I'm sure this has already come up before, but this is the first time I've actually visited the link...

This is sad for so many reasons.  What kind of society publicly humiliates people?  Oh right... ours.

Not only that, but some of these guys look so pathetic, geeezz… talk about kicking someone when they're down.  These are the kind of images that give the hobby a bad name.

Incidentally, in spite of what they say in the news release:
http://www.denvergov.org/newsarticle.asp?id=4621

The women's photos can be found on the site as well...
http://www.denvergov.org/johnstv/MugShots/Tb000001.jpg  (…1-9.jpg)

No doubt these men and women are not among societies most fortunate participants, but this hardly seems to be the way to help them.

Reenver's

At least it confirms what the newbies info suggests that the provider your seeing has probably seen uglier guys step through the door.

My guess is that most of these are street girls.

-- Modified on 7/27/2002 4:52:40 PM

I'm looking for a nude sensual massage on Monday. tell me about the sessions & your rate. I do ask if during the session you would love for me to lick you.

Let me know because this is what i am looking for, Thank you talisa

I've seen worse, and I'm not a provider. Some guy posted a message in a public message board of a provider which was then e-mailed to everyone on the mailing list. It read something like,

"I'm just looking for a blowjob and maybe a finger in my ass, not necessarily fucking" ...

The provider deleted it quickly, but not before it had been copied to everyone on the forum list.

I think that guy is a John TV candidate.

I have to admit I kind of like the idea of humiliating people who are too self-centered to realize there is a way you just don't talk.  (and it is  caused by self-centeredness) And if you talk that way, you get to make a public appearance of TV so the whole community gets to find out how you to talk to others.


I mean anyone who blantantly solicits deserves it, IMO.  There is a difference between being suggestive and downright blatant about wanting to conspire to break the law.  These same fools would never be so blatant over the phone when talking to their drug-dealers!  


Talisa

-- Modified on 7/27/2002 5:12:56 PM

This person contacts me via email, wants an appointment at 2pm on Monday.  I explained that I don't book appointments via email and we need to speak on the phone first.  I also asked if he knew my prices (I think its strange to book an appt when you don't know the price).  Here is his reply...
_________________________________________________________________


No, I don't know your price

And this incremental approach to scheduling is akin to the death of a thousand cuts or the Chinese water torture.  Take your pick.

It appears that I will not experience the stress-relieving bliss and spiritual awakening of what you offer.

Bye

_________________________________________________________________

HUH????????

I think he is no stranger to stress relieving bliss, just that for him it normally comes out of a bottle of some sort.

I think you're giving him too much credit. The best explanation I can find I put in another recent post -- Men were given a brain and a penis, but only enough blood to operate one at a time.

I suspect you're not sorry you missed the opportunity to meet him?

Reenver's "JohnTV"... This is so pathetic...

The bum crapper of a line is "Prositution has a severe negative impact on our communities..."

Okay, maybeeee street walkers traipsing around near the school cross walks but come on - what concenting adult males and females do in the privacy of their "paid for establishment" be it a hotel room or their home should not be subject to witch hunt leper colony tactics.  Just another sexually frustrated policticans way of getting a few more right wing votes.  Pisses me offf...

I just think its odd how all the strange ones are coming out of the woodwork and emailing me today!  No, I won't miss him at all!

take your pick. I love you gals, respect what you do. But damn, there are some freaks out there. MfSD.

These hostile weirdos so make me appreciate you normal guys...kinks and all!

Melvinator, I give you credit for not going on a Rumsfeld or Ashcroft rant as others on this board are prone to do.

In which speech did Lord Clinton endorse streetwalking?

You'd have trouble getting sympathy for streetwalking in loony, liberal SF.

Left right, up down. The bottom line is, sex work could and should be legalized in this country, or at the very least, decriminalized.

Street walkers are a nuisance, can drive customers away from commercial areas, and turn residential neighborhoods (this very thing is happening in some SF neighborhoods) in to crime ridden havens. All the more reason to take a more pragmatic approach to the question.

Street soliciting can be regulated by ordinance, and I would submit that it would be a lot less prevelant and more easily controlled if the activities weren't on the vice squads list of things to do, and the ladies were given a geographic area to ply their trade. Mandatory health check ups would cost plenty of money, and smacks of socialist engineering, but the money that municipalities spend on prosecuting this work may be more than the costs that I have suggested. MfSD.

I am not endorsing street walking.  Just the opposite.  How can you regulate what consenting adults do in the privacy in their own homes?  I agree - legalize this hobby.

If its "decriminalized" (as opposed to legalized) then then the girls can work in their homes or outcall and have no excuse for being on the street.  I bed decriminalzing would automatically reduce the number of streetwalkers because the girls would prefer to be inside rather than walking.  I think England is a good system.  Streetwalking is illegal.  Organization (brothels) also illegal.  Working on your own...not illegal...not legalized either...meaning no licenses...very private.