TER General Board

Her posts are being criticized. She is not being attacked. -e-
Cannonhome1 1282 reads
posted
1 / 76

Posting a review is to give back to the community that has helped a newbie. The provider in mind only has a handful of good reviews. She has a smoking hot body and a great pleasing attitude. I want to post a review to help the community find her. But she doesn't want reviews and hubby insists on respecting her wishes. I owe you guys. I'm frustrated. Guess I just need to get laid.

macdaddy1944 51 Reviews 1029 reads
posted
2 / 76

sometimes it is much better to leave well enough alone..

Posted By: Cannonhome1
Posting a review is to give back to the community that has helped a newbie. The provider in mind only has a handful of good reviews. She has a smoking hot body and a great pleasing attitude. I want to post a review to help the community find her. But she doesn't want reviews and hubby insists on respecting her wishes. I owe you guys. I'm frustrated. Guess I just need to get laid.

perfectstorm 19 Reviews 882 reads
posted
3 / 76

If I had a good time with a provider and she didn't want reviews, I would not submit one.

joecarter 916 reads
posted
4 / 76

what if you had only a mediocre or fair time with a pretty highly rated provider?

perfectstorm 19 Reviews 858 reads
posted
5 / 76

Earlier I said that if I had a good time and the provider wished no reviews I would respect her wishes, but under other scenarios, I might not respect them. If I had a terrible time, or she was a ripoff or b&S etc, then I would definitely write the review. Since you asked about a mediocre or fair time, my answer would be that if I felt the mediocre or fair time was my own fault, then I would still not write the review. If I felt it was on her, and that her previous reviews were not accurate, then I would probably write the review.

escalade1964 65 Reviews 760 reads
posted
6 / 76

you should still respect her wishes.  

Unless she is unsafe. IM

bludive_1 822 reads
posted
7 / 76

If she asks for no reviews you should be a decent, trustworthy person and respect her wishes.  These boards are INTENDED to protect guys from rip-offs, bad experiences, fakes etc so unless someone should be avoided keep it to yourself otherwise these boards are just a bunch of raunchy details and numbers!! The intended purpose has already gotten way off track!

Posted By: Cannonhome1
Posting a review is to give back to the community that has helped a newbie. The provider in mind only has a handful of good reviews. She has a smoking hot body and a great pleasing attitude. I want to post a review to help the community find her. But she doesn't want reviews and hubby insists on respecting her wishes. I owe you guys. I'm frustrated. Guess I just need to get laid.

Cannonhome1 774 reads
posted
8 / 76

A review will not be written. I was just venting my aforementioned frustration.  

Helping the hobbiest avoid the negatives is invaluable. But I like TER because it also helped me find a provider that has all the qualities that I was looking for. It's not just raunchy details. Those details tell me if the provider has the personality, attitude, appearance and skills that I was seeking. If you're putting out almost two grand for a special night, you want to be as sure as possible that the two people are compatible. I don't know what TER's intended purpose was but I, for one, am grateful it's here the way it is.

-- Modified on 11/11/2013 7:24:20 AM

Panthera12 706 reads
posted
9 / 76

her convictions must not be that strong otherwise she would have delisted herself. While I would normally respect a provider's wishes in this regard I would have second thoughts if she has current reviews already posted.
Now, it could be a case where the provider does not normally do doubles and she doesn't want that broadcast. If that's the case, I would forgo the review.  

The questions I have is does she have a "no review policy" on her website and did you find her on TER?

Cannonhome1 916 reads
posted
10 / 76

She does ask for no reviews on her website and I did find her on TER. As far as I can see, she advertises on a few select sites like 411. She must be doing okay the way she is conducting business but it's a shame I can't tell you guys about her.

Also, I'm sorry that I didn't make it clear. I try to put this in my posts but it's not every time. It was a solo date for hubby and I did not participate. Only dropped him off and picked him up. I did see her however when I waited to make sure everything was a go and then afterwards got all the good details.

Panthera12 745 reads
posted
11 / 76

Providers with a no review policy should not benefit from TER while requesting not to be reviewed.  

Of course, I would honor the request since it was stated on her website. No question.

joecarter 732 reads
posted
12 / 76

I saw two ladies recently for multi-hour dates. Both ladies had really good TER ratings but neither performed anywhere near what I would have expected.  Both were advertised on TER, seemed to be high end by virtue of theitr posts, ads and web-sites and both had really good scores.  I suspect that they are protecting their good scores don't want reviews now as they will decrease those scores.  I have a history of giving very good scores when they are deserved and being somewhat charitable when needed.
I am conflicted, on one hand I feel almost ripped off but am not sure if it is enough to not respect their wishes.  On the other, I feel a responsibility to let others know but I really don't need the hassle of a pissed-off diva

no_email 3 Reviews 607 reads
posted
13 / 76

but to get to the point of frustration over this.

