Has anyone ever met with Nicole Marlee from Canada and has a Only Fan Page?

The red flag 🚩 for me was the sex lessons. 🤦🏽‍♀️

END OF MESSAGE

Um. Kind of classless for a provider to insult another provider, AND spread misinformation  

Just to clear a few things up

My onlyfans page is very active and in the top 1%.  
I would link it here, but I’m not sure if that’s allowed

Content is exclusively filmed with clients. It’s been so fun running that page, interacting with subs and filming xxx lately. Would love to see you there.  

Sex lessons are VERT popular and genuinely such a treat to provide. I don’t know why a fellow provider would say this is a red flag to offer sex lessons. Such a lowball insult to make.  

Aside for filming XXX with me, sex lessons are definitely the most popular session by far, with a lot of people benefiting from extra practice and learning how to last.  

I have been providing for several years and have 70+ reviews on another site.  

I won’t mention here because I think it’s against TOS

I chose to not be listed on the erotic review because of what I consider an unfair points system (clients give 10/10 reviews and TER takes points away unless certain acts are performed and detailed in the review. Maybe that system has changed in recent years)

 
Hope that clears things up!
I’m only rarely in toronto - mostly Mississauga area when I am.., And being that I am an American escort, my rates are quite high for the area.

Thank you babe 😘

I'm kidding, but couldn't resist the opportunity to stir the pot with QB involved. Being this is 4 months old and you're responding now, it's hard to see what QB was referencing with her comments. As much as I'm not a fan of everything QB has to say, she is usually not one to lie. Is it possible you didn't have a lot of content, or recent content, 4 months ago?

 
As for the sex lessons, I don't know why that's a red flag. If you feel you can offer that, and there is a client base for it, nothing wrong with it. If someone doesn't feel they need, they simply don't choose that option.

 
And while I get your gripe with the review process, I don't think it's that bad. And, clients who use TER understand how it works. In looks, there are no limiters. So, if you're smoking hot, and you are given a 10, it's not questioned. In performance, DFK and BBBJ get you up to the potential of 9. I would say these matter A LOT to most clients on here. And, even if TER didn't require them, it would be hard to get a 9 without them from most clients. The last point, the one that gets you to 10, is probably the more problematic one. We're talking greek or a threesome is needed. And, to be fair, most sessions the client isn't asking nor getting either of these. I too wish it was something else more reasonable that got it to a 10. It's kind of ironic that a TS provider almost by default can get that 10 when their ass is serving the pussy role. Regardless, getting a 10/9 isn't that hard if you are that good.

 
And that other site which shall not be named, well it's poop IMO. There is hardly any checks and balances. Getting top stars is too easy. Details are often lacking. I have little faith in anyone well reviewed their and not on TER. I don't buy that the only reason to delist from TER is over the point system. I call BS.

With that being said, I'm sure Ms. Nicole is a very fine young lady but I have to ask...I'm just curious that way.
With a number (like 70 plus reviews) on that other site I'm not suppose to mention here, why isn't there one review of her here??
I've never been a fan to submit a review on that site, and most reviews there are, let me say... "fluffy".
I'm just curious...that's all
Better...TER?....LOL

-- Modified on 5/13/2025 12:42:47 PM

... not to hijack this thread, but surprised it is allowed at all.  On the Atlanta Board I responded to a query about a post a gentleman placed asking about a Provider he saw advertising on EROS who had no reviews on TER.  I mentioned that she had a review "on another Board," and that was enough to not post my review according to the MODS:  "Reason: You posts contains a reference to and/or a link to a website that has been banned on TER or is a "review" site."

My post didn't name the site but just the mention of another site even existed was a big no no.  So here we have a Provider extolling her "70+ reviews" on another site and it is okay?  And several of the responses also mention "another site" so I don't understand the contradiction.

Another reason why X-out-of-Y scoring is a 10-out-of-10 suggestion!

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/x-out-of-y-scoring-is-a-10-out-of-10-idea-1009688
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/x-out-of-y-scoring-is-a-10-out-of-10-suggestion-1029929
and dozens more posts about scoring.

.....Maybe the rules are different in canada than they are here in the USA but can you film sex with clients without your fans page having release forms (including ID) from others shown in the vids/pics?  

I have a great fuckbuddy I found on a cuddle site that also does amateur porn and we have a ball.  I told her that I'd love to help her make content (or use our time to add to her content) and her answer was "even if it's just your dick in the video, they need verification of who the actor with the dick is".  Maybe her interpretation of the rules is different?

Her work is mainly on the tube sites, not the fans one...maybe that's the difference?

I have no idea about WHERE a US law can be enforced or WHICH countries have similar laws. Depending on the specific offense, international cooperation might vary. From news headlines, almost every country would probably cooperate with enforcement of child pornography offenses. As offensive to the eyes as it might be, Fat - Ugly - Old (gordas - feas - viejas) Porn might be offensive in one country but not in another.  
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Protection_and_Obscenity_Enforcement_Act#Allied_administrative_law_(2257_regulations)
Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act
.
Allied administrative law (2257 regulations)
.
The administrative law that has been created by virtue of the Act to guide and aid its enforcement, 28 C.F.R. 75 (also known as the 2257 regulations), specifies record-keeping requirements for those wishing to produce sexually explicit media, and imposes criminal penalties for failure to comply. This is intended to ensure that no person under the legal age is involved in such undertakings. (See Pornography in the United States § Legality and Child pornography laws in the United States for more information about the term "sexually explicit".)
.
The regulations define the terms "primary producer" and "secondary producer". The term "produces" means:  
[...]