How do you know they write fake reviews ? If you have a way of knowing maybe the powers that be should institute it. 😜
Whether on blogs or here, I check to see if new reviewers concurred or dissented from my review of a girl, especially if I liked her. Usually it's neither at a detail level, but seeing mostly concurrence at the looks/performance level. But this kind of difference?? LMAO. I have to point it out because it's never been so extreme. This is not personal, so I left out her name.🤯 Different strokes for different folks. (He also goes on to criticize her A/CG skill, where when I'm with her she's doing ASG with her heels on in bed! So interesting.)
ME
There's something about the way she presents herself that is magnetic to my (rusty) hardened steel, not the least of which has to do with her breasts... their shape, with big areolas perfectly placed.
It was in the shower where I first homed in on her wonderful, almost missile tits. On an average sized woman, they're at best C’s, but on her little body... yep, they’re E’s. And the shape of them is a perfect fit with that compact frame (not to be mistaken for thin – she’s got an ass!).
Playing with her boobs that were hanging straight down and moving. I was absolutely gawking at them while her head was bobbing up and down.
HIM
But... her breasts are listed as E Cups. Wow! That is laughably off. when I returned to my place after the session, I reopened the website to look at the pictures again. Sure enough, while that is definitely her face, the boobs are not hers - completely photoshopped. And E cups? I would be shocked if she sports more than B cups. Finally, the shape of her boobs in the photos are big, round and full. Not reality. In fact, her boobs have an odd shape and her nipples are not attractive. Bottom line - do not book her if you are sold on the boobs you see in the photo's - they are not what you'll get.
After that it might seem odd that I rate the session good.
I like to see if others had similar experiences. It's also a bit of a turn on to read others accounts of girls I have been with. I guess it is the opposite of jealousy? lol. Not really sure but it's hot.
It helps me see what others have said good or bad. And it helps me determine if they are getting possibly so busy that they might be otherwise booked when I want to see them.
at least three months since my own last experience with her and I'm considering seeing her again. Otherwise, my own review is what tells me what kind of experience I am likely to get. What others are doing or not doing, or what their perceptions are, are not relevant once I have seen her myself.
Damn, this is some weird clinical psych stuff, dude. Cheer up. Look at it from the human side. We're talking about curiosity, reliving the moment, being intrigued by how differently we mongers each perceive somebody we've recently experienced in a, shall we say, physically intimate way. And it's more than that...
To be honest, I root for the ones I like, so I like to see their profiles bumped with a good review.
But just for the purposes of this thread, you don't think it's fascinating how we have a pair of breasts that are in my top 5 (and not #5) and
► he thinks they look *deformed.* LMAAOO.😂😂
How do you not see that as interesting, if only for being very interesting.😭
I did read reviews of girls I have already seen and reviewed, but it was not curiosity. I was looking to compile a list of fellow hobbyists that had the same tastes that I did in providers and had a similar experience to mine. This would allow me to improve my chances of seeing girls that were a match for my tastes and style. It took a year and I read 100's of reviews to create my list, but now when I'm considering seeing a new girl, I can go to her profile page and look first for reviews from guys on my list. If there are none, then I have to start reading other reviews to try to get a feel for whether she is a good pick for me to see.
Other than 3, guys on my list do not know they are on my list, nor do I socialize with them, other than the 3 I become good friends with. The list is strictly to guide me in selecting providers to see that are a good fit for me. Obviously, a guy who thinks a girl's breasts are deformed is of no value to me unless he is one of the guys on my list. Then I must pay attention to what he says in the review and look for corroboration in other reviews. My list has allowed me to keep disappointing sessions to less than 2% of the ladies I see. Others that approach this from a different perspective have admitted that they are disappointed as much as half the time with the providers they chose.