 
After vaguely reading the thread it sounds like -

1. You were not there

2. a good time was had

3. The lady has reviews, advertises on this site(giving her adequate exposure)

 
What do you want the end result to be?

no_email 3 Reviews 697 reads
posted
14 / 76

if a provider had a no review policy on her website, and still advertised here?

 
She certainly would not benefit  from TER. Would you still honor the request.

 
CH1, has me frustrated. :-D

Panthera12 612 reads
posted
15 / 76

Also if there is a bait and switch scenario, all bets are off.  

I do realize that some providers have a no review policy and it is not for nefarious reasons. Those requests will be honored.

Cannonhome1 844 reads
posted
16 / 76

I would have PREFERRED to write a review. But since that is not happening, I guess I would like to offer the information through back channels. That would be a good end result. Then I feel as if I have given back to the community that has helped hubby enjoy the hobby safely and find a terrific provider.

no_email 3 Reviews 667 reads
posted
17 / 76

as the thread seemed to revolve around a good experiences vs bad.

 
You did raise the valid point of, advertising on a review site(which also hosts ads) while requesting a no review policy

Panthera12 517 reads
posted
18 / 76

Ultimately, it is our decision to write them or not. If you don't want reviews, delist yourself and you won't have to worry about them.  
TER's policy of "one has a right to review" is spot on. This is a review site after all.

no_email 3 Reviews 702 reads
posted
19 / 76

and going through back channel is a good way to get the info out.

 
The only thing is you're a third party. You would only be providing what hubby has relayed to you.

 
...of course it's never a bad idea to get the info out to any interested party.

Cannonhome1 491 reads
posted
20 / 76

From my perspective, this is a give and take board. I took a lot of advice and feel it appropriate to offer something back.  

As far as this particular provider, she has solid scores and reviews but not many of them. I almost discounted her because of that. Another review could be helpful to others in this circumstance. Alas, I'll just have to leave well enough alone.

skarphedin 495 reads
posted
21 / 76
bludive_1 700 reads
posted
22 / 76

If the back channel info that you choose to share is not a whole lot different from any other info out there..what would be your point ??

Posted By: Cannonhome1
I would have PREFERRED to write a review. But since that is not happening, I guess I would like to offer the information through back channels. That would be a good end result. Then I feel as if I have given back to the community that has helped hubby enjoy the hobby safely and find a terrific provider.

bludive_1 315 reads
posted
24 / 76

VERY good points Katherine.  What's astonishing to me is this:  guys come here and reveal all kinds of information about providers (that they have met at least once, possibly more and have gotten to know) to a bunch of total strangers that they know nothing about!!  I don't care how many reviews a guy has "offered to the community" ..he may be a complete ass in real life & to give up info to this potential ass of a man when a provider specifically states her wishes for no reviews,  is nothing short of disrespectful and just plain wrong.  

I know of a "hobbyist" who writes a fair amount of  reviews (mostly all negative) and in his "real life" he abuses his wife and uses unethical practices in his business (rips people off!)  So, you think that simply because he has "established" himself on a sex board he deserves any kind of loyalty & respect?!?! Offering lots of reviews and contributions to sex / back channel boards does NOT make someone a trustworthy or nice guy…period!

You all need to think about who might actually be on the other end of the computers.  You do your homework when it comes to which providers you see it's too bad you aren't just as diligent with whom you give information to!
Posted By: KatherineCourtesan
I think you missed some of my points...  
   
 Some of us CAN'T de-list ourselves because TER won't allow it because of that "right to review" (unless we completely stop working aka no ads, no website, etc). I don't know how other girls have de-listed their selves despite this, but I'm guessing that most of us are out of luck here. Therefore, it's out of our control if we still work in this industry but don't desire reviews. We can only make requests and wishes for it.  
   
 Yes, ultimately it is a client's decision whether to review or not when looking from a basic legal view...but an ethical one? If a provider specifically requests that you don't review her but you do it anyway because you have the "right to review", don't you think that this stands more as an ethical issue than a legal one? A certain trust is broken when that happens and it doesn't bode well for the relationship you have with your provider.  

