A caveat first. Since I always use an alias on this board, you can't check my math or otherwise disseminate this info for anything other than what it is. A new topic.

More so with respect to appearance than performance. I know that a gals performance positively influences me to score her appearance higher than warranted at times. Most of my performance scores are in line with their average though.

Guilty as charged as well...

Why is it that mongers who score providers higher than average are "part of the problem", but those who score more harshly than most are not a problem?

You're making my brain hurt. Why not just get back to the beautiful and talented ladies that you donate so generously too

know my scoring system.  Its not complicated.  
 
Appearance:    10 = perfection
                            9 = above average
                            8 = average
                            7 = below average

Yu have time to ANALyze your ratings/numbers?  

All this talk of percentages makes it sound so... sterile.

I see where the OP is coming from, but its not a real problem IMHO. The two real problems are people who don't post reviews or those who post fake or prompted (prompted by the provider/agency to post a glowing review). For whatever social pressure reason, and its not a criticism but a social psychology observation, guys will post a higher rated review than they would have if asked by the provider to do so.

.... when I did I was a high scorer. Frequently very high.

I do need to get laid. No worries though. I'll be ridden hard later today. 😎

Interesting the first couple of replies were by aliases so impossible to even look at their scores. Maybe we need to change the name of this  board to the statistics board

but then I like statistics.  Only took me a few minutes to tabulate my data.  I looked at in aggregate:  A) The average of scores I gave on my published reviews.  B) The average TER scores of those same providers.  

I read the reviews. It is interesting to me how mongers and hookers can't wrap their mind around the  different way of scoring that was implemented. The high numbers are no longer about a perfect score but about a  definition of activities and their quality.
All this number talk is bullshit. An 8 is as good as a 9 or a 10 in quality. It just defines activities.

I may like stats, but guess my math skills suck.  So, correction:  Performance:  A) 7.68 which is 0.26% above B) their TER average of 7.66

A girls appearance positively influences her performance score from me. I'd rather a super hot girl lie there and let me fuck her rather than a less attractive girl do the same thing and let me fuck her. Performance is directly related to my satisfaction afterwards, right or wrong.

was more tongue-in-cheek than anything else. Just a mild poke at those who rant about overrate providers. If I really wanted to be part of the problem, I'd try to become a TER programmer and come up with more point-based categories. LOL Just kidding, Don't ban me!!!

Not complicated at all, and fair. Some guys definitely seem to try to rub it in. The few times I came across a provider actually deserving of  VERY below average, I've passed on the review opportunity to save myself the drama.

but in  this case, they really are BS. My data population is skewed because I don't review every provider I see. TER compounded this with the new system so providers with a history going back before the change may have a base of higher performance scores.