With that said, I still get a craving for the rush of TOFTT with a new girl just starting out, or FOTB, who have no reviews, so that is always a crapshoot. The last few years, I have slowed down on wading into the unknown in favor of repeats with girls I like and finding girls that have been reviewed by my peer group. I also have a list of guys in SoCal who write fake reviews, so that I know who NOT to believe under any circumstances.
There are many low-volume mongers who have weird perspectives on this biz, and with a lesser experience level than a lot of veterans here, will say dumb shit like implants look "deformed." Personally, if it's a girl I have already seen, I could care less what other guys think. I will always go to my own review first if I'm thinking about repeating after a period of time since I last saw her.
It's difficult for me to know what parts of what you write are fact.
My list has allowed me to keep disappointing sessions to less than 2% of the ladies I see. Others that approach this from a different perspective have admitted that they are disappointed as much as half the time with the providers they chose.
...
There are many low-volume mongers who have weird perspectives on this biz, and with a lesser experience level than a lot of veterans here, will say dumb shit like implants look "deformed."
Also, why did you throw in the part about implants? What's that got to do with the price of bananas? He called her natural, exquisitely formed breasts, deformed. And I call them obsession worthy. (By the way, in a recent review, a guy says he would pay for extra time just to stair at her for a while. LOL.)
7 or 8 years ago, and have revisited it from time to time when the subject of disappointing sessions comes up. Fellow hobbyists that I encouraged to make a list of their own have reported good success with it. If you are not sure if you can accept my system as fact, why not try it first and see how it works for you? Setting up your list is time consuming, but the reward is that you will save tens of thousands of dollars on sessions that could have been avoided by having a peer group that likes the same kinds of girls you like, just like I have done.
When you put up your OP, the word "deformed" was not attributed to the other reviewer, nor did YOU or he say they were naturals. You added that on a subsequent post, so based on what you originally said, it is reasonable to assume that, like MOST derogatory terms about breasts, he may have been talking about implants.
When you don't link the review you are talking about, nor the name of the girl being reviewed, this is just an exercise for the reader in guessing how much is fact about what YOU are saying as well. It discourages others form participating on your links when you leave them in the dark about who or what you are talking about and then argue about alleged "facts" that only YOU are privy to.
What the hell. I didn't say anything about your "method," which would have been accurately interpreted to mean I don't care about it one way or another.
The rest of it? All I can say is, whatever.
you don't care one way or another, but since you are just starting out a few months ago, perhaps using my "method" will improve the quality of girls you choose to see? But what do I know after 400 reviews on TER and 450 prior to that on another site? You can lead a horse to water, but . . . . . . Lol
Damn, one thing is for sure, you and the rocket guy make a lot, a WHOLE lot, of assumptions. And, as far as I know, your assumptions are always wrong and, worse, they frequently have the effect of throwing off the conversation.
In this case: What, you think that guys who join TER do so as one of the first things they do when they start mongering? Does is also follow then that all hobbyists belong to TER? Your weird assumption sounds nuts to me, but that's because my experience makes me free of it... it never crossed my mind. I think the first time I met you, it was a reply to me with some dumbass assumption that I decided to just let go.
Also, if you needed a name and/or link to the girl in order to discuss the issues I raised, then don't discuss them. I have to admit that the other guy, the one who found the girl's name and her ad after I said I'd like to keep her out of it, was able to point out some interesting stuff. However, in the end, even though interesting, I could have lived without it. Since the other reviewer hasn't taken offense, in the end it turns out to be moot.
doesn't mean you can control the content of the responses. If you check the TER rules, anyone can respond to any thread in any manner so long as they adhere to the TER posting guidelines. I have provided a link for your perusal. The OP does not have an ownership interest in the thread. It belongs to the community, and when you try to tell people what they can post, you are not doing yourself any favors.
