TER General Board
The policy was changed quietly or rules are excercized selectively 
[e]
[e]
tg_baby
posted
8 / 24
boominmyroom
posted
9 / 24
Dr Who revived
posted
12 / 24
The kind of ass that would bitch about his eggs being over easy, instead of over medium..
I say "Fuck you!" Wait a minute, and your stupid eggs will cook on the plate.
Then I'll shove the bacon up his ass! Sorry for the shitty metaphor.
It sucks that the provider has to change her name because of one asshole.
It can't help biz.
At the very least. You taught me something.
Thanks :
I say "Fuck you!" Wait a minute, and your stupid eggs will cook on the plate.
Then I'll shove the bacon up his ass! Sorry for the shitty metaphor.
It sucks that the provider has to change her name because of one asshole.
It can't help biz.
At the very least. You taught me something. Thanks :
Dr Who revived
posted
15 / 24
The reality is that in this gig transparency is important. As I posted, and many others have openly questioned, hookers with strings of 10/10's have raised many an eyebrow. Keep in mind that there are plenty of members here who discuss these matters beyond the boards...with sufficient information to form opinions on these matters. And you know it! Now get your head out of your ass
Proud of you Kate. Just because PS has his head up his ass and didn't know about it, doesn't mean that most of us didn't. People need to know the truth about such things, whether they think they do or not.
Dr Who revived
posted
16 / 24
EOM
Dr Who revived
posted
21 / 24
The "rip off" describing Kate is nothing more than what gets posted on other boards discussing the hookers who use various coercion methods to maintain "high TER ratings" which, from many hookers POV translate to "higher fees". There is nothing posted on that report that many guys haven't heard about in various back channel forms on so many of the 10/10 hookers. Perhaps even from you? Outing the STD issues on TE...maybe it is real...maybe not. The reality is it's just another reminder of the risks we all take in fucking strange. Now if you want to discuss some of the seriously BSC hookers who "out" guys for being smelly, we can have that conversation as well. But as many of us know and have discussed those types of hookers...they are insane. I'm not suggesting that the 10/10 (who are not the well known BSC) hookers will out a guy for that...but OTOH many have outed guys for not giving out a 10/10. And you know that as well
I probably should have said they can't delist themselves for bad reviews and then come back with no reviews under a new name. TER will link the two stage names, unless its a stalker or outing situation. In that case TER will respect the lady's privacy and allow a new name with no reviews.
As a last thought, too bad there are those among us who stupidly do not show that same respect for privacy. Those dudes need to go. I have no problem with a lady threatening to out some douche bag who stalks her, endangers her safety or invades her privacy as to family and co-workers. Same goes for the ladies - outing him for a bad review or a NCNS? She's got to go too. But actually carrying out the threat should really be done very cautiously and with much forethought and self honesty. Is it really necessary? In most cases, no not at all.
I disagree wholeheartedly about CCPA's comment that this gig requires transparency. I think he mis-spoke with that term and will agree with this: Honesty yes, but the veil of secrecy and privacy is of tantamount importance and is sacrosanct here. The whole point and purpose of TER is to promote honesty about services or common abuses (NCNS, misrepresented age, looks, etc.) without piercing that veil. If you choose to violate it by outing a lady (or a hobbyist) without really good cause, you must accept the consequences of your actions. People tend to react by slapping back when slapped.
We can bark, question the parentage, insult the intelligence and generally sling crap at each other all day long here. Lets just stay within the bounds and rules of the game and not blindly attempt to cause actual harm due to some slight or petty insult.
As a last thought, too bad there are those among us who stupidly do not show that same respect for privacy. Those dudes need to go. I have no problem with a lady threatening to out some douche bag who stalks her, endangers her safety or invades her privacy as to family and co-workers. Same goes for the ladies - outing him for a bad review or a NCNS? She's got to go too. But actually carrying out the threat should really be done very cautiously and with much forethought and self honesty. Is it really necessary? In most cases, no not at all.
I disagree wholeheartedly about CCPA's comment that this gig requires transparency. I think he mis-spoke with that term and will agree with this: Honesty yes, but the veil of secrecy and privacy is of tantamount importance and is sacrosanct here. The whole point and purpose of TER is to promote honesty about services or common abuses (NCNS, misrepresented age, looks, etc.) without piercing that veil. If you choose to violate it by outing a lady (or a hobbyist) without really good cause, you must accept the consequences of your actions. People tend to react by slapping back when slapped.
We can bark, question the parentage, insult the intelligence and generally sling crap at each other all day long here. Lets just stay within the bounds and rules of the game and not blindly attempt to cause actual harm due to some slight or petty insult.
Here on TER as a delisted person under providers with something to hide. I believe anyway 
good luck , Miss K
I had a bad experience with a provider. When I tried to post to warn other members my post was rejected, because she delisted. I didn't know post were being censor. why have a board if you cannot freely post?
