Well, I am cut like a good child from the 1970's America.

And it has been debated for years.  Can't you find anything newer or more interesting to troll with? If this is part of a final run for the SPOTY, it's a weak one.

I prefer cut. I've deal with uncut guys and there was always an issue with odor. One guy I stopped seeing because he was uncut and very smelly (huge turn off).

It is logically impossible. So you have no preference.  

First of all I got more.......Woo-Hoo....More power to me... *High Five*.....

I'm with inicky here. Guys a troll dumbass one. Better question would be which Rt prefers.  

Posted By: JuliasLilSecret

You know there has to be a weekly cock tread and it's Thursday already...he's just doing what he can to keep the status quo.    
 

hands down i prefer cut over uncut.  reasons:  if a man is uncut and does not stay on top of it there can be an odor and giving a good bj is a little more challenging with the extra skin.  finally, it just much nicer when cut.

I went out with a guy who had been circumcised as an adult, the pain with which he described the ordeal was cringe-inducing. If you have it as a baby there's no comparison but as an adult, I wonder if it's worth it?

if they are getting converted to religion that requires them to be circumcised, or if their Doctor advises them due to medical condition..

If you read some of my reviews, I elaborate in no uncertain terms how NOT to perform a BBBJ on me..You just cannot pull back the skin like you peel a banana. You have to be a little gentle with it.....

One girl analyzed my reviews and writing style for days..I ended up withdrawing my interest in her...

Who are you going to sue ? Your parents ,.know I'm rotfflmao ...look , your a middle class black kid who didn't get his timberlands for Christmas , move on and face the fact that many of us here are more gangsta than you ....! Happy Holidays ....

Posted By: Ridgetucky

Well, I am cut like a good child from the 1970's America.  
   
 But I never thought about it until I read an article in WaPost.  Fascinating readin'  
   
 I feel as I have been violated and I quote:  
   
 “there is evidence that unprofessional circumcisions may cause infections, organ curvatures, perforated urethra and, finally, additional operations, whilst even wrongly applied bandages can have severe consequences such as necrotic tissue and other irreversible damage. Some of the complications are regularly fatal.”  
   
 Maybe I would enjoy sex much more than I currently do.  Whilst I will never know.  
   
 Thinking about filing a class action lawsuit  
   
 So are you cut or uncut?  
   
 Do Providers prefer the head on or off?  
   
 RT  
 

We'll then excuse us. That's all that matters

Your friend is telling you that men die from infections due to being uncut ?
This is generally due to age . Generally due to not keeping themselves clean ?
Clean in what regard ? Not washing an uncircumcised dick ?
So after putting a man on the moon modern medicine has not discovered the correlation of old men not properly washing their uncut dicks and dying from it ? Oh geeeezzzz ......
Sweetie , I was in the military and homeless for months at a time without a shower - I stunck like hell but my health was not a issue ! Go and talk to homeless guys who are uncut - are they dying ?
An infection starts from an OPEN wound not being cleaned . Dying from being dirty and uncircumcised ?????????
Your an idiot for believing your idiot nursing friends. !!!!

Are you the 1 married guy here who got game with his SO .....oh you are a funny fellow ........

Posted By: Back_In_Black

Who are you going to sue ? Your parents ,.know I'm rotfflmao ...look , your a middle class black kid who didn't get his timberlands for Christmas , move on and face the fact that many of us here are more gangsta than you ....! Happy Holidays ....  
   

Posted By: Ridgetucky

Well, I am cut like a good child from the 1970's America.  
     
  But I never thought about it until I read an article in WaPost.  Fascinating readin'  
     
  I feel as I have been violated and I quote:  
     
  “there is evidence that unprofessional circumcisions may cause infections, organ curvatures, perforated urethra and, finally, additional operations, whilst even wrongly applied bandages can have severe consequences such as necrotic tissue and other irreversible damage. Some of the complications are regularly fatal.”  
     
  Maybe I would enjoy sex much more than I currently do.  Whilst I will never know.  
     
  Thinking about filing a class action lawsuit  
     
  So are you cut or uncut?  
     
  Do Providers prefer the head on or off?  
     
  RT  
 

-- Modified on 12/26/2013 12:04:16 PM

Prior to entering this biz, I had never seen an uncut dick in person. My count is now 2, but both of these guys were cleaner than a lot of the circ'ed guys out there, I'm sure.  

My guess is that Julia was referring to some extreme cases of urinary tract infections caused by poor hygiene. The elderly are at high risk for complications (for example: kidney infections) resulting from otherwise fairly benign medical issues. It's not super common for that particular sequence of events to occur (at least not before it's too late for it to be treatable), but it certainly does happen.  

