Whether on blogs or here, I check to see if new reviewers concurred or dissented from my review of a girl, especially if I liked her. Usually it's neither at a detail level, but seeing mostly concurrence at the looks/performance level. But this kind of difference?? LMAO. I have to point it out because it's never been so extreme. This is not personal, so I left out her name.🤯 Different strokes for different folks. (He also goes on to criticize her A/CG skill, where when I'm with her she's doing ASG with her heels on in bed! So interesting.)

I like to see if others had similar experiences. It's also a bit of a turn on to read others accounts of girls I have been with. I guess it is the opposite of jealousy? lol. Not really sure but it's hot.

It helps me see what others have said good or bad.  And it helps me determine if they are getting possibly so busy that they might be otherwise booked when I want to see them.

at least three months since my own last experience with her and I'm considering seeing her again.  Otherwise, my own review is what tells me what kind of experience I am likely to get.  What others are doing or not doing, or what their perceptions are, are not relevant once I have seen her myself.

Is another man's treasure.  
Metering your tastes vs another mongers is really the only way to evaluate the precision of their reviews.  

Yes, while searching for other Ladies.  I usually have a Wonderful Time with my Dream Dates.  That is because of others Reviews & insights.

Damn, this is some weird clinical psych stuff, dude. Cheer up. Look at it from the human side. We're talking about curiosity, reliving the moment, being intrigued by how differently we mongers each perceive somebody we've recently experienced in a, shall we say, physically intimate way. And it's more than that...
 
To be honest, I root for the ones I like, so I like to see their profiles bumped with a good review.  
 
But just for the purposes of this thread, you don't think it's fascinating how we have a pair of breasts that are in my top 5 (and not #5) and
 
► he thinks they look *deformed.* LMAAOO.😂😂  
 
How do you not see that as interesting, if only for being very interesting.😭

I'm not sure what your middle sentence means, 'metering' and all that. However, I'm pretty much with you. There just is no accounting for taste. I like a girl in high heels, another guys gets turned on if she wears army boots. I think her breasts are spectacular for exactly the reasons he doesn't like them... that alone is pretty weird.

I do browse reviews of girls I have seen! If it is obvious the reviewer was shilling for the girl now I know not to trust his reviews going forward. If he reviews her like I did, I will trust his reviews going forward! If I have the girl 9/9, and he gave her 8/8, but I trust the content of his review, I may search his recent reviews to see who he liked better! Then I browse that girl’s reviews and decide if I should add her to the “to do” list! Finally, the “pervert” in me does like to see if other mongers enjoyed the “special sauce” of a provider I saw, or missed it! On the other hand, they may note a provider’s kink that I have to return and explore! Particularly on the cell phone, you can power through dozens of reviews in minutes, so why not?!

This is careless of you to say: "You used some interesting diction to make it appear like they were still e cups proportion-wise  (they weren't)..." I mean, WTF? The knowledge of breasts is weak with this one.
 
What I said is, "yep, they’re E’s," and I'm going to stay nice, by which I meant they most likely are what what the ad said. There's nothing equivocal about that. They may even be Fs or Gs depending on how small her miniature under boob really is. I'm guessing ~30, 31 inches. Somebody, if you go see her, take a peek at her bra size for us and report back, would you please!

There's a strange satisfaction in finding out whether other encounters were better or worse than mine.

Are these not your words? I just reacted to what you said.  

but here's someone that explains it all.

I did read reviews of girls I have already seen and reviewed, but it was not curiosity.  I was looking to compile a list of fellow hobbyists that had the same tastes that I did in providers and had a similar experience to mine.  This would allow me to improve my chances of seeing girls that were a match for my tastes and style.  It took a year and I read 100's of reviews to create my list, but now when I'm considering seeing a new girl, I can go to her profile page and look first for reviews from guys on my list.  If there are none, then I have to start reading other reviews to try to get a feel for whether she is a good pick for me to see.  

The best thing about this, in my experience, is that several times I have had out of this world GFE experiences with different providers, and was absolutely convinced she and I were a thing.  Then, I read the subsequent reviews and found out that the way she was with me, she was with everyone.  It is the equivalent of taking a cold shower, sobering up.  And therefore it is very helpful in reminding oneself that all a great GFE session means is that the provider is really good at her job.

😂😂 LMAO. So true. And the earlier this lesson is learned, the better.

Acknowledging that you're bad with guessing breast sizes applies to most of us. We think with a uniform "volume = size" mentality. The "average sized woman" that I had in mind is a size 36. If they would be 36C's as I posit, then Ruru is indeed a 32E or 30F. Her boobs grew out, not just full, hence my "missile tits" comment. And cup size is a measurement of the difference between the under- and over-bust and measurements. Two tits with the same volume, one a missile and the other a pancake, are going to have a few cups sizes between them.
 
He and I both ignored the underbust measurement in the ad. No way when he was saying "I would be shocked if she sports more than B cups" if he didn't have the "average woman" in mind. He had to, because he supposedly met her... and there's no confusing this little Japanese girl as having a 36 chest. And as I admitted in my review, obviously very truthfully, I homed in on the 'E' and didn't pay any attention to the rest.
 