You say we got off to a bad start, but I don't even remember it. However, I spend so much time seeing providers, I'm not at all invested in any of the drama of this biz like a lot of posters are. ("The other reviewer did not take offense," which means you were HOPING for some drama.) Nevertheless, you seem to have a chip on yoiur shoulder about me, so I will just let you go on with the drama and ignore what you say, because it never seems to be the whole story until you are challenged, after which you start adding details and getting huffy. You haven't been here long enough for me to know for sure (less than 3 months?), but this kind of behavior is usually one of the hallmarks of the bullshitters. Then at the end, just now, you even admit the whole exercise was moot. What a colossal waste of time, right? Go ahead and have the last word, it's what you live for. Lol
There aren't any assumptions that I made.
Only facts. Fact is ad says one thing, and reality is different. You said as much.
If you are referring to my diction comment, I didnt say you did it intentionally. I was just stating that your take made it sound like there was no lie and the guy was wrong. Where in fact, there was a lie about size and guy had all the rights to be disappointed
I think the argument of "if the guy didn't get his feeling hurt it's OK" , is pretty iffy unless he said directly as much. He might simply not read the forum, not read the topic or even unable to post.
Finally, I feel like if you wanted to keep the girl name out of this you wouldn't quote your and the other guys review verbatim. It's extremely easy to simply look for that quote in a review you posted
Cheers
R
Sorry rocket but since you have not seen the girl yourself you have not basis for claiming anything here is "fact".
You assume that, or at best have tried to infer that based on your take of what you can observe -- which then is colored by your unstated assumptions and biases towards certain mongers/views.
If the op himself said that it's roughly 30E, I think it's pretty silly to accuse me of trusting him and making an assumption that it was 30E and not 36E.
But yes, you're right here. The assumption I do make here is that op is telling the truth and can tell 30E from 36E.
I don't really make any other assumptions.
How do you know they write fake reviews ? If you have a way of knowing maybe the powers that be should institute it. 😜
but it's just common sense. When a review or a profile goes up that has glaring mistakes, It tips me off to fakes. For example, a first reviewer puts up a profile of a girl and says she has no tattoos. Then I see her, and it turns out she has the NYC skyline tattooed across her back, or something similar that could NOT be missed if the reviewer had really seen her. I can rightly assume that the reviewer never saw her in person. Oftentimes fakes are in the details of the girl, or her static incall if she has one. Fake reviews can't be determined unless I have seen the girl, too, and noted the discrepancies, which earns a review a place on my "fake reviewers" list.
Unless or until I have seen the girl, there is no way for me to definitively say that a review is fake, so I'm therefore limited in who makes my list. There are many more that I SUSPECT are fake, but I will not add them to my list unless there are enough discrepancies in the review for me to be sure, so obviously, this is not something that Admin can monitor across the board and take corrective action en masse.
Is another man's treasure.
Metering your tastes vs another mongers is really the only way to evaluate the precision of their reviews.
In your example, he may be equally dumbfounded.
I'm not sure what your middle sentence means, 'metering' and all that. However, I'm pretty much with you. There just is no accounting for taste. I like a girl in high heels, another guys gets turned on if she wears army boots. I think her breasts are spectacular for exactly the reasons he doesn't like them... that alone is pretty weird.
you will learn that looks are very subjective because we all have our own tastes of what we like visually. I don't find it weird at all that you like her tits and another monger might not. Many of my peers do not like girls to be as slender as I do, so I have to adjust for that in evaluating their reviews versus what I'm looking for. However, most mongers that have seen more than a few girls know what constitutes good service and will usually agree on that aspect of the experience.
I just don't get it. What is it with you... I've seen hundreds of providers. This is just weird. Kinda like toilet paper stuck to my shoe. Wouldn't you rather stick to facts? Try it.
further up the thread? "It's difficult for me to know what parts of what you write are fact." Well, the same applies here. You SAY you have seen hundreds of providers, but you have 9 reviews. I have been a member here since 2008. That's a fact (go to the top ten poster list for proof). CDL was not my original username. That's a fact. I didn't start reviewing here until 2015 after the other site I was reviewing on closed down. That's a fact. You can go back on the boards here and see that when I started posting and reviewing here as CDL, several mongers from the other site vouched that I was one of the top reviewers with around 450 reviews. That's a fact. I have 400 here, so far, since 2015. That's a fact. (click on my username).
