Has anyone ever met with Nicole Marlee from Canada and has a Only Fan Page?

The red flag 🚩 for me was the sex lessons. 🤦🏽‍♀️

Um. Kind of classless for a provider to insult another provider, AND spread misinformation  

Thank you babe 😘

I'm kidding, but couldn't resist the opportunity to stir the pot with QB involved. Being this is 4 months old and you're responding now, it's hard to see what QB was referencing with her comments. As much as I'm not a fan of everything QB has to say, she is usually not one to lie. Is it possible you didn't have a lot of content, or recent content, 4 months ago?

With that being said, I'm sure Ms. Nicole is a very fine young lady but I have to ask...I'm just curious that way.
With a number (like 70 plus reviews) on that other site I'm not suppose to mention here, why isn't there one review of her here??
I've never been a fan to submit a review on that site, and most reviews there are, let me say... "fluffy".
I'm just curious...that's all
Better...TER?....LOL

-- Modified on 5/13/2025 12:42:47 PM

... not to hijack this thread, but surprised it is allowed at all.  On the Atlanta Board I responded to a query about a post a gentleman placed asking about a Provider he saw advertising on EROS who had no reviews on TER.  I mentioned that she had a review "on another Board," and that was enough to not post my review according to the MODS:  "Reason: You posts contains a reference to and/or a link to a website that has been banned on TER or is a "review" site."

Another reason why X-out-of-Y scoring is a 10-out-of-10 suggestion!

.....Maybe the rules are different in canada than they are here in the USA but can you film sex with clients without your fans page having release forms (including ID) from others shown in the vids/pics?  

I have no idea about WHERE a US law can be enforced or WHICH countries have similar laws. Depending on the specific offense, international cooperation might vary. From news headlines, almost every country would probably cooperate with enforcement of child pornography offenses. As offensive to the eyes as it might be, Fat - Ugly - Old (gordas - feas - viejas) Porn might be offensive in one country but not in another.  
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Protection_and_Obscenity_Enforcement_Act#Allied_administrative_law_(2257_regulations)
Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act
.
Allied administrative law (2257 regulations)
.
The administrative law that has been created by virtue of the Act to guide and aid its enforcement, 28 C.F.R. 75 (also known as the 2257 regulations), specifies record-keeping requirements for those wishing to produce sexually explicit media, and imposes criminal penalties for failure to comply. This is intended to ensure that no person under the legal age is involved in such undertakings. (See Pornography in the United States § Legality and Child pornography laws in the United States for more information about the term "sexually explicit".)
.
The regulations define the terms "primary producer" and "secondary producer". The term "produces" means:  
[...]

I have to disagree with it being a measure in the scoring system. DFK and BBBJ fine. Since the vast majority want these, it's fair game. But butt sex isn't something everyone wants. Same with a threesome. If I see a lady and she does the standard DFK and BBBJ, and I don't want butt sex- even if it's on menu, and I think she earned a 9, not a 9 because I couldn't give her a 10, but a 9 because that's what I felt she actually deserved, that's great for her. But then the next lady I see I feel she was a 10. Same acts/offerrings, but I can't give her a 10. So, even though she was better, she gets a 9 too.

I forgot to add this to my post, above, about X-out-of-Y scoring. I have no interest in certain options that can increase the max score from 7 to 8, 9, or 10. Nevertheless, I have had many FANTASTIC 7-out-of-7s and SPECTACULAR 8-out-of-8s!  
.
With every option added, would you be happy with a 7-out-of-10? (Read juicy details for details: "toothy BBBJ ... tip only ... complained during this ... only 10 seconds of that ... will not repeat.")  Or maybe be happier with a 7-out-of-7?  
.
A 6-out-of-10 is 40% less than ideal. A 6-out-of-7 is only 14% off the max (and might even be less than that but there is no fractional scoring). Which would you prefer?

I had checked out some of the links you posted and saw the idea and tbh... I hate it lol. For all the flaws with TERs system it is very easy to understand. Everything is easily comparable across the board and the numbers do a great job of setting expectations and communicating exactly what is on the table. I know exactly what a 7/10, 8/10, 9/10 and 10/10 means. Comparison is easy. Meanwhile I have no idea what an 8/8 would mean vs an 8/10. I don't think we need a separate system to accommodate providers that offer lower levels of service. It is very unfair to accommodate them when the competition is offering more. It is also in the clients best interest to avoid review inflation.
.
Of course the flaw is that guys who don't like/want butt stuff, BBBJ or GFE. They may be more happy with a woman with lower average score because they don't care for the other stuff that tends to inflate scores. However, that is what the written sections are for.

where the reviewer will conclude that it was one of the best times he has had but then assign a score of 6 for performance.   Most of the providers here do not consider a score of 6 to be a positive, and here is where the disconnect is when it comes to uniformity and consistency, sometimes even within the review history of a single reviewer.  

Huge post so bit by bit  

Correct - if I film my clients sign release forms

There are no reviews here because ….like many providers, I delisted  

Gosh  

I said I delisted babe

WEF are you doing here?  
Do you enjoy abuse? LOL.

If you’re booming with business anyway, I get it. I don’t disagree. There is a LOT of negativity here. It can be tiring to anyone at times. I appreciate the response.

Just an observation but someone might ask you the same question........

-- Modified on 5/14/2025 9:12:56 PM

You’ve apparently ruffled some feathers here and they want you gone. This is their turf and they don’t want you on it. LOL

Tsk, tsk, tsk.
But riddle me this: if you think this board is my "turf" how come I almost never post here?
Obvious much?
Not to mention inept.

Who's "they"? Ter rules?

10 out of 10 means once in a lifetime. Two of the biggest fantasies men have are threesomes with bi women and anal sex. The odds of finding women who are either into anal, bisexual or both is extremely rare. Finding women who DFK of FIV is not. I don’t care if not every guy is into it, there is clearly enough demand for it and it does come with an obvious premium. Plus, there are too many providers that beat around the bush about what they do and don’t do or pretend that GFE and PSE don’t have clear meanings or expectations. The TER system does the best job of cutting through this BS and helps guys find exactly what they are looking for without hassle. Changing what does and doesn’t constitute a 10/10 won’t change any provider’s attitudes about reviews or checking any boxes. They don’t really like them but I don’t really care. This thing we do doesn’t really work without them. So I don’t care if providers want to be YMMV, I don’t want to book three sessions just to figure out someone’s yes and no list. I don’t care about jealous providers who are upset that other providers are willing, if not eager, to eat pussy or do greek.. I say tough cookies those providers have earned the perfect score and the extra $$$. They’re offering what is in demand.

for a score of ten other than anal (this is what grown-ups call it); Two providers with one customer (menage a trois/threesome), or two or more customers with one provider (a gang-bang).  Both of these will get you to a ten, but one of these activities has to actually occur during the session.  If a provider has it on her menu, but you didn't do it, just offering it will not suffice.  

I hear your argument. And we don’t have to agree. And sure, there’s an argument for butt sex and threesomes being more rare. BBFS is as well, but that may be something TER doesn’t want to promote.