I wonder how long it will take for SW who left TER to come back, since twitter is beginning  to sensor their adds?

I think some of the other sites are gaining momentum as well.

Too many effective platforms out there to justify returning to one they didn’t prefer to use.

None of the smart providers I know are censored.
Social media is not hard. Post a few pics, ignore the trolls, link to your profile.
As a client, I can see what's new without registering.
It's not the end all - be all. Use the web like it is a web.

but from the other side of the equation I have to agree with you 100%

Whether you advertise on Twitter, Switter, Tryst, PD, etc. any client with experience or common sense is going to come back to whether or not you have reviews.  I look at Twitter for extra pics, that's about it, no matter how good you look or how much fun you're having in your pics, I still only care about the service and whether or not it's a rip off.  Anyone with common sense would be foolish to book with a provider simply by looking at their Twitter profile.  Of course there are some exceptions such as providers you've seen before, providers with a long history of reputable service, etc. but even that is dependent on if the client has been a TER member for enough time to know who said provider is.  To answer the question, it all depends on if said provider is raking in enough through return clients while sprinkling in some new guys who don't know or care about reviews.

I might follow a lady on Twitter, but would never use it to contact her about a meeting. In fact, my Twitter account uses a different email and handle than what I use for booking. Unless I tell her, she’s not like to know I’ve ever seen her Twitter.

I like seeing the stuff they post. Tells me if I want to spend time with them or not.  So hopefully Twitter backs off

I don't know how effective an ad platform it is for providers, but it certainly must vary by provider attitude. A lot of SW twitter is just virtue signaling among other SWers -- and that generally entails client bashing and man hating.  Doesn't really seem like a good marketing strategy.  
.
Even the slightest disagreement with some outrageous man hating statement will haven them pounce on you like a pack of rabid dogs.  

I follow several on Twitter to see the pictures and to read their comments as well.  A girl reveals a lot about her personality in her postings.  Does not take long to differetiate the nice ones from the man haters.  Lots of nice pics to look at too.  

enforcing their TOS, which they have done routinely since Day 1. I doubt there is some nefarious "provider purge" happening despite claims of such because of SISEA.

Outside of viewing some eye candy, and that is becoming rare, I have no use for it.  

there is censory overload?  Lol

based on their loud political views on Twitter
a version of cancel culture I suppose
a damn shame

to the old saying, "If you're got it, flaunt it."  Some things are better left un-flaunted.  LOL

even though you are probably too tightly wound to enjoy it.  

Some even have current reviews. Although they don't partake in the minutia of the boards be it here or the regional boards, they're here. And some, in a away still need a review from here as there isn't a more reputable site other then TER.
It's just a shame we couldn't be more inviting to the ladies to lure them back..oh well.

Three tech giants, who will remain nameless on this board, colluded to take a direct competitor of Twitter off the internet.  

I somewhat disagree about politics being bad for biz.  It can alienate 50%, but also stimulate 50%.  So it might be a wash.

Although men tend to be more conservative than liberal (cucks )

To the 40% or so Twatter crowd, I say good riddance. I find that the ladies who tweet the most and delisted are often the ones not worth meeting. For the life of me, I don’t know why these girls tweet the things that they do. I have become disgusted with so many ladies I formerly lusted after and planned to see. Twitter only took away the smoke and mirrors and showed me their materialism, egotism, mental disorder, and overall general hate for the male sex. I have also found that Twitter blurs the lines of discretion. On more than one occasion I have seen providers basically “out” their own clients by posting pictures of their homes and or Pictures of very identifiable features in the hopes of receiving praise from other providers. My ATF’s are well reviewed and do just fine without Twitter. They both prefer to meet with real clients instead of ranting like tortured buffoons of Twitter. They realize no one book them because they love to hear them  rant about their political views, hatred of men, or see pictures of their designer bags and shoes on Twitter. I could not agree more.

