Weight gain, weight loss, long hair to short, and some might even suggest a change in hair color. Really anything that might make a guy raise his eyebrows in confusion where he lays eyes on her.  

High-quality professional images "work" in the hobby because men have a strong response to visual sexual stimulation.

Damn but that name brings back memories! Victoria's accent, among other attributes, is so very sexy!
            Regards.....RR

Her professional images were so good that she would receive messages from other providers complimenting her on their quality.

Hi There Guys

Because of the amount of planning put into it (location, wardrobe, props etc). You have to keep it fresh and exciting with new shoots in my opinion...

Guys don't want a surprise when the door is opened, at least not in who is opening it.  They want quick reassurance that it's the girl they were expecting, then they can relax a second and appreciate your greeting attire and efforts.
So the previous poster is right - if your look changes, update the pics, but they don't always have to be professional.  A quick selfie "Hey, look, I'm going redhead now!" or "Cut my hair so it doesn't get in my mouth any more!" or something similarly flirty is fine.  If you've lost or gained some weight, a selfie to update that you've got a six-pack now (or not) is fine.

Had one in October 2013 and end of Jan 2014. My problem - I keep changing shit up lol. I'm getting another one tomorrow. Wuuut!

The market I catered to was not the drooling and never booking type, so I did not see the need for constant photo updates, participating in photo threads, etc. Unless something changed like hair color, weight, boob job, etc. once a year was all that was needed. Then again, I did not see that many 'new' clients, so the cost would not have turned into shit for me. If you work all the time ( at least every week) then I guess I can see a need to attract new clients, and new photos 'might' do that, but usually all they do are attract guys who look, contact you, and never follow through.  

With High Quality digital widely available...  and inexpensive...   these days.  Take lots of photos, keep the good.  One might need new photos often if your look changes...  some gals change their looks often...   others seem to change very slowly.    
Good quality picts, good resolution, open large enough to see are a must.

Go for it. My take...if you are questioning it, then maybe you're ready for new shots or a new look. I don't do professional shots myself so I change mine quite often. But for the ladies who do, whenever your budget allows and you feel it's time to. I don't think there's a 'right' time to this process, only when you feel it necessary for that change. I think guys like new photos more often than not, to see just what it is they are shopping for. Of course with hopes that they are going to 'buy' and not just 'browse' after the time and money put into that process.

I get my photos done every 6 months.   I have new ones now.I'm trying to change all my pictures on all websites.Take work. Have a good day!

-- Modified on 3/23/2014 6:47:29 AM

My hair changes every couple months, as it has my entire life lol.  

Glad to see a businesswoman doing an (informal) ROI on an investment!

I still can't get the words "Nah, lingerie's not sexy" out of my head. At least you got yours... I spent $1,300 just to be told I couldn't have them cause I wasn't with the agency anymore!

You paid for them, and I highly doubt they made you sign a waiver of rights to the photos.. what are they going to do, sue? Send you a handful of threatening texts? 'Bout it. I say use the photos.  If you used a photographer, give him the courtesy of a link somewhrre on your site.

Some of the review ratings are inflated, that's not news.  I don't get the sense from your posts that you pressure your clients for 10/10.  

In my view, for maximum benefit at the $300-$600 range.

As a Hobbyist, I like to see fresh photos, I like to see the changes in the ladies.  They are fun to save and remember the good times with my favorites, and each time I see new professional photos I get excited to see them again!

Something to do with cash flow...or so I have heard  

Speaking of which, I'm about overdue. Time to track down Tim and Evita!

I'm about to book with a pretty much UTR provider who has fantastic reviews, and a great website with great photos. Aside from her face, legs and the rest of her body, one draw for me was her (obviously manufactured) EE breasts. I've never experienced really big ones.

I can't wait! I love your photos.  

I tend to shoot every few months.  The problem is I love something one day and then am tired of it the next.  The same goes for my website.  

He may have earned his reputation here for photoshopping, but he really has a good eye.  
I've shot with a lot of photographers these past few years and he no doubt shot some of my best images to date.  Also, he inspires a rapport between camara and subject that very few other photographers capture.
That said, perception is everything, and so photos with his logo will be more critically scrutinized.  
It's a shame though since the issue of photoshopping should fall on the provider and not the photographer ultimately.