-- Modified on 11/11/2013 2:54:21 PM
-- Modified on 11/11/2013 12:27:22 PM

skarphedin 626 reads
posted
26 / 76
skarphedin 426 reads
posted
27 / 76
Panthera12 472 reads
posted
28 / 76

before diving in head first. This is a review board, dumb ass.

Panthera12 517 reads
posted
29 / 76

with those who ask, but will NOT publish a review. Can you see the difference? Oh, hell, I'll explain further. She tells Panthera12 who the provider is. Although Panthera12 has a photographic memory, it will be so inconsequential that he will actually forget after a few months because he doesn't really give a rat's ass but he is always curious (it's in my DNA).  

If she writes a review 10,000 people will see it this week and it will forever be published somewhere on the internet.  

Follow?

My_New_Alias 862 reads
posted
30 / 76

Wait a couple of months and then review under your alias.

sweetnicole1 See my TER Reviews 705 reads
posted
31 / 76

you weren't there!
That's pretty simple.
And everything went well so why do you feel the need to go against her wishes.

You may not be privy to all her reasons why so leave it alone.

London Rayne See my TER Reviews 345 reads
posted
32 / 76

I think I have enough at this point lol...in fact, after 4 pages, I had enough. I realize a guy does not need my permission to write a review, but if my service was outstanding he is going to respect my wishes. If it sucked, he has every right to call me out. My latest review is a double's one, so it's not on my regular profile, and I prefer it that way. Said guy wanted to write me a review and then just add the girl so it would appear on MY profile only, and I said no, you can't really do that.

London Rayne See my TER Reviews 355 reads
posted
33 / 76

Christ. We start getting women who do not spend all day bragging about their credits and their 10s, and this is how we treat them? Cmon guys. I think this one is a keeper. She has also not tossed out her damn link in every post like so many others, so the advertising routine is a bit much. She answered a question...period.

skarphedin 338 reads
posted
34 / 76

It appears that she wants this place (which she doesn't own etc) to conform to her policy preferences. But that is just unrealistic. The silly part is that she doesn't understand that this place was created and still exists and is as large as it is precisely because it does not conform to her policy preferences.... Hell, it doesn't conform to most of mine either...  

"Ahhh...this is where TER's intended purpose of legitimizing a provider goes beyond and into a more social setting. If we look at things from that perspective now, then I ask again - why does it bother you so much that you can't write about her?"  

"Some of us just don't want to have so many reviews. As mentioned earlier in these postings, TER was created to help legitimize providers as opposed to have a gush fest so if the lady already has reviews, why is it so wrong to try to limit them?"

"There is also the question of why men feel the need to write reviews in the first place if she's already been validated and has plenty of reviews to understand what she is like. It seems to me that TER is more of a social place where if you write reviews, you're in the "club". (That, or you just want to get another month's free membership but that quickly overrides respecting her wishes). This need to "tell everyone about her" when she requests to not have any reviews comes from a completely selfish level. I don't mean selfish in a terrible negative way, but who would benefit from the review? Sure, it might help her own business but it would have been against her wishes. That, and I don't think the person in question wants to write a review in order to help her business grow as there was no mention of that at all. It just seems more like a yearning to be part of the "club". Kiss and tell. Gossip, even? "  

That last one especially... It's like she can't connect the dots...  

I get how industry captures the regulator. I really do. And I understand her reasons for advocating as she does. It would be very much in her self-interest if this site conformed to her policy preferences. But she doesn't appear to have any understanding of why this place was created and why it exists. She comes off as naive and silly to me. I could be wrong. Do you agree with her?

-- Modified on 11/12/2013 10:43:29 AM

skarphedin 517 reads
posted
35 / 76
skarphedin 314 reads
posted
36 / 76

Atty X goes to an independent web-site where atty's are reviewed and clients can communicate and discuss their experiences. Atty X then goes to the forum and posting as Atty X with a link to her reviews (which are very good and also contain links to her advertising) then argues that the site is for the benefit of the Atty's and that the clients should be satisfied with whatever level of participation the Atty's desire and that anything more is an imposition on them and unethical. Atty X then goes on to argue that his/her own policy preferences are that any reviews beyond what is necessary for the "legitimation" of an Atty as an Atty are excessive and that discussion of Atty's beyond said legitimation on the boards amounts to kissing and telling and gossip and social bonding.

Client Y then says she is being silly, unreasonable and shallow and also advertising.  