You saw snip protestors ..? Seriously wtf ...some people ( not u ) have way 2 much time on their hands .. speaking of time any chance you have some ? I'd love 2 have you check mine .......and no cheese here lol....all USDA BEEF ! so if you were wondering "where's the beef" , its in my pants .........you do like prime choice ???? xoxoxo damn ur hottt !!!  

I'm pretty sure this is my first time addressing one of your posts directly. I hardly hate.  

p.s. >.......

Do you "cuddle". Ummmmmm, ohhhh Mr.fisher wants to know .........xoxo.....

Posted By: Back_In_Black

You saw snip protestors ..? Seriously wtf ...some people ( not u ) have way 2 much time on their hands .. speaking of time any chance you have some ? I'd love 2 have you check mine .......and no cheese here lol....all USDA BEEF ! so if you were wondering "where's the beef" , its in my pants .........you do like prime choice ???? xoxoxo damn ur hottt !!!  
   

Posted By: BadCollegeGirl

Prior to entering this biz, I had never seen an uncut dick in person. My count is now 2, but both of these guys were cleaner than a lot of the circ'ed guys out there, I'm sure.    
     
  That said, I have to say that I prefer cut schlongs simply for aesthetic reasons. However, if I had grown up in a country where circumcision was NOT the norm, would I feel this way? My guess is no. Just another example of cultural standards of attractiveness.    
     
  Despite my preference for cut dicks, I'm not sure that I support the procedure. I was actually driving past a local hospital the other day and saw some anti-circumcision protesters. Reading some of their picket signs, I have to say they made some very good points. There have been many cases of botched circumcisions, plus it just doesn't seem right to perform an unnecessary (from a medical standpoint) procedure on someone who is incapable of consenting to it (infants, in this case). That said, if you're going to opt out of having your child circ'ed, for fuck's sake teach him how to pull back the skin and clean in there. I've heard way too many horror stories of girls discovering fossilized dick cheese under guys' foreskin.

And you are un-cut!!!!!

of "timbalands" that my father gave me as a present back in 1995 and the fucking boots are still a good fit and not damaged in any way - really not even the color has faded that much.  

My eternal girl crush. That unruly curly hair. Those dance moves. Shiksa goddess. Slutty. What more could you want.

If you've never see this chick, Amy Schumer, her special "Mostly Sex Stuff" is worth a look.  Here's a couple clips related to this thread.  She's the funniest female comedienne I've seen...hands down.  

But I always laugh. Bonus points for not having any dick cheese!

Lol

They are worse than an uneducated moron. Grover Norquist Harvard Educated megalomaniac and Ted Cruz is another one.

You live and breath don’t you?

Some 100 year old bed ridden geezer not being able to clean himself.

Should all be clipped or trimmed and impeccably clean.

Preference: a greater liking for one alternative over another or others.
"a preference for long walks and tennis over jogging"
synonyms: liking, partiality, predilection, proclivity, fondness, taste, inclination, leaning, bias, bent, penchant, predisposition More
rather than, instead of, in place of, sooner tha

a 60% ? so youd like some "tutoring " xoxo......okay a few hours

A week through spring and I bet you'll get 100% in all my subjects xoxo......u r so cute .have a great new year , "T" .

Posted By: BadCollegeGirl

But I always laugh. Bonus points for being so sexy too bib ......and I'd love to snuggle with you ...

Robin said she likes both and you said it is not possible. You will never get the point at the level of thinking you are capable of. Once you overcome cliches, biases, right and wrong, black and white and I, your level of thinking becomes clearer and then you will get it.  

You are correct!  Besides, af can barely write a coherent sentence and is hardly an authority on such things.

Robbin did not say she likes both.  She said she "prefers both."  It's certainly possible to "like" more than one thing.  It is not possible to "prefer" two things.
Bottom line: af you are an idiot and, like most idiots, you are too stupid to know it.

You are struck on dictionary meaning of the word instead of thinking universally. There more things in this universe which you cannot have one without the other.  

How to clean themselves with soap and water instead seeing men who don't know how to wipe their ass clean.  

Oh, well, at least you are consistent.  Now listen very carefully: this has nothing to do with being stuck on "dictionary meanings" and "thinking universally."  Robbin's statement was very, very simple. And it's use of "prefer both" is simply wrong, not to mention impossible.
So, earth to af: language is intended for the accurate communication of ideas.  If language is used incorrectly, the idea is not communicated accurately.  Your pathetic written communications skills on this board are a shining example of this.  I actually agree with much of what you write.  But it is written so poorly as to make you a very poor advocate of your own ideas.
I do not expect you to remotely comprehend any of this.
PS: A final hint.  When you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging.

-- Modified on 12/27/2013 9:35:44 AM

Both parents have to request and sign papers. Otherwise, when the infant grows up, he can sue the hospital and even parents. Many educated parents are not circumcising infants any longer.  

