combining escorts and massage reviews...
What I mean by this is if you do Massage and Escort you are listed that way in the profile.
Now when a review comes in your listed in both places.  Well are you being reviewed as a escort or massage? I know it's closely related but!
I've read a lot of the reviews and not to often is anything mentioned about the "massage" so whats your take on it.

I think the reviewer should specify which category he's review for.

2. Do you think that Indies and Agencies should be separated as the Massage Parlor Girls are separated.

Personally I think it's a great idea.

Thanks
Kisses and hugs

to have FBSM separate from the usual GFE and PSE experience.

I usually have a massage as a part of any GFE experience I enjoy, but that is different from FBSM only, and each should have their own venue.

Same with BDSM.

-- Modified on 4/8/2006 8:15:39 AM

I think massage should not be listed or have it forewarned to girls that have sites--it can cause them more trouble legally.

In SC, I found out that to give someone a massage, you have to have a liscense and malpractice insurance and if you don't, it can be an automatic arrest for prostitution.  I became a Liscensed Massage Therapist last night but due to the long list of requirements -- no lock on door, no working in hotels or at home -- I have removed that option off my menu due to fear of false arrest.

Also, how would an escort get a high score with a massage with the ranking score TER has. Some other review sites ask if you liked the girl and don't give criteria

The looks rating I sorta understand... but would probably breakdown the performance a little differently...  Services offered.....  and quality of the services provided would be a reasonable breakdown --- that way, if the provided had everything on the menu.. they would score points for that, but if everything was done poorly, the quality of services would suffer separately...  I have had it that a lady provides DFK, but does it in a way that was not to my liking... or poorly done... Do I give a lower score?  or keep the score high?  If the fact that it was provided was a separate item from the performance, then I may get a better picture of what I can expect....

just my thoughts.

I think it might be helpful to have some sort of clear difference between "she gave me a nice backrub to start things off" and "this is an FBSM (or FBSM-only) provider".  Then again, there are some providers that are FBSM-only with some clients and FS with others, or they start out as FBSM-only and later decide to switch to offering FS, or might even start out as FS providers that go to FBSM-only.

In short, I think it could be a useful option, but might not reflect the reality of what is available with different providers, especially given the way that the TER database is set up.