A couple of other Aldo qualities: he's an absolute sweetheart and his prices are VERY reasonable.  

Just like any other small business owner, you own every mistake and every success. If she hires the wrong photographer and she ends up with grossly over photoshopped pics that don't accurately depict her, blaming it on the photographer just doesn't cut it.

As for Aldo, IMO women are doing themselves a disservice by using him. Too many of us mentally add ten years and twenty pounds to any woman who features "Pics by Aldo" Fair or unfair, that's how many of feel, and as consumers it's our right to do so. The best solution IMO is to find another photographer. At one time Aldo was "good for business" now the negatives outweigh the positives.

Doing this, especially in my prime. Our reasons for joining doesn't always determine our reasons for sticking with it.  

I will have all new pics by the end of the week, and it's a pretty long photo shoot... Excited, but I suck at posing lol

You get those friggin pictures if you paid for them. WTF?? !!

He may be an excellent photographer but he lacks in editing, which is why people focus so much on the photoshopping with him. Other photographers photoshop too, but they have the skills and experience doing so that it's not obvious like when he liquifies (edits) not only the lady's stomach, but the background as well. It's pretty obvious, it's sad.

but the men who contacted me w/ a locked site were a different type of clientele who were interested in an exclusive type that not everyone could view or see, but when I saw the masses (still not that many man), new photos always kept their interest.

although we don't want to admit it, providers request editing whether skin smoothing, photoshop, tattoo removal, and when you invest money into a photographer who promises he can offer results, but doesn't after you've paid him….well, the photographer should take ownership or make it clear on their website or during email correspondence that they don't offer these services, which I know of at least one photographer is kind enough to do so before taking your money.  

the gal(s) have a responsibility (as GaG points out) to the reader on the ads they post these pics on.  The gals have the final determination as to what goes up...and what never sees the light of day.  That's the difference as I see it.

for some ladies for the same session length…when he's touring and offering the rest of the ladies cheaper prices. I know for a fact, so junking more than $$.5 but $$$$$ + tip (for the generous ladies who tip all service industry people) if you didn't get the results wanted, it's wrong. But I agree, there are way too many artists who not only know how to take a photo, but know how to edit one or refer the lady to a better editor or decline taking their photo, if the customer requires editing.

WTF are you talking about? There is nowhere in her post that indicates she is somehow upset with her scores, nor has anyone ever said shit about her pressuring them into giving her any higher. She has said on more than one occasion that she knows she is no 10. Don't you have some other hooker to white knight for? Heh. Sorry, but Courtney looks a hell of a lot better and I HAVE seen all of her in person. She also does not lie about her fake careers, her so called cultural upbringing (LOL) and her age like someone else we know.

Then, maybe you should pay for those frequent shoots that supply your jack off material. Get real. If providers were spending 1500 every 3 months on photos, you could not afford the hike in rates that would have to be added to account for such an expense. If you want new material, try a web cam girl who offers that.

No, I mean that he literally will not send them to me, even though I worked with them and asked for them for a year before I left.

I would much rather work with him (a great character of a person) than work with others who have more skills and are assholes. In the end, it's the provider who can control what she wants edited. I do not buy that "The photos came this way" bs. If they did, all she had to say was I do not want that much photoshop. End of story.

Even though you're bold and speak up, some ladies might not be as good at saying, "Sorry, I paid $$$$ and the edited photos look horrible, can you edit them again?" First, they may not want to hurt his feelings; second, they may be oblivious to the poor editing - after all they're novices and a professional sent them as final products so they must look good; third, if the photographer is willing to send poorly edited images out as quality work the first time around, then there's no point in requesting a redo. It's pointless, b/c he thinks the editing from the beginning was acceptable. In the end, if the lady wasn't looking for edited photos, then it's not a big deal, she'll just stick w/ the raw images, but obviously if she contracted a photographer thinking he can produce precisely edited images and he can't, well that's not cool and the photographer needs to take some responsibility for what they state they can and cannot offer upfront, and not attempt editing if they aren't skilled in that area.

His editing skills were not the point of my post.  
His ability to capture a good picture, before editing, is why I was defending him.
AND, I do believe we each are responsible for the consequences of our own actions.  

"He may have earned his reputation here for photoshopping, but he really has a good eye."