How about YOU stick to the facts? You SAY you have seen hundreds of providers. It's not a "fact" unless you have corroboration. Did you review on another site? Which one? The only FACT we know about you is that you started posting here about April 1st, 2023. Since then you also have put up 9 reviews, and you like to tell other people what they should post and how they should think. These are the only facts we know about you. I am happy to stick to the facts when it comes to cred in P4P. How about you? You are like the guy who recently posted here that he has been a TER member for over 25 years. The problem is, TER didn't exist 25 years ago, but he posted it as a "fact." Things that ONLY you know can only be facts for you. If you want us to accept it as fact, too, how about some corroboration? Try it.
Yes, while searching for other Ladies. I usually have a Wonderful Time with my Dream Dates. That is because of others Reviews & insights.
However, I'm not turned off easily lol I like to have several dates with the same Lady. I had over 150 Dates with a Lady since 2016. Now she is no longer in the Hobby ...
Some Ladies have gone Greek on me & on other Dates have said, " Not Today." NP Or they Normally Render Tongue Sucking DFK and on one Date they say, "Not Today."
Often I read something my Dream Date likes on another Review & will explore with her if I can do the same ...
I do browse reviews of girls I have seen! If it is obvious the reviewer was shilling for the girl now I know not to trust his reviews going forward. If he reviews her like I did, I will trust his reviews going forward! If I have the girl 9/9, and he gave her 8/8, but I trust the content of his review, I may search his recent reviews to see who he liked better! Then I browse that girl’s reviews and decide if I should add her to the “to do” list! Finally, the “pervert” in me does like to see if other mongers enjoyed the “special sauce” of a provider I saw, or missed it! On the other hand, they may note a provider’s kink that I have to return and explore! Particularly on the cell phone, you can power through dozens of reviews in minutes, so why not?!
Whether on blogs or here, I check to see if new reviewers concurred or dissented from my review of a girl, especially if I liked her. Usually it's neither at a detail level, but seeing mostly concurrence at the looks/performance level. But this kind of difference?? LMAO. I have to point it out because it's never been so extreme. This is not personal, so I left out her name.🤯 Different strokes for different folks. (He also goes on to criticize her A/CG skill, where when I'm with her she's doing ASG with her heels on in bed! So interesting.)
ME
There's something about the way she presents herself that is magnetic to my (rusty) hardened steel, not the least of which has to do with her breasts... their shape, with big areolas perfectly placed.
It was in the shower where I first homed in on her wonderful, almost missile tits. On an average sized woman, they're at best C’s, but on her little body... yep, they’re E’s. And the shape of them is a perfect fit with that compact frame (not to be mistaken for thin – she’s got an ass!).
Playing with her boobs that were hanging straight down and moving. I was absolutely gawking at them while her head was bobbing up and down.
HIM
But... her breasts are listed as E Cups. Wow! That is laughably off. when I returned to my place after the session, I reopened the website to look at the pictures again. Sure enough, while that is definitely her face, the boobs are not hers - completely photoshopped. And E cups? I would be shocked if she sports more than B cups. Finally, the shape of her boobs in the photos are big, round and full. Not reality. In fact, her boobs have an odd shape and her nipples are not attractive. Bottom line - do not book her if you are sold on the boobs you see in the photo's - they are not what you'll get.
After that it might seem odd that I rate the session good.
On topic, I'd check out reviews if I felt something was off or I got something that might have been very ymmv and so forth. One girl I always warn others as she rebrands to yet another name, she was so off I was wondering if there is weird shit going on. I went to recognize search and check her last alias review in LA... and lo a behold her MO was the same.
