TER General Board
I was getting a blowjob and drinking a beer at the same time.
That's the only way I got the beer question right. 
I wish I had known this several years back.
HalfHour
but i am not stupidly vain about being bright. if i were stupidly vain i'd join MENSA or something.
and i qualify comfortably by 10+ points. it would for personal reasons be stupid for me to exercise my vanity that way: hence stupidly vain. it's a personal choice. the fact that it may be stupidly vain for one, does not make it stupidly vain for another.
an hypothesis more likely than not: that there are some members of MENSA who _are_ stupidly vain.
now to argue against that without examining the vanity of every member of MENSA one would have to take recourse to a flawed statistical argument: arguing to the individual from the mean of a group. it's an inferential fallacy i find particularly galling.
You are providing a powerful argument for such.
My reasons for not trying were two fold:
1) I am a bit of loner who rarely joins anything, but pussy is a powerful motivator and well... here I am.
2) I thought it wise to refrain as a counter to my intellectual arrogance. There are occasional social events I go to as a very bright lady's date. Only then, with several Nobelists in attendance do feel not the brightest lamp in the room.
But loose clever ladies? I say again ('a la mode de Gomer Pyle) Day-yum!
Since I am neither a rightist nor a leftist I can probably pass as "liberal enough". BUT I DRAW THE LINE AT CHOMSKY. He's a fuckin' cretin IMO.
& I will guarantee you that some who claim to be "MENSA eligible" will have to "google" mendacity---------LMAO !
Btw, Tex, if you did so well on the test, how come you didn't give out your score ?
I consider myself reasonably erudite, college degree, etc. But, am I MENSA eligible ? No. Neither do I suspect are posters whose mangled syntax & grammar ( among other factors ) would make them ineligible to join that organization, their protestations to the contrary. Imagine-----------lying on a discussion board-----LOL !
There are 2 or so posters who I feel WOULD be MENSA eligible------but, not playing favorites,
best to keep them unnamed------
too bad that you are not MENSA eligible. your carefully constructed post which comes out and says nothing while making plausibly deniable implications is interesting in one sense. it reveals more about your personal antipathies and so is interesting from that POV. if the plausibly deniable implications it contains are your actual view, then i think you need a course in remedial epistemology. see more on that below
to answer your cynical and silly question: i did not give out a test score because i took it carelessly, merely as a lark. my 1st try produced an invalid score that was still in the very high 20s. not valid = not reportable. not valid because i am keyboard and mouse careless when in recreation mode. i clicked on a wrong answer accidentally. it is just that simple. i was more curious how the software worked. so i did take it repeatedly to see whether the complimentary text message was hard coded to the score or whether it was quasi-randomly generated. you may wish to Google quasi-random
now as to your other possible insinuations, implications and so forth: i cheerfully mangle grammar syntax and even spelling here since it is only an internet message board. i don't take it seriously. i will occasionally go back and re-edit a post if it is TOO bad. but i type quickly, carelessly and as long as it is IMO decipherable that's fine. i discover that as i get older and suffer from certain infirmities i have less patience for proof reading.
focus on detail such as that is a personality trait, not an indicator of intelligence. if you've ever looked at facsimiles of the autograph scores of great composers you will see that there is considerable variation in clarity, legibility and afterthought corrections. some are very clear. some are messy. to make an inference from their musical calligraphy to their musical talent is erroneous. it is an understandable error in your thinking. as you say, you are not MENSA eligible.
now, if you are not MENSA eligible then you SHOULD logically and fairly disqualify or recuse yourself from having a valid opinion as to who might be. if your thinking fairly reflects this exchange, then it may show a certain rigidity and stereotyping that limit the validity of your inferences. it is not healthy to be dominated by crude overgeneralizations. let me suggest that you solicit some poster you respect for the course in remedial epistemology that you may so desperately need. you can overcome your handicap by care and training! good luck with that!