a M&G to make a guy feel good about his appearance. lol

Businesses 22 Reviews 673 reads
posted
11 / 28

As Big P mentioned, there could be duplicate profiles that aren't combined yet.
And the total number of IDs include those from over a decade ago.

Another problem is the accuracy of reporting the build.
Were the reviewers honest when describing the provider's build?

Also, if a provider has her reviews linked, she can change the build I think.

I'm going to try this again but only include providers with 10 or more reviews as an attempt to filter out "some" of the double reviews and also filter out the profiles with 1-9 reviews.
Posted By: GaGambler
If you will take a look at many of the providers listed as "athletic" you will find a huge percentage of them are overweight as well, which could up the percentages up to well over 60%.

Personally speaking I doubt that even 10% of the providers I have seen have been overweight, but I have no qualms about walking out the door without so much as a good bye if a lady misrepresents herself to me.

As for the guys, after attending several M&G's I think the majority of "hobbyists" are overweight" nothing like a M&G to make a guy feel good about his appearance. lol

HangingwithBears 625 reads
posted
12 / 28

But I really do need to get my stomach down, lol...

HangingwithBears 723 reads
posted
13 / 28

We have great food here and it's literally irresistible. If you're from Chicago, a good way to lose weight is move to LA. You won't find anything you like there and voila, off comes the weight :-)

HangingwithBears 548 reads
posted
14 / 28

Now I have a fcking pizza in the oven, you had to bring that up didn't you! Damn it!

Dr Who revived 509 reads
posted
15 / 28

Or thin crust?

Posted By: Polish_Pirate
Now I have a fcking pizza in the oven, you had to bring that up didn't you! Damn it!

Businesses 22 Reviews 599 reads
posted
16 / 28

16,828 matches for providers with >=10 reviews in all countries and all cities

Average: 3,046
Skinny: 964
Thin: 4,879
Athletic: 5,499
Very muscular: 41
Baby fat: 1,554
Flabby: 277
Heavy: 304
Very fat: 16
Other: 248

Forgot to include "other" in the previous search. Not sure how to judge that.
I'll leave it out of both the numerator and denominator this time.

Total number of provider IDs with 10 or more reviews (not including "other" build type): 16,580

Skinny + thin + athletic + very muscular = 11,383
11,383/16,580 = 68.655%  

1 - 68.55% = ~31.344% of providers are not considered skinny/thin/athletic/very muscular.

If you were to exclude "average" build from being considered "overweight," the percentage of "overweight" would then be:
12.973% (with 10 or more reviews from all countries and cities).

Again, the accuracy of the provider's build is important and the numbers are based off of what was inputted at the time.

Lots of ways to play with the data.
More accurate than guesstimating, that's for sure.
Posted By: sympathyforthedevil
Obviously we have an obesity problem in the U.S. .  So providers. What percentage of your clients are over weight. My guess is 80% because a lot of us are old farts who haven't lowered their eating habits as they got older and less active.  
   
 For hobbyist, what percentage of providers are overweight. Both from who you have seen and what your guess is overall from pics and advertisements and reviews.  
   
 I'd guess for me it's under 20% for the ladies I've seen and 60% overall. Just a guess.  
   
 

Dr Who revived 634 reads
posted
17 / 28

Assuming that active is a hooker that is still showing up on TER.

You can knock that in half as an estimate.  I could easily go through my local Top 100 alone and knock out close to 50 as they are no longer hooking.

And at least 35% of the hookers I saw over the past three or so years here are gone.

I will suggest that using the data base as it is to determine how fat the overall hookers are is not real here....as the 1st reviewer sets the mark.  And if a hooker has been around for a couple of years...she may now not just be "athletic"....she's just a fatty.  Good luck getting the fatty hooker to allow TER, or you via a problem report, to change her profile to reflect what she really is now.

Businesses 22 Reviews 645 reads
posted
18 / 28

I could do another search, but this time only include "new" reviews, which will only include reviews since 5/3/2013.
But that would exclude a lot of providers who haven't had reviews in the last two weeks.

Providers will be off the top 100 list if they have not received a new review in 1 year.

I did mention that the accuracy of the data is important. And yes, the first reviewer determines the build.
Most of the providers with 1 review usually have low scores, so IMO the reviewer was somewhat accurate (no reason to lie if he had a bad time and gave her less than a 5 for performance)
Posted By: ChgoCPA
Assuming that active is a hooker that is still showing up on TER.  
   
 You can knock that in half as an estimate.  I could easily go through my local Top 100 alone and knock out close to 50 as they are no longer hooking.  
   
 And at least 35% of the hookers I saw over the past three or so years here are gone.  
   
 I will suggest that using the data base as it is to determine how fat the overall hookers are is not real here....as the 1st reviewer sets the mark.  And if a hooker has been around for a couple of years...she may now not just be "athletic"....she's just a fatty.  Good luck getting the fatty hooker to allow TER, or you via a problem report, to change her profile to reflect what she really is now.

Dr Who revived 625 reads
posted
19 / 28

As I stated there are many who are active (and presumably in your search string) that are out of here.  

But keep at it and eventually you may get this down to a realistic report.  :D

Wouldn't it be more fun to see the hookers and find out for yourself?  Well, not if some asshole lists her as athletic and she's a moose.
Posted By: Businesses
I could do another search, but this time only include "new" reviews, which will only include reviews since 5/3/2013.  
 But that would exclude a lot of providers who haven't had reviews in the last two weeks.  
   
 Providers will be off the top 100 list if they have not received a new review in 1 year.  
   