As for the underbust measurement in the ad listed as 36, this agency fucks that type of stuff up constantly. They take the info from the girls and things clearly get lost in translation. They had a spectacularly shaped JAV actress whose height they listed as 5'6, IIRC. Then, when you look at the pictures they provided, there's one of a JAV box cover that includes her measurements: she was just shy of 5'2. Knowing that made me much more determined to book her (5'6 in 4" heels is borderline for me).
 
But, back to the reason for the thread, do you not find it odd that these breasts that I worship, and after reading quite a few of her other reviews find out I'm not the only one, are described by him as: "...her boobs have an odd shape and her nipples are not attractive." (Her nipples are easily 1.25" diameter, perfectly round, smooth, tan, and placed at the apex of each breast. There's even a tiny bit of 'puff' to them, think large Hershey's Kisses. A little more of that and I'd have paid to stay another hour to gawk. And if he meant the actual nipple, and not the whole areola shebang, then he's making shit up.)
 
I still contend that your approach, accusing me of using "interesting diction" to deceive, is way out of bounds and could just be projection. Anyway, happy mongering.

I meant to include this photo. These are 30E. I'm going with 32E for Ruru.

That show really does have so many "quotable" segments.

It's difficult for me to know what parts of what you write are fact.

I did not say you deceived anyone.

He called them deformed!! GTFO, man. This is useless. Out.

And not defend a monger who was disappointed?  

"Bottom line - do not book her if you are sold on the boobs you see in the photo's - they are not what you'll get."

I always look. Most of the women I've seen are on my favorites list on TER and I get notified when their profiles get updated with new reviews. I usually read them when they drop.

Hm. I'm going to have to look into why that's not the case for me.

In your account profile, be sure “Email Favorites Updates” is checked.

How do you know they write fake reviews ? If you have a way of knowing maybe the powers that be should institute it. 😜

gets a new review, she automatically gets moved to the top of your favorites list. That’s what he means by “notified.” (If you sort your favorites by “Last Updated”)

-- Modified on 6/18/2023 11:31:11 PM

Actually it's a notification that their profile changed. It's usually a new review but sometimes it's some other update to their profile.

Actually I get emailed when a favorite's profile gets updated. Yes, that profile gets pushed to the top of the list as well.

7 or 8 years ago, and have revisited it from time to time when the subject of disappointing sessions comes up.  Fellow hobbyists that I encouraged to make a list of their own have reported good success with it.  If you are not sure if you can accept my system as fact, why not try it first and see how it works for you?   Setting up your list is time consuming, but the reward is that you will save tens of thousands of dollars on sessions that could have been avoided by having a peer group that likes the same kinds of girls you like, just like I have done.  

but it's just common sense.  When a review or a profile goes up that has glaring mistakes, It tips me off to fakes.  For example, a first reviewer puts up a profile of a girl and says she has no tattoos.  Then I see her, and it turns out she has the NYC skyline tattooed across her back, or something similar that could NOT be missed if the reviewer had really seen her.  I can rightly assume that the reviewer never saw her in person.  Oftentimes fakes are in the details of the girl, or her static incall if she has one.  Fake reviews can't be determined unless I have seen the girl, too, and noted the discrepancies, which earns a review a place on my "fake reviewers" list.  

What the hell. I didn't say anything about your "method," which would have been accurately interpreted to mean I don't care about it one way or another.  
 
The rest of it? All I can say is, whatever.

you don't care one way or another, but since you are just starting out a few months ago, perhaps using my "method" will improve the quality of girls you choose to see?  But what do I know after 400 reviews on TER and 450 prior to that on another site?   You can lead a horse to water, but . . . . . .     Lol

Damn, one thing is for sure, you and the rocket guy make a lot, a WHOLE lot, of assumptions. And, as far as I know, your assumptions are always wrong and, worse, they frequently have the effect of throwing off the conversation.  
 
In this case: What, you think that guys who join TER do so as one of the first things they do when they start mongering? Does is also follow then that all hobbyists belong to TER? Your weird assumption sounds nuts to me, but that's because my experience makes me free of it... it never crossed my mind. I think the first time I met you, it was a reply to me with some dumbass assumption that I decided to just let go.
 
Also, if you needed a name and/or link to the girl in order to discuss the issues I raised, then don't discuss them. I have to admit that the other guy, the one who found the girl's name and her ad after I said I'd like to keep her out of it, was able to point out some interesting stuff. However, in the end, even though interesting, I could have lived without it. Since the other reviewer hasn't taken offense, in the end it turns out to be moot.

doesn't mean you can control the content of the responses.  If you check the TER rules, anyone can respond to any thread in any manner so long as they adhere to the TER posting guidelines. I have provided a link for your perusal.  The OP does not have an ownership interest in the thread.  It belongs to the community, and when you try to tell people what they can post, you are not doing yourself any favors.  

you will learn that looks are very subjective because we all have our own tastes of what we like visually.  I don't find it weird at all that you like her tits and another monger might not.  Many of my peers do not like girls to be as slender as I do, so I have to adjust for that in evaluating their reviews versus what I'm looking for.  However, most mongers that have seen more than a few girls know what constitutes good service and will usually agree on that aspect of the experience.