This is careless of you to say: "You used some interesting diction to make it appear like they were still e cups proportion-wise (they weren't)..." I mean, WTF? The knowledge of breasts is weak with this one.
What I said is, "yep, they’re E’s," and I'm going to stay nice, by which I meant they most likely are what what the ad said. There's nothing equivocal about that. They may even be Fs or Gs depending on how small her miniature under boob really is. I'm guessing ~30, 31 inches. Somebody, if you go see her, take a peek at her bra size for us and report back, would you please!
Are these not your words? I just reacted to what you said.
"On an average sized woman, they're at best C’s, but on her little body... yep, they’re E’s."
I'm not claiming to be an expert on breast sizes at all, I'll admit I'm pretty bad... but I'm pretty sure the first number measures the bust-band size
The advertisement for "Ruru" says her size is not just E.
But, rather 36E.
Thirty-six E.
Can you please kindly explain how a 36E on a little body girl is equivalent to a C cup on an average body?
-- Modified on 6/16/2023 1:48:05 PM
but here's someone that explains it all.
That show really does have so many "quotable" segments.
And not defend a monger who was disappointed?
Wouldn't be the first time. Not even the hundredth time.
added some enjoyment to an otherwise boring argument in which one person presumably has first hand knowledge and the other has just been reading things other people say.
I shouldn't have done that.
As far as making it "firsthand" knowledge vs second hand knowledge is kinda irrelevant here, no?
Both the op and the guy he called out agree that the breasts aren't correctly depicted in the advertisement.
And the guy whom he called out - like most customers who pay for advertised X and expect to get X - did not seem to care as to WHY the size wasn't correct in the ad.
There's hardly any more clear-cut argument that exists which tell why the guy op quoted was disappointed and upset. But I'm sure people - the usual suspects - will come up with a reason he shouldn't be.
As usual....the more sellers minimize the lies in the ad, the less reasons buyers will have to be disappointed.
Asking why the guy got disappointed while stating that the girl didn't have the breasts in the ad, is literally answering his own question.
Acknowledging that you're bad with guessing breast sizes applies to most of us. We think with a uniform "volume = size" mentality. The "average sized woman" that I had in mind is a size 36. If they would be 36C's as I posit, then Ruru is indeed a 32E or 30F. Her boobs grew out, not just full, hence my "missile tits" comment. And cup size is a measurement of the difference between the under- and over-bust and measurements. Two tits with the same volume, one a missile and the other a pancake, are going to have a few cups sizes between them.
He and I both ignored the underbust measurement in the ad. No way when he was saying "I would be shocked if she sports more than B cups" if he didn't have the "average woman" in mind. He had to, because he supposedly met her... and there's no confusing this little Japanese girl as having a 36 chest. And as I admitted in my review, obviously very truthfully, I homed in on the 'E' and didn't pay any attention to the rest.
As for the underbust measurement in the ad listed as 36, this agency fucks that type of stuff up constantly. They take the info from the girls and things clearly get lost in translation. They had a spectacularly shaped JAV actress whose height they listed as 5'6, IIRC. Then, when you look at the pictures they provided, there's one of a JAV box cover that includes her measurements: she was just shy of 5'2. Knowing that made me much more determined to book her (5'6 in 4" heels is borderline for me).
But, back to the reason for the thread, do you not find it odd that these breasts that I worship, and after reading quite a few of her other reviews find out I'm not the only one, are described by him as: "...her boobs have an odd shape and her nipples are not attractive." (Her nipples are easily 1.25" diameter, perfectly round, smooth, tan, and placed at the apex of each breast. There's even a tiny bit of 'puff' to them, think large Hershey's Kisses. A little more of that and I'd have paid to stay another hour to gawk. And if he meant the actual nipple, and not the whole areola shebang, then he's making shit up.)
I still contend that your approach, accusing me of using "interesting diction" to deceive, is way out of bounds and could just be projection. Anyway, happy mongering.