The answer is "no."  But let me clarify.  Since you only recently returned to this board, perhaps you are unaware of RidgeSchmucky's history here.  He is a veteran troll who almost always posts annoying, misogynistic views which I enjoy taking a swat at.  He is totally unable to annoy me and is one of several idiots I like smacking like a whack-a-mole.  Or, in this case, a whack-a-troll. LOL!

what are your opinions on female circumcision?  Does it make you cringe and say "hell no !!!!" .  Do you like the little hood over your love button ?  Do you think that if the protective skin wasn't there, your clitoris might get de-sensitized?  Do any of you think it is a huge problem to keep your clitoris clean and smelling nice because it has a skin covering?  
Would you consider a country that routinely practices the ritual of female circumcision to be barbaric?  
yeah,  thought so.

It is mostly practiced in Africa in the form of a clitorectomy, which involves the actual removal of the clitoris.  It's purpose to to make it more difficult for a female to enjoy the sexual act and, therefore, make her more likely to be faithful.
In practice, the procedure is painful and often causes infection.  It is barbaric needs to be eradicated.
I have never heard of simply removing the hood and leaving the clitoris intact, but if such a thing exists, please enlighten me.  That said, I don't really see the point.  Having tongued a large number of clits, I find they are not hard to get at and, if properly stimulated, the results seem to be more than satisfactory.

AF: I hardly think Robbin's statement was a deep one except to say that she had no preference...I actually enjoy the topic, I started a thread on whether men should disclose what they are before a "date", P411 has that as an item. I personally prefer to know as uncut is still in the minority of the penises I've seen, not that I don't like them, but my exposure has been very limited

He wrote "that' sway."  What he meant to write was "that's why."  I think it helps to have a new baby around who speaks gibberish.

There are even more extreme cases of FGC (female genital cutting) such as sewing up the vaginal opening, leaving only enough (or sometimes not enough...which can lead to severe sepsis) for menstrual blood to pass through. Eventually, the stitches/fused skin/scar tissue will be broken through intercourse. I for one can't even fathom how excruciating that must be.  

And from my experience, a lot of them are uncircumcised. So I think I'll change my original stance to "no preference." Asian dudes = ladyboner.

I know exactly what I said.  Circumcision refers to the removal of the male foreskin.  It is an old and barbaric tradition.  
People in the media have used the term female circumcision to inaccurately describe the barbaric practice of what you accurately described as cliterectomy.  I suspect that, initially, it was determined that no one wished to print stories or broadcast the word clitoris so another inaccurate euphemism was adopted.  
I was trying to point out that many ladies that responded here as preferring circumcised cocks,  would not volunteer to have the skin over their clitoris removed any more than most men would volunteer to have their foreskin removed if given the choice.  
Also, that ladies don't seem to feel that keeping their clitoris clean is a problem, but think it is a problem for uncircumcised men.  

See, you do not get the point either.  You think it is an apples to oranges analogy.  Do you think the head of the male penis is less sensitive than your clitoris when it has a protective skin covering all of its life?  
Do you think your clitoris would be as sensitive if the skin hood had been removed when you were 5 days old and your clitoris was exposed to rubbing on clothing all your life?  
Why do we ,as a society, think it is OK to mutilate baby boys, but would be horrified if a doctor suggested mutilating a baby girl in this manner?  
How is this apples to oranges?

You are clue less too.  

I prefer both in this case means, I do not have a preference between the  

The real problem is people like you who are merely drones.

Am the president of the Jackie chan fan club.........anything ...?? You came didnt u..yeah I taught Jackie all his moves ..wanna see my noodle ????

So you're very opposed to circumcision for males?

But as small as it may be, his brain is still vastly larger that yours.  Please go look up "anencephalic."  You will find your condition described there.  Oh, and the word you tried to use is "clueless."
You're welcome.
anencephalic [ˌænɛnsəˈfælɪk]
adj
(Medicine / Pathology) born with no or only a partial brain

And your analogy about what Robbin wrote is totally wrong.  She did not say "I have no preference." She said she preferred both cut and uncut.  In other words, she clearly meant to say she has no preference, but that is not what she wrote.  You are simply too ignorant to understand.  Your "simple example" is also an incorrect analogy.
You are the only one who is clueless here,af, but you are too ignorant to realize it.  Not to mention stupid.  I'll be you don't even know that "ignorant" and "stupid" don't mean the same thing.
But keep on responding, so we can all see how ignorant, stupid and clueless you really are.
You are the poster-boy for the expression: It is far better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.

Thanks for clarifying what you meant and I'm glad you understand the difference between female circumcision and a clitorectomy.
There is a legitimate debate about male circumcision but what you fail to see is that there are legitimate reasons for male circumcision.  The fact that you may disagree with them notwithstanding.
Another big difference you fail to see is that, while there are legitimate sanitary reasons for male circumcision, there is no analogous reason for the kind of female circumcision to which you refer.  It is much easier for a female to clean that part of her anatomy than it is for a man to adequately clean his foreskin.