There aren't any assumptions that I made.

Sorry rocket but since you have not seen the girl yourself you have not basis for claiming anything here is "fact".

If the op himself said that it's roughly 30E, I think it's pretty silly to accuse me of trusting him and making an assumption that it was 30E and not 36E.

I just don't get it. What is it with you... I've seen hundreds of providers. This is just weird. Kinda like toilet paper stuck to my shoe. Wouldn't you rather stick to facts? Try it.

further up the thread?     "It's difficult for me to know what parts of what you write are fact."  Well, the same applies here.   You SAY you have seen hundreds of providers, but you have 9 reviews.  I have been a member here since 2008.  That's a fact (go to the top ten poster list for proof).   CDL was not my original username.  That's a fact.  I didn't start reviewing here until 2015 after the other site I was reviewing on closed down.  That's a fact.  You can go back on the boards here and see that when I started posting and reviewing here as CDL, several mongers from the other site vouched that I was one of the top reviewers with around 450 reviews.  That's a fact.  I have 400 here, so far, since 2015.  That's a fact. (click on my username).  

I have to agree with you on this one.  The whole purpose of the thread seems pedantic.  

Perhaps Conan is being pedantic himself to point this out but it doesn't seem to be the right word:
"Pedantic is an insulting word used to describe someone who annoys others by correcting small errors, caring too much about minor details, or emphasizing their own expertise especially in some narrow or boring subject matter."

I agree with Conan's definition, and that was why I used it.  He's pedantic about most subjects, goes into the weeds, passively-aggressively insults those that disagree with his own interpretation, and when he backs himself into a corner, he just says it all doesn't matter and he could care less.  If Conan can think of a better word to describe someone like this, I'm open minded to whatever he suggests.  

I have to agree with the other guy. Your reply is closer to projection (unconsciously taking unwanted emotions or traits you don't like about yourself and attributing them to someone else) than a characterization of my posts. It's actually pretty common. LMAO. And talk about wordy! You regularly has verbal diarrhea in these forms.  
 
It seems that if you stuck to addressing what was said, you'd have almost nothing to talk about. Instead, to read you, one needs to separate fact from fiction and fluff. So much fluff.
 
You can have the last word. I mean, have at it. This isn't a sign of being backed into a corner, it's a sign of exasperation that you can't address what's said, whether in a general post or a direct reply. That's why I back out. It becomes fruitless.

do you mean like claiming you have seen hundreds of providers and have reviewed only 9 of them.  With all due respect, you said we should talk facts when it comes to cred, so I did, but am still waiting for you to even establish any facts for yourself.  Your posts are mostly opinion and you put up very few posts with useful information about how to navigate this hobby.  Each time you try to salvage your prior failure, you just back yourself more into a corner.  You should quit while you're behind.  Lol

added some enjoyment to an otherwise boring argument in which one person presumably has first hand knowledge and the other has just been reading things other people say.

I shouldn't have done that.

You have a piss-poor record of attacking me and NOT having the post stay up for more than a day or too.  Before this one, you were batting zero for 2023 and lost every one.  Every prior post of yours for 2023 was an ad hominem attack on me, and they all disappeared.    Here's an idea. . . . . why not post about something besides me and your post might live on for posterity.  Lol

Too many replies to catch up on. I apologize for any redundancies here.
.
1. Sometimes, conflicting reviews are due to bait-and-switch or reviewing the wrong girl. E.g., there were a lot of Coco's in the NYC AMPs and it was not unusual to find a Coco Profile with conflicting reviews: "Coco, 32 yo, 5'6", big fake boobs, ..." and "Coco, 22 yo, 5'0", super-nice natural B-cups, ...". Sometimes, it's bait and switch or someone taking over a successful name and Profile with permission that creates a mix of reviews: "Matushka is a 5'10" Ukrainian ... rock hard Es" and "Matushka is a 5'6" Latvian ... nice Cs."  
.
2. Bra size discussions:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/re-bra-size-956055
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/re-slovenia-question-956052
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/wikipedia-on-bra-sizes-ter-martketing-opportunity-490253 (11 years ago, but still some pretty good marketing ideas!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra_size
.
And now back to your regularly scheduled arguments ...

Thanks. This emphasizes what I said earlier about how the difference between band and bust is what determines cup size. Curious how somebody with Ruru's type tits, that grew out while they grew bigger, compared to somebody with pancake boobs that have the same volume as Ruru's, are going to be a couple or more cup sizes smaller, BUT, again, they're the same volume. I don't get that. Who knew, before any of us looked into it, that there could be so many factors a woman has to consider when buying a bra! LMAO. 😖🤯🥰

Big or small, I love 'em all.