I meant to include this photo. These are 30E. I'm going with 32E for Ruru.
I did not say you deceived anyone.
I said that you used particular diction to prop up what was a misleading advertisement. Now you do agree that she is not 36E. We don't have to bring in average woman and anything else into this.
He expected 36E and he didn't get it. He expected huge cups on the woman, according to the advertisement.
I don't give a shit about breast size that much. But I know people who are VERY particular about type (naturals vs fake) and size. To the point they'd walk from a session if the advertisement was incorrect.
You asked "But this kind of difference?? LMAO. I have to point it out because it's never been so extreme."
There was no extreme difference. The other monger was clearly disappointed that the advertisement of 36E was clearly false. And he had the FULL RIGHT to be disappointed. The ad said one thing and the reality was another.
He called them deformed!! GTFO, man. This is useless. Out.
"Bottom line - do not book her if you are sold on the boobs you see in the photo's - they are not what you'll get."
This was his bottom line. Neither 36E or the pics were reality. He was disappointed and he had full right to be disappointed.
The number in front of the cup was created specifically to remove ambiguity. The number in the front of the cup was a lie, you both agreed. You tried to downplay it. As you've said, different strokes for different folks. For some like myself its not even a small deal - I won't remember tit size too much. It ain't important. And for some folks I talk to is the most important thing.
The bottom line here is simple. The ad was lying. His disappointment is understandable. You calling him out makes little sense to me.
And the most recent review on Ruru ALSO calls out her cup size. So he's also not the only one.
I have to agree with you on this one. The whole purpose of the thread seems pedantic.
Perhaps Conan is being pedantic himself to point this out but it doesn't seem to be the right word:
"Pedantic is an insulting word used to describe someone who annoys others by correcting small errors, caring too much about minor details, or emphasizing their own expertise especially in some narrow or boring subject matter."
I agree with Conan's definition, and that was why I used it. He's pedantic about most subjects, goes into the weeds, passively-aggressively insults those that disagree with his own interpretation, and when he backs himself into a corner, he just says it all doesn't matter and he could care less. If Conan can think of a better word to describe someone like this, I'm open minded to whatever he suggests.
I have to agree with the other guy. Your reply is closer to projection (unconsciously taking unwanted emotions or traits you don't like about yourself and attributing them to someone else) than a characterization of my posts. It's actually pretty common. LMAO. And talk about wordy! You regularly has verbal diarrhea in these forms.
It seems that if you stuck to addressing what was said, you'd have almost nothing to talk about. Instead, to read you, one needs to separate fact from fiction and fluff. So much fluff.
You can have the last word. I mean, have at it. This isn't a sign of being backed into a corner, it's a sign of exasperation that you can't address what's said, whether in a general post or a direct reply. That's why I back out. It becomes fruitless.
do you mean like claiming you have seen hundreds of providers and have reviewed only 9 of them. With all due respect, you said we should talk facts when it comes to cred, so I did, but am still waiting for you to even establish any facts for yourself. Your posts are mostly opinion and you put up very few posts with useful information about how to navigate this hobby. Each time you try to salvage your prior failure, you just back yourself more into a corner. You should quit while you're behind. Lol
You'll have to be specific in showing me where I did NOT address exactly what you said on this thread. This is what I was talking about. You make a "declaration" that is not backed up by anything except your opinion. That does not make it a "fact" for anybody but you. Try this . . . . If you have trouble focusing on my often-deeper explanations, then maybe you should not read all of my post. Just read what you are able to absorb, and then ignore the rest. You will at least be PARTLY-informed. Just a suggestion. Lol
There's a strange satisfaction in finding out whether other encounters were better or worse than mine.