I know this post was for Leonlp, but I wanted to chime in again and say that I don't necessarily disagree with you either. There are lots of women in this world who are BSC and who do stupid things things for high ratings. And yes, especially if they don't get that high rating. But that really isn't all of us. That's all. At the same time, I would also be cynical about the subject if I were in your shoes (by 'your' I mean the guys). In fact, there was a thread on the NY board where I stated how horrible it must be for you guys needed to weed through all that bullshit! You all definitely have the short end of the stick in how this has turned out with ratings and BSC women. At the same time, I do agree leonlp's response to this same comment of yours. It would be so wonderful to have TER, and indeed this whole world, without the bullshit. Not accepting it as a given in this world. And again, the whole point of me starting to respond to this thread in the first place was simply to ask you guys to think twice before writing a ror. If someone deserves it, it's one thing- and we don't know what the story was with the op. But if someone doesn't quite deserve it, it shouldn't go up. Kiss me, Kate PS is Kendall right? Is this a perfect example of what "providers with something to hide" should be used for?
If you did you wouldn't be using TER as a source of investigation...would you?
The "rip off" describing Kate is nothing more than what gets posted on other boards discussing the hookers who use various coercion methods to maintain "high TER ratings" which, from many hookers POV translate to "higher fees". There is nothing posted on that report that many guys haven't heard about in various back channel forms on so many of the 10/10 hookers. Perhaps even from you?
Outing the STD issues on TE...maybe it is real...maybe not. The reality is it's just another reminder of the risks we all take in fucking strange.
Now if you want to discuss some of the seriously BSC hookers who "out" guys for being smelly, we can have that conversation as well. But as many of us know and have discussed those types of hookers...they are insane. I'm not suggesting that the 10/10 (who are not the well known BSC) hookers will out a guy for that...but OTOH many have outed guys for not giving out a 10/10.
And you know that as well
The "rip off" describing Kate is nothing more than what gets posted on other boards discussing the hookers who use various coercion methods to maintain "high TER ratings" which, from many hookers POV translate to "higher fees". There is nothing posted on that report that many guys haven't heard about in various back channel forms on so many of the 10/10 hookers. Perhaps even from you?
Outing the STD issues on TE...maybe it is real...maybe not. The reality is it's just another reminder of the risks we all take in fucking strange.
Now if you want to discuss some of the seriously BSC hookers who "out" guys for being smelly, we can have that conversation as well. But as many of us know and have discussed those types of hookers...they are insane. I'm not suggesting that the 10/10 (who are not the well known BSC) hookers will out a guy for that...but OTOH many have outed guys for not giving out a 10/10.
And you know that as well
I probably should have said they can't delist themselves for bad reviews and then come back with no reviews under a new name. TER will link the two stage names, unless its a stalker or outing situation. In that case TER will respect the lady's privacy and allow a new name with no reviews.
As a last thought, too bad there are those among us who stupidly do not show that same respect for privacy. Those dudes need to go. I have no problem with a lady threatening to out some douche bag who stalks her, endangers her safety or invades her privacy as to family and co-workers. Same goes for the ladies - outing him for a bad review or a NCNS? She's got to go too. But actually carrying out the threat should really be done very cautiously and with much forethought and self honesty. Is it really necessary? In most cases, no not at all.
I disagree wholeheartedly about CCPA's comment that this gig requires transparency. I think he mis-spoke with that term and will agree with this: Honesty yes, but the veil of secrecy and privacy is of tantamount importance and is sacrosanct here. The whole point and purpose of TER is to promote honesty about services or common abuses (NCNS, misrepresented age, looks, etc.) without piercing that veil. If you choose to violate it by outing a lady (or a hobbyist) without really good cause, you must accept the consequences of your actions. People tend to react by slapping back when slapped.
We can bark, question the parentage, insult the intelligence and generally sling crap at each other all day long here. Lets just stay within the bounds and rules of the game and not blindly attempt to cause actual harm due to some slight or petty insult.
As a last thought, too bad there are those among us who stupidly do not show that same respect for privacy. Those dudes need to go. I have no problem with a lady threatening to out some douche bag who stalks her, endangers her safety or invades her privacy as to family and co-workers. Same goes for the ladies - outing him for a bad review or a NCNS? She's got to go too. But actually carrying out the threat should really be done very cautiously and with much forethought and self honesty. Is it really necessary? In most cases, no not at all.
I disagree wholeheartedly about CCPA's comment that this gig requires transparency. I think he mis-spoke with that term and will agree with this: Honesty yes, but the veil of secrecy and privacy is of tantamount importance and is sacrosanct here. The whole point and purpose of TER is to promote honesty about services or common abuses (NCNS, misrepresented age, looks, etc.) without piercing that veil. If you choose to violate it by outing a lady (or a hobbyist) without really good cause, you must accept the consequences of your actions. People tend to react by slapping back when slapped.
We can bark, question the parentage, insult the intelligence and generally sling crap at each other all day long here. Lets just stay within the bounds and rules of the game and not blindly attempt to cause actual harm due to some slight or petty insult.