I have been around for awhile, and have always wanted to help providers. I am curious why we as providers have never had an option to verify our own reviews. After receiving many fake reviews in my career the lies can tarnish your reputation & hurt your business. It is very easy for a person to submit slanderous reviews for free membership. In my personal opinion: I believe providers should be notified by email when a new review is posted & have an option to verify.  

This has been discussed often and recently.
.
I think one main reason stated against it is that every negative review would be challenged.  
.
Instead clients are advised to take into account the general trend of reviews and throw out the high and low.

recently in a slightly different context where a provider went on a rant here about a review she got.  It turned out that she  was not being honest in her advertising.    

Not to discredit what you are saying but other's so far are right in my opinion. If a provider challenged every review there would only be 8's, 9's & 10's posted.  Just like it's a provider's responsibility to provide a good service as long as a client provides proper etiquette why on earth would ANYONE post a slanderous fake review just for free membership?  

Using the Yelp analogy, I suppose if a potential client could see both the negative review and the response, it might help.  I've rarely suffered from TOO MUCH information in this activity.  That is likely to put more stress on the system--what if the lady challenges 5 reviews within a couple of months, does the reviewer get to rebut the rebuttal, etc. I suppose all that can be worked out. And as a backup, as others have already pointed out, a lady can have a provably false review pulled, though it may take some doing. I agree it's a difficult situation and not one that's amenable to an ombudsman to resolve.

Based on other sites that allow review input by the provider, I think you would get less reviews and that the reviews would be either be raves or be terrible(generally about scamming).  I agree that provider needs to be judged on the body of her work. If a bad review is the outlier, I assume the problem is with the reviewer

Being in this business, however, has helped me skim over that one review from the bitter customer. (Or the fake review from the competitor.)

In this case scenario where fake reviews are being written when in fact the person never met the provider. I have had reviews wrote in the past that never occurred. I only cater to a few lucky individuals and always keep track of who I entertain. Since, I have required a deposit to book for 11 years now I can challenge fake reviews by asking to see the  proof. Now, for providers who do not have receipts proving the review is a lie maybe difficult.  

But I would think if a guy were going to post a fictional review for free days, that they would post positive reviews.
Simply because a provider is more likely to dispute a bad review than a positive... both real, or fake.

Depending on the vehemence and credibility of the rebuttal, it is still possible to call a review into question of the boards (local board or general). It's best to keep things simple and avoid anything that will trigger replies accusing you ("you" in general, not "you" = QB) of being BSC (as happened to someone recently).  Such a post would smooth over a bad or fake review in "real time" until more honest, good reviews bury the fake and restore order to things.  
.
I guess I could add that some Providers even call out fake reviews that are GOOD because they don't want to create a false impression (or create an unreal expectation) for others or alert TER to the fact that some reviewers are gaming the system for free VIP days. "Even tho' my recent 10/10 review by #$% is very flattering, it is not real. I canceled my tour to HisCity so he could not possibly have met there in July. I asked TER to remove that review but they have not done so yet."

I think SP should have an option to response to a review.  May be a couple of options like "yes review is accurate" or no or partially accurate.
Some reviews I see seem straight out of penthouse fantasy article.  But most seem accurate.

that was similar to that idea. Forget exactly when and am not finding it quickly so won't waist more time looking.

Most do -- or shoot for the average review target -- to keep both TER and the provider from calling BS on the review.

There is already a remedy on TER for providers that never saw the reviewer.  

humor was not wasted on me.  Never in the history of working women has a provider EVER complained about, or challenged a 10-10 review, even if its fake.  Good one.  I was reading along shaking my head in agreement until your example, where I said, "Wait a minute, . . . . .."   Lol

What could POSSIBLY go wrong with that plan??? lol

IMO why someone would right a fake negative review just to earn themselves free access? Honestly writing a negative review in itself already brings unnecessary drama that follows with it. Your reviews look great so just keep doing what your doing..

Do you see, QueenBia? Even I, one of the most upstanding and highly respected contributors to this forum, a fount of helpful information and valuable suggestions, is not above being dissed and attacked!  At least CDL didn't call me BSC ... yet!  
.
Bottom line: Providers can put on their fireproof lingerie and present their case or a warning about a review to the local board ... and be prepared for deluge!  

