TER General Board
One other problem with your data
GaGambler
posted
At least you kept that estimate on the low side 
you can tell the over weight providers if they have their hand/arm/pillow/sheets covering their mid-section and stomach in the portfolio of pic's. a quick gander at the last 3 pages of ad's in the Chi-town area and i'd guess that percentage is about 50%.
We have great food here and it's literally irresistible. If you're from Chicago, a good way to lose weight is move to LA. You won't find anything you like there and voila, off comes the weight 
Obviously we have an obesity problem in the U.S. . So providers. What percentage of your clients are over weight. My guess is 80% because a lot of us are old farts who haven't lowered their eating habits as they got older and less active.
For hobbyist, what percentage of providers are overweight. Both from who you have seen and what your guess is overall from pics and advertisements and reviews.
I'd guess for me it's under 20% for the ladies I've seen and 60% overall. Just a guess.
For hobbyist, what percentage of providers are overweight. Both from who you have seen and what your guess is overall from pics and advertisements and reviews.
I'd guess for me it's under 20% for the ladies I've seen and 60% overall. Just a guess.
But keep at it and eventually you may get this down to a realistic report.
I could do another search, but this time only include "new" reviews, which will only include reviews since 5/3/2013.
But that would exclude a lot of providers who haven't had reviews in the last two weeks.
Providers will be off the top 100 list if they have not received a new review in 1 year.
I did mention that the accuracy of the data is important. And yes, the first reviewer determines the build.
Most of the providers with 1 review usually have low scores, so IMO the reviewer was somewhat accurate (no reason to lie if he had a bad time and gave her less than a 5 for performance)
But that would exclude a lot of providers who haven't had reviews in the last two weeks.
Providers will be off the top 100 list if they have not received a new review in 1 year.
I did mention that the accuracy of the data is important. And yes, the first reviewer determines the build.
Most of the providers with 1 review usually have low scores, so IMO the reviewer was somewhat accurate (no reason to lie if he had a bad time and gave her less than a 5 for performance)
Assuming that active is a hooker that is still showing up on TER.
You can knock that in half as an estimate. I could easily go through my local Top 100 alone and knock out close to 50 as they are no longer hooking.
And at least 35% of the hookers I saw over the past three or so years here are gone.
I will suggest that using the data base as it is to determine how fat the overall hookers are is not real here....as the 1st reviewer sets the mark. And if a hooker has been around for a couple of years...she may now not just be "athletic"....she's just a fatty. Good luck getting the fatty hooker to allow TER, or you via a problem report, to change her profile to reflect what she really is now.
You can knock that in half as an estimate. I could easily go through my local Top 100 alone and knock out close to 50 as they are no longer hooking.
And at least 35% of the hookers I saw over the past three or so years here are gone.
I will suggest that using the data base as it is to determine how fat the overall hookers are is not real here....as the 1st reviewer sets the mark. And if a hooker has been around for a couple of years...she may now not just be "athletic"....she's just a fatty. Good luck getting the fatty hooker to allow TER, or you via a problem report, to change her profile to reflect what she really is now.
As I stated there are many who are active (and presumably in your search string) that are out of here.
But keep at it and eventually you may get this down to a realistic report.
Wouldn't it be more fun to see the hookers and find out for yourself? Well, not if some asshole lists her as athletic and she's a moose.
But keep at it and eventually you may get this down to a realistic report.
Wouldn't it be more fun to see the hookers and find out for yourself? Well, not if some asshole lists her as athletic and she's a moose.
I could do another search, but this time only include "new" reviews, which will only include reviews since 5/3/2013.
But that would exclude a lot of providers who haven't had reviews in the last two weeks.
Providers will be off the top 100 list if they have not received a new review in 1 year.
I did mention that the accuracy of the data is important. And yes, the first reviewer determines the build.
Most of the providers with 1 review usually have low scores, so IMO the reviewer was somewhat accurate (no reason to lie if he had a bad time and gave her less than a 5 for performance)
But that would exclude a lot of providers who haven't had reviews in the last two weeks.
Providers will be off the top 100 list if they have not received a new review in 1 year.
I did mention that the accuracy of the data is important. And yes, the first reviewer determines the build.
Most of the providers with 1 review usually have low scores, so IMO the reviewer was somewhat accurate (no reason to lie if he had a bad time and gave her less than a 5 for performance)
Assuming that active is a hooker that is still showing up on TER.
You can knock that in half as an estimate. I could easily go through my local Top 100 alone and knock out close to 50 as they are no longer hooking.
And at least 35% of the hookers I saw over the past three or so years here are gone.
I will suggest that using the data base as it is to determine how fat the overall hookers are is not real here....as the 1st reviewer sets the mark. And if a hooker has been around for a couple of years...she may now not just be "athletic"....she's just a fatty. Good luck getting the fatty hooker to allow TER, or you via a problem report, to change her profile to reflect what she really is now.
You can knock that in half as an estimate. I could easily go through my local Top 100 alone and knock out close to 50 as they are no longer hooking.
And at least 35% of the hookers I saw over the past three or so years here are gone.
I will suggest that using the data base as it is to determine how fat the overall hookers are is not real here....as the 1st reviewer sets the mark. And if a hooker has been around for a couple of years...she may now not just be "athletic"....she's just a fatty. Good luck getting the fatty hooker to allow TER, or you via a problem report, to change her profile to reflect what she really is now.
And if she's a 10/10 type hooker...God help the poor soul who exposes her
The problem is not your methodology, but the inaccuracies of the raw data itself. Not to mention the fact that we all have different opinions on what overweight really is. Some guys think a woman that is 5' 5" and 150 is just fine and others think a gal who's 5' 7" and 130 is a bit on the chunky side.
If not...you should
Yes, I already acknowledged the issues with the raw data and the reporting accuracies.
And the definition of overweight is also a problem.
Was just trying to put some numbers together.
Even with the inaccuracies of the raw data and reporting, the final number can't be THAT far off since there are thousands of matches, and I don't think every single one is that far off.
Guesstimating is only basing your number off of personal experiences and personal observations.
Not quite as accurate as using raw data (even if slightly inaccurate).
And the definition of overweight is also a problem.
Was just trying to put some numbers together.
Even with the inaccuracies of the raw data and reporting, the final number can't be THAT far off since there are thousands of matches, and I don't think every single one is that far off.
Guesstimating is only basing your number off of personal experiences and personal observations.
Not quite as accurate as using raw data (even if slightly inaccurate).
The problem is not your methodology, but the inaccuracies of the raw data itself. Not to mention the fact that we all have different opinions on what overweight really is. Some guys think a woman that is 5' 5" and 150 is just fine and others think a gal who's 5' 7" and 130 is a bit on the chunky side.