The best thing about this, in my experience, is that several times I have had out of this world GFE experiences with different providers, and was absolutely convinced she and I were a thing. Then, I read the subsequent reviews and found out that the way she was with me, she was with everyone. It is the equivalent of taking a cold shower, sobering up. And therefore it is very helpful in reminding oneself that all a great GFE session means is that the provider is really good at her job.
😂😂 LMAO. So true. And the earlier this lesson is learned, the better.
I always look. Most of the women I've seen are on my favorites list on TER and I get notified when their profiles get updated with new reviews. I usually read them when they drop.
Hm. I'm going to have to look into why that's not the case for me.
In your account profile, be sure “Email Favorites Updates” is checked.
gets a new review, she automatically gets moved to the top of your favorites list. That’s what he means by “notified.” (If you sort your favorites by “Last Updated”)
-- Modified on 6/18/2023 11:31:11 PM
Actually I get emailed when a favorite's profile gets updated. Yes, that profile gets pushed to the top of the list as well.
Actually it's a notification that their profile changed. It's usually a new review but sometimes it's some other update to their profile.
Too many replies to catch up on. I apologize for any redundancies here.
.
1. Sometimes, conflicting reviews are due to bait-and-switch or reviewing the wrong girl. E.g., there were a lot of Coco's in the NYC AMPs and it was not unusual to find a Coco Profile with conflicting reviews: "Coco, 32 yo, 5'6", big fake boobs, ..." and "Coco, 22 yo, 5'0", super-nice natural B-cups, ...". Sometimes, it's bait and switch or someone taking over a successful name and Profile with permission that creates a mix of reviews: "Matushka is a 5'10" Ukrainian ... rock hard Es" and "Matushka is a 5'6" Latvian ... nice Cs."
.
2. Bra size discussions:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/re-bra-size-956055
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/re-slovenia-question-956052
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/wikipedia-on-bra-sizes-ter-martketing-opportunity-490253 (11 years ago, but still some pretty good marketing ideas!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra_size
.
And now back to your regularly scheduled arguments ...
Whether on blogs or here, I check to see if new reviewers concurred or dissented from my review of a girl, especially if I liked her. Usually it's neither at a detail level, but seeing mostly concurrence at the looks/performance level. But this kind of difference?? LMAO. I have to point it out because it's never been so extreme. This is not personal, so I left out her name.🤯 Different strokes for different folks. (He also goes on to criticize her A/CG skill, where when I'm with her she's doing ASG with her heels on in bed! So interesting.)
ME
There's something about the way she presents herself that is magnetic to my (rusty) hardened steel, not the least of which has to do with her breasts... their shape, with big areolas perfectly placed.
It was in the shower where I first homed in on her wonderful, almost missile tits. On an average sized woman, they're at best C’s, but on her little body... yep, they’re E’s. And the shape of them is a perfect fit with that compact frame (not to be mistaken for thin – she’s got an ass!).
Playing with her boobs that were hanging straight down and moving. I was absolutely gawking at them while her head was bobbing up and down.
HIM
But... her breasts are listed as E Cups. Wow! That is laughably off. when I returned to my place after the session, I reopened the website to look at the pictures again. Sure enough, while that is definitely her face, the boobs are not hers - completely photoshopped. And E cups? I would be shocked if she sports more than B cups. Finally, the shape of her boobs in the photos are big, round and full. Not reality. In fact, her boobs have an odd shape and her nipples are not attractive. Bottom line - do not book her if you are sold on the boobs you see in the photo's - they are not what you'll get.
After that it might seem odd that I rate the session good.
Thanks. This emphasizes what I said earlier about how the difference between band and bust is what determines cup size. Curious how somebody with Ruru's type tits, that grew out while they grew bigger, compared to somebody with pancake boobs that have the same volume as Ruru's, are going to be a couple or more cup sizes smaller, BUT, again, they're the same volume. I don't get that. Who knew, before any of us looked into it, that there could be so many factors a woman has to consider when buying a bra! LMAO. 😖🤯🥰
Big or small, I love 'em all.