You really can get a sense of a lady's personality from her tweets. It has steered me clear of a few I was once interested in (including some with good reviews here), and it has also peaked my interest in some who I was once on the fence about, and turned out to be very good matches with me. The true colors of a provider really come out on that site!

When Twitter emerged, I thought it would be great for SW's .. they could give real-time updates on availability and location, announce specials, etc.  I posted this thought on Arby and was laughed out of the room.  

I have unfollowed several ladies over the years because of their constant trash talking/bashing of other providers. I view a provider's Twitter feed as part of her business marketing plan, and it baffles me how many treat their provider account as their personal, real-life one. Once unfollowed a lady because she posted pictures of her family's camping trip. Cute kids.

Some guys really do think "the nastier the better"but I agree with you, some things are better left to the imagination and sometimes "less is more" especially when it's done in a classy and tasteful way.

a list of  the stupid ladies who bad-mouthed Republicans would be useful
pretty easy to come up with
you certainly wouldn't want to go where you are not welcome
and perhaps a little cancel-culture payback to your enemies?
could be fun too!

as a SW I can tell you we always have issues with websites, always changing rules to delete our profiles or accounts. Nothing new and we can deal with this. If we survived to BP closure, we can find new sites.

If people are confused, your branding won't work no matter where you go. Consistency is key. And also following the rules of the platforms.

wink wink !

the SB their own following... I've notice this too! -

discussion about Twitter censoring or possibly shutting down providers/porn stars twitter accounts.
I use it to post my tour and local schedule,new selfies/videos and RT other providers/adult entertainers.
Who knows if some will come back or not.At the end of the day every lady does what works best for her.

Twitter isn’t a porn site where as this site is a review site.  

And part of this comes from my lack of social media platform expertise.  I'll look at a twitter or FB page of a provider or porn star but will never like, follow or engage in ANY communication.  This is only when following a link from a place like this.  I NEVER search a social media platform for this either from my social media.  I won't set up a second social media account for this either just because there's so much info that flows back and forth.  I can write an email about stuffed bunny toys and somewhere, an ad pops up on social media.  I really don't think there is a way anyone can start a twitter/fb/instg et al account and feel secure about remaining anonymous.

So a private owned company can’t take down a app on their server? Asking for a friend.

Amen!

Amen!  
.
Avoid social media like the plague that it is! Their goal is to connect everyone ... whether they want to be connected or not.

only "social media."  I have never joined any of the others.  One might argue that it makes me one-dimensional in that everything in my life is related to sex.  Maybe it is, but why would that be considered a BAD thing?  Lol

I'm getting an obscene amount of pleasure from blocking you, pal. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

hide from the truth cuck

"...conservative males are more than twice as turned on by hitting and choking their partner, while liberal males prefer to be on the receiving end of those aggressive behaviors."
.
The scientific evidence is overwhelming that liberal men are more feminine, and conservative men are more masculine.

be reported, not censored.  Its not a crime until they actually do it, but if the threat seems credible enough, the FBI can still charge them with conspiracy and catch them ahead of time.  By shutting them down, you just end up leaving law enforcement in the dark about what they planning, in which case someone is MORE likely to die.  Bad things happen when you don't let blabbermouths blab.  

-- Modified on 2/4/2021 8:39:52 AM

Because LE could monitor what they were saying on social media.  If you censor them, you lose the intel.  Another example of YOU being clueless.  

that the authorities KNEW, but did nothing.  That's a different issue.  The fact is, they found out from monitoring social media.  If you take that away, then LE doesn't get the opportunity to even consider doing something about it because they don't get the intel.  Without the intel, a lot more plots will be successful and even more people will die.  

You’ve taken a thread about provider marketing and branding and turned it into a debate about Parler???

help the police to derail their nefarious plans?  The bad actors will just communicate underground and make it more difficult for LE to catch them before they strike.  You keep talking around my question, which is "how does censoring them on social media help prevent bad acts?"  If you don't have an answer and are just anti-free speech, merely say so, and I won't ask again.