I am a photography lover! Since, I have always taken new photos on a regular basis because I think it’s fun. I am a huge fan of outdoor shoots. I noticed that the majority of erotic photographers who shoot providers are basic bedroom with lingerie. My ATF personally is in a bathing suit, or a sun dress because I’m from SoCAL it’s a lifestyle. Lol Smile for me!

A young lady I know ran some pictures by me to see what I like or what I thought might work. She took alot of beach photos, two piece thong type of suits, some with water splashing on her. I found I like beach shots, in the water on the sand, it doesn't matter, just be at the beach. She isn't the only one who has ran beach shot pictures by me. I find that I like the whole backdrop and scene. By that's me.
Oh I hate garter belts, pictures, in person...they're a hell no.

... closer to my area (Northern CA), I would've offered you a free photoshoot this past Summer since I was testing out a newer system I recently acquired - I'm still testing through Oct.  

A few months ago I had a photoshoot with an escort.  While I would have enjoyed location in the outdoors, logistics just did not work.

I took a provider to Hawaii a few years ago.   I took a lot of photos of her on the beach in various skimpy bikinis, and provided her with copies.  The last few years, she has always included two or three of these beach shots in her website photo gallery.  She agrees as well that they seem to be effective in pulling in customers that she might not otherwise get with strictly lingerie or nudity.  

Light on the suds, please.

She wanted me to take some pictures of her for use on her web site, which I did and they were pretty damn sexy. Then, just for fun, I took a picture of her with my cock in her mouth.
Lo and behold, a few days later it showed up on her web site. I got right in touch and told her any cop who wanted to bust her could use it as evidence. It quickly disappeared.

Believe it our not, those are hard to get given fogging, moisture on mirrors, enough bubbles to show what you want to be seen.

I think a mix of different types of shots is best.  I would not like to see all outdoor shots because I'm not a camper.  So some outdoors, some beach, some bedroom, some lingerie, some with lots of skin, etc.  You smile in your pics which is good... as someone mentioned.  That creates a friendly, welcoming vibe. So, keep doing that.

Most women know their best assets.  Personally, I like beautiful hands with long slender fingers.  Maybe I jerk off too much to cause my hand fetish.  But if hands are a good asset, show them.  Show legs, neck, face, chest, arched back or that flat stomach if any are your best asset.  I like a picture of a pretty face with a hand on cheek and neck well revealed.  The neck and hands can reveal a lot of how a person has lived and worked.  

Was this girl also a queefer like the one you recently told us about? You know, the one that dubbed you a "master cocksman" for having the rare talent of bringing out the queef in her?

anyone lived in a pretty how town
(with up so floating many bells down) -- e. e. cummings  
.
And cummings knew a thing or two about hobbying:  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._E._Cummings#Marriages
"In 1917, before his first marriage, Cummings had shared several passionate love letters with a Parisian prostitute, Marie Louise Lallemand. Despite Cummings's efforts, he was unable to find Lallemand upon his return to Paris after the front."
.
"Previous threads about what photos to use."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/previous-threads-about-what-photos-to-use-990095
.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/upside-down-downside-up-930183  (Wait a few seconds for the image to flip.)  
.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/no-upside-downs-934048
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/re-love-it-967503
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/not-aphasia-agnosia-868148
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/i-hate-the-upside-downs-922699
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/an-exception-verbeeks-upside-downs-693071
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/one-major-request-no-upside-downs-805738  
(And see "No fish faces" a few posts above. Also , "No Duck Faces!")
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/the-brain-and-image-processing-805952  
.
Image: Adele (the singer):

As long as the pictures are an accurate representation of what I will see when I open the door, I’m good. I tend to ignore ads with shadowy photos, photos that look like an attempt to disguise a woman’s real figure , and photos that don’t show skin.  
Bonus question: Do pictures in front of Ferraris, the Eiffel Tower or in a hotel suite that looks like it cost $5k a night impress me?  A resounding NO! Quite the opposite.

Do try to contain your fascination with me and attempt to be a bit less envious. Though I can't say I blame you.

I actually prefer those where a majority of them show the gal almost like you would see her in everyday life.  Obviously somewhat dolled up...  Maybe one of a "weekend look", then an "out with gal pals look", maybe a swimsuit one....  Basically, multiple looks...not all just in lingerie or bikinis