 I did mention that the accuracy of the data is important. And yes, the first reviewer determines the build.  
 Most of the providers with 1 review usually have low scores, so IMO the reviewer was somewhat accurate (no reason to lie if he had a bad time and gave her less than a 5 for performance)  
   
Posted By: ChgoCPA
Assuming that active is a hooker that is still showing up on TER.  
     
  You can knock that in half as an estimate.  I could easily go through my local Top 100 alone and knock out close to 50 as they are no longer hooking.  
     
  And at least 35% of the hookers I saw over the past three or so years here are gone.  
     
  I will suggest that using the data base as it is to determine how fat the overall hookers are is not real here....as the 1st reviewer sets the mark.  And if a hooker has been around for a couple of years...she may now not just be "athletic"....she's just a fatty.  Good luck getting the fatty hooker to allow TER, or you via a problem report, to change her profile to reflect what she really is now.

HangingwithBears 646 reads
posted
20 / 28

Had deep dish last week...

GaGambler 610 reads
posted
21 / 28

The problem is not your methodology, but the inaccuracies of the raw data itself. Not to mention the fact that we all have different opinions on what overweight really is. Some guys think a woman that is 5' 5" and 150 is just fine and others think a gal who's 5' 7" and 130 is a bit on the chunky side.

Businesses 22 Reviews 604 reads
posted
22 / 28

I'm in control of the providers I see, and I wouldn't consider any of them overweight.

And since I'm in control of who I'm seeing, it's not accurate to make any inferences on the population.  

If I choose to see ONLY "fit" girls, percentage of "overweight" would be 0%.
Posted By: ChgoCPA
As I stated there are many who are active (and presumably in your search string) that are out of here.  
   
 But keep at it and eventually you may get this down to a realistic report.  :D  
   
 Wouldn't it be more fun to see the hookers and find out for yourself?  Well, not if some asshole lists her as athletic and she's a moose.  
   
Posted By: Businesses
I could do another search, but this time only include "new" reviews, which will only include reviews since 5/3/2013.  
  But that would exclude a lot of providers who haven't had reviews in the last two weeks.  
     
  Providers will be off the top 100 list if they have not received a new review in 1 year.  
     
  I did mention that the accuracy of the data is important. And yes, the first reviewer determines the build.  
  Most of the providers with 1 review usually have low scores, so IMO the reviewer was somewhat accurate (no reason to lie if he had a bad time and gave her less than a 5 for performance)  
     
Posted By: ChgoCPA
Assuming that active is a hooker that is still showing up on TER.    
       
   You can knock that in half as an estimate.  I could easily go through my local Top 100 alone and knock out close to 50 as they are no longer hooking.    
       
   And at least 35% of the hookers I saw over the past three or so years here are gone.    
       
   I will suggest that using the data base as it is to determine how fat the overall hookers are is not real here....as the 1st reviewer sets the mark.  And if a hooker has been around for a couple of years...she may now not just be "athletic"....she's just a fatty.  Good luck getting the fatty hooker to allow TER, or you via a problem report, to change her profile to reflect what she really is now.

Dr Who revived 590 reads
posted
23 / 28

In addition the first guy may have seen the active hooker 5-10+ years ago when she was 5'5 110# and after living in Chicago and 1,875 deep dish pizza's and milk shakes she's now 5'5 175#....but still showing up on TER as 110#.

And if she's a 10/10 type hooker...God help the poor soul who exposes her  :D
Posted By: GaGambler
The problem is not your methodology, but the inaccuracies of the raw data itself. Not to mention the fact that we all have different opinions on what overweight really is. Some guys think a woman that is 5' 5" and 150 is just fine and others think a gal who's 5' 7" and 130 is a bit on the chunky side.

Businesses 22 Reviews 686 reads
posted
24 / 28

Yes, I already acknowledged the issues with the raw data and the reporting accuracies.
And the definition of overweight is also a problem.
Was just trying to put some numbers together.

Even with the inaccuracies of the raw data and reporting, the final number can't be THAT far off since there are thousands of matches, and I don't think every single one is that far off.

Guesstimating is only basing your number off of personal experiences and personal observations.
Not quite as accurate as using raw data (even if slightly inaccurate).
Posted By: GaGambler
The problem is not your methodology, but the inaccuracies of the raw data itself. Not to mention the fact that we all have different opinions on what overweight really is. Some guys think a woman that is 5' 5" and 150 is just fine and others think a gal who's 5' 7" and 130 is a bit on the chunky side.

Dr Who revived 569 reads
posted
25 / 28

If not...you should  :D

Posted By: Businesses
Yes, I already acknowledged the issues with the raw data and the reporting accuracies.  
 And the definition of overweight is also a problem.  
 Was just trying to put some numbers together.  
   
 Even with the inaccuracies of the raw data and reporting, the final number can't be THAT far off since there are thousands of matches, and I don't think every single one is that far off.  
   
 Guesstimating is only basing your number off of personal experiences and personal observations.  
 Not quite as accurate as using raw data (even if slightly inaccurate).  
   
Posted By: GaGambler
The problem is not your methodology, but the inaccuracies of the raw data itself. Not to mention the fact that we all have different opinions on what overweight really is. Some guys think a woman that is 5' 5" and 150 is just fine and others think a gal who's 5' 7" and 130 is a bit on the chunky side.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 606 reads
posted
26 / 28

...that could prove to be just as elusive.  I saw one provider's profile who has been on TER for over 10 years and her age was listed as 21-25.  If true, that means when she started she would have been...uh oh.

DT_lover 188 Reviews 640 reads
posted
28 / 28

The other two I saw because they had outstanding reputations for great blowjobs.

-- Modified on 5/18/2013 9:07:48 AM

Register Now!