I think it might be helpful to have some sort of clear difference between "she gave me a nice backrub to start things off" and "this is an FBSM (or FBSM-only) provider". Then again, there are some providers that are FBSM-only with some clients and FS with others, or they start out as FBSM-only and later decide to switch to offering FS, or might even start out as FS providers that go to FBSM-only.
In short, I think it could be a useful option, but might not reflect the reality of what is available with different providers, especially given the way that the TER database is set up.
combining escorts and massage reviews... What I mean by this is if you do Massage and Escort you are listed that way in the profile. Now when a review comes in your listed in both places. Well are you being reviewed as a escort or massage? I know it's closely related but! I've read a lot of the reviews and not to often is anything mentioned about the "massage" so whats your take on it.
I think the reviewer should specify which category he's review for.
2. Do you think that Indies and Agencies should be separated as the Massage Parlor Girls are separated.
I think massage should not be listed or have it forewarned to girls that have sites--it can cause them more trouble legally.
In SC, I found out that to give someone a massage, you have to have a liscense and malpractice insurance and if you don't, it can be an automatic arrest for prostitution. I became a Liscensed Massage Therapist last night but due to the long list of requirements -- no lock on door, no working in hotels or at home -- I have removed that option off my menu due to fear of false arrest.
Also, how would an escort get a high score with a massage with the ranking score TER has. Some other review sites ask if you liked the girl and don't give criteria
The looks rating I sorta understand... but would probably breakdown the performance a little differently... Services offered..... and quality of the services provided would be a reasonable breakdown --- that way, if the provided had everything on the menu.. they would score points for that, but if everything was done poorly, the quality of services would suffer separately... I have had it that a lady provides DFK, but does it in a way that was not to my liking... or poorly done... Do I give a lower score? or keep the score high? If the fact that it was provided was a separate item from the performance, then I may get a better picture of what I can expect....
I think it might be helpful to have some sort of clear difference between "she gave me a nice backrub to start things off" and "this is an FBSM (or FBSM-only) provider". Then again, there are some providers that are FBSM-only with some clients and FS with others, or they start out as FBSM-only and later decide to switch to offering FS, or might even start out as FS providers that go to FBSM-only.
In short, I think it could be a useful option, but might not reflect the reality of what is available with different providers, especially given the way that the TER database is set up.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