Are you happy now, or does it have to be CDL to call you BSC? lol

Question that I always wonder... Do reviewers generally get providers input and pre read their reviews b4 posting?  That way any discrepancies can be corrected.

I would imagine if they're bitching about fake 10's or 9's, its because of the rating system set in place on TER. Doesn't a 10 in service require a trip to Greece?
IOW...they would complain because those reviews may imply services not open to discussion.  
I couldn't see them having a reason to gripe about a high appearance score....regardless of validity.

-- Modified on 9/5/2020 9:37:22 PM

Yes the system is imperfect -- no such thing as perfection.

I certainly understand from a providers perspective but as others have already stated, that makes the reviews useless.  I have to deal with this at my company all the time and I don’t get the opportunity to just challenge and erase a negative review. In my business, I have even gotten proof that it was a competitor and the negative review was allowed to stand. Most guys will throw out the occasional negative review so for well established providers, it’s generally never a problem.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/exactly-830291?frmSearch=1#830291

about this.  He knows I was pulling his chain a little.  How often do I speak in absolutes?  You should have known by his response to Queen Bia that there was more to the story.   Why are YOU so fucking serious all the time.  Were you born without a sense of humor or did you have to work at?  Since you weren't privy to the PM, you come off looking like at idiot, at least to Imp and I.  You are the quintessential grumpy old man.  No wonder no provider will take your money.  

You're always claiming PM this and PM that as if it's proof of anything.  You know that PMs can't be quoted so you can lie your ass off about them.  No one hides behind PMs as much as you.

I personally would not have a problem with a provider making a short comment on her reviews.
Maybe something like; " We did have a lovely time but to clarify, I do NOT offer CIM" or " to clarify, I do not offer BBFS" or " "just for the record, this guy is a major ass hole".

As we all know, menu options are often YMMV, and I'm opposed to any policy that would allow providers automatic veto power in order to control the content of reviews.  I would just rather see TER reject any review that mentions BBFS if hobbyists are too stupid to know its probably YMMV and so they should not bring it up unless its stated in her advertising.  

...i do agree that providers should at least have a chance to comment/box to click or something to CONFIRM that the appointment was real..NOW...i do agree that you cant change a bad review,but often there are two sides to the story and more often then not the client is to blame...most women in this hobby,are amazing sensual people and they love being made love too...not all clients are that way....yes there should be a way for providers to"asterisk" a review for further comment..

That would at least walk the edge of the rules regarding review writing policies on TER. Best to simply recount the session as accurately as you can while being as neutral in both your emotions and prose as possible.

Is some.. key being SOME providers are wanting TER reviews to be done with the way the system is set up. Honestly this is the only fourm left from what I know where a client can be completely honest about their experiences with reviews. Yes to varying degree they all are your mileage may vary but ive noticed reading reviews on here who the quality providers are just by the clientele writing the reviews by large and if majority of the reviews left are good. For whatever reason every provider I've seen reviewed has a not so great review but by large it's easy to see as the one odd bad review sticks if the majority if them are the opposite! Common sense dicates to take that bad review with a grain of salt or as an isolated incident. But multiple bad reviews indicate a pattern...

That's not walking on the edge but totally against TER policies. Also doing what OP said does nobody any good and defeats the purpose in the 1st place!  

But can you really blame him for at least TRYING to forget the cowardly, weaselly, fat little cunts who break the confidence of a private conversation?

I agree with what you are saying in large part, so many honest wonderful sensual ladies.. but there are a few bad apples out there just like the same on the client side that they can con & easily lie just as much if not better than some of these clients!

Fake reviews, at least as reported by providers happen out of revenge for no response,  or they are unwilling to perform certain acts, or another provider  wants to damage her reputation.  

Well...i never said that none of the ladies had scruples.🤣

If you would stretch it out to a more realistic "one in a thousand" then you will have my almost complete agreement.

...confidential when someone posts the gist of a PM exchange but he LIES in his post in describing the PM exchange.  That's exactly what your butt buddy did - lied his ass off in his post about his PM exchange.

just born weasels.   In his case, you can't trust him as far as you can throw him.  All 350 pounds.  Bwahahahaha

As noted by others, disputing reviews can get complicated.