Dude, I literally JUST said that I don't necessarily support male circumcision. I have no goddamn idea what my clit would feel like if the hood were removed at birth, nor do I claim to know what it's like to have a dick, circ'ed or otherwise. Here's why I said that it's an apples to oranges analogy: you're equating foreskin with clitoral hoods and they're just not the same thing. It has nothing to do with the ethics of circumcision, it's just basic anatomy. Women and girls don't need to pull back their clitoral hood in order to clean their vulvas properly. Uncircumcised men do need to pull back their foreskin in order to clean their penises properly. Male genitalia is external, female genitalia isn't (at least not to the same extent). The bacterial composition and balance in female genitalia is much more complex than that of male genitalia. They're just not the same thing.  

A friend wasn't getting any at home...  apparently did not have a GF or provider...   So the foreskin refused to stretch after a while & got infected.  He had to have surgery...  I think he was about 60...  he was not a happy camper!!

it's a preference that is deeply ingrained with in a person's DNA...

Have you been ridden by one of them lately

I think giving him any benefit of the doubt by saying "can barely write" is giving him waaaaay too much credit.

Even people who don't speak English don't mangle the English language as badly as him. I am willing to wager I could pick any tica right here in the Del Rey, and they could write a more coherent sentence in English than him.

Case in point, you drones going to third and fourth rate universities never learn “critical thinking” or “contextual reasoning”.  

shit about context and next time you read, interpret everything to dictionary meaning and see what you get.Glad to see you are smart to interpret dictionary,  

Your verbal diarrhea is awesome to behold.  You are able to pack less intelligence and coherence into a single post than anyone, including angelexotic.  Is English your first language?  Seems like the answer must be "no."
Here's a video for you

Every toddler in our organization not only writes better than af but has much more game.  Withdraw your comment or we will sue for libel and triple damages!

-- Modified on 12/27/2013 9:43:58 PM

Robin’s shameless posting history may win her this argument. A preference is a discriminating choice among options. However, the OP did not phrase his question as a forced option – “Do you prefer a circumcised penis, yes or no?”  This opened the door to infer other choices beyond those expressly stated. For example, if you were going out to eat with friends and they asked, “Do you prefer Mexican or Chinese?” you could reasonably answer, “I prefer both over pizza.”

You have now created a version of Robbin's post that no longer resembles what she wrote.  Even worse, you seem to be agreeing with anonymousfun.  I think the earth just shifted on its axis.  What next?  Dogs and cats living together?  An alliance with the Taliban?  Marriage to Udo?  The possibilities are endlessly evil.
I am going back to bed.  With my blankie.

While it's true that I have nothing against cut cocks, persay, it's also true that I get extra excited when the pants come down and there is a juicy uncut cock waiting for me.  Maybe it's the variety factor, since most guys in the US have cut cocks.  Maybe there's just something a little extra raw and wild about an uncut cock that gets me hot.  I'm not unfamiliar with them because one of the first boys I ever slept with when I was 16 had an uncut cock and taught me what he liked, so I learned the slight variations in how to pleasure an uncut cock vs a cut cock at a young age.  They've never weirded me out, they're just a little different, and I DO love a little variety in my bed.

If you sift through AF’s tortured prose, he is basically arguing usage versus syntax. (or so I inferred.) If you were to ask a mother, “Who do you prefer more, your son or your daughter?” she should correctly answer, “I love both my children and don’t favor one more than the other.”
However, if she simply said, “I prefer them both,” most would understand her meaning and leave the Chicago Manual of Style on the shelf

But as to AF's "tortured prose" (which, if you read it, your description is actually a compliment), yes, we all understood Robbin's meaning.  But then Cosette and others criticized her use of "prefer" and AF jumped in with his ignorant babble.  Because he is such a complete dick, a bunch of us piled on him and he continued to spew his idiotic and incomprehensible blather.  So what happened was more about AF and his idiocy than a reasoned discussion about proper usage.
Still, given your careful and artful use of language, I am surprised you are so willing to cut AF any slack at all.  
But I did learn something new from you.  Prior to your post I thought the Chicago Manual of Style covered things like when it is proper form to wear one's white leatherette belt and loafers with one's burgundy blazer.  So thanks for that

... a couple days later...

but with this late run, he may just win it all.

I mean he was a shoo in for the P&R's SPOTY, but I never really thought he had what it takes to win the overall title, I make have underestimated him. After all he does post on three boards rather regularly, and every one of those boards is a bit dumber because of his participation, Yes folks, we may have ourselves a winner!!!