Atty Z (an outspoken member of the boards and frequent critic of her fellow Attys and user of the boards in ways that exceed Atty X's preferences) then criticizes Client Y for attacking Atty X

skarphedin 532 reads
posted
37 / 76
sweetnicole1 See my TER Reviews 785 reads
posted
38 / 76

you clearly stated YOU wanted to post a review.
YOU said that in your first post.
HOW YOU wanted to post a review. you never said Hubby would you said YOU!

so bitchy or not YOU said it so Im no mind reader sweetheart.
Just the arrogance of wanting to disreguard the gals wishes to begin with is crap.

Jeesh!!!

Cannonhome1 980 reads
posted
39 / 76

out of hand. I've clearly said that a review will not be written... in fact never said it would, just wanted to. And obviously I wasn't in the room so that means if a review would have been written -***and it will not be*** - hubby would be the author. That would have been our contribution to the community.

Cannonhome1 725 reads
posted
40 / 76

We've gone way over and beyond to make sure this provider had a nice time in our area. And I'm not talking about the date. We - I - have done nothing to disrespect her. Just the opposite. Just got ANOTHER email from her thanking me again.  

I felt frustrated about the no review policy and said so. Then the whole thread turns into this battle over who's right it is to post a review. Enough already. Not trying to start a war here.

bludive_1 372 reads
posted
41 / 76

With that attitude, you need some lessons in respect.

Posted By: Panthera12
Ultimately, it is our decision to write them or not. If you don't want reviews, delist yourself and you won't have to worry about them.  
 TER's policy of "one has a right to review" is spot on. This is a review site after all.  

bludive_1 370 reads
posted
42 / 76

She is getting attacked because she is asserting herself and many of these hobbyists seem to think that they are the ones in control and "who the hell are WE to speak up about anything?!"  It might be your RIGHT to post reviews but it is also your responsibility as a REAL MAN and a DECENT HUMAN BEING to pay attention to, and respect what the ladies prefer or REQUIRE.    You pay for the services that we offer but you don't get to decide how we decide to protect our privacy & safety!!

Posted By: London Rayne
Christ. We start getting women who do not spend all day bragging about their credits and their 10s, and this is how we treat them? Cmon guys. I think this one is a keeper. She has also not tossed out her damn link in every post like so many others, so the advertising routine is a bit much. She answered a question...period.

bludive_1 561 reads
posted
43 / 76

Get the F over yourself.  Arrogance and know it-all pissy boy personas are flat out annoying

bludive_1 739 reads
posted
44 / 76

Why are so "frustrated over the no review policy?"  Why do you care?!  You had a good time, nothing negative needed to be reported to warn your peers…so move the frig on and get over it!!  This is what you call anal retentive, control, ego issues!  Damn, where are all the REAL men?!  

Posted By: Cannonhome1
We've gone way over and beyond to make sure this provider had a nice time in our area. And I'm not talking about the date. We - I - have done nothing to disrespect her. Just the opposite. Just got ANOTHER email from her thanking me again.  
   
 I felt frustrated about the no review policy and said so. Then the whole thread turns into this battle over who's right it is to post a review. Enough already. Not trying to start a war here.

skarphedin 556 reads
posted
45 / 76

Posted By: bludive_1
Get the F over yourself.  Arrogance and know it-all pissy boy personas are flat out annoying!  
   
 

skarphedin 460 reads
posted
46 / 76
tg_baby 447 reads
posted
47 / 76

It's about privacy and discretion.  

For about $25...ANYONE can read the details of our reviews. And do whatever they want with that information.

I was stalked and outed. I had screenshots of my reviews sent to my family, boss, and co-workers.

Now, I state a preference for no reviews on my site. And if the guy asks me (as has happened a few times), I'll state the same. However, dudes can and will do whatever they want. So be it.

There are great reasons NOT to be reviewed that have nothing to do with giving bad service. I have plenty of repeat clients (which, helps offset the reduction in business I got after I had to take all reviews down and start over). Some of them have offered to write reviews and I've asked them not to.  

Some girls simply aren't comfortable with the increased exposure, and the level of details in reviews. Others, like me, have been burned. Still others just prefer the 'type' of client who they think doesn't review (that's in their heads as far as I'm concerned).

Guys can do whatever they want...but it's respectful to the girl to heed her wishes - unless, as has been said, she just wants to hide bad service.

skarphedin 358 reads
posted
48 / 76

Not that it matters, but I respect your position. Heck, I dig most all your posts. But your position is not what has been discussed above.  

If a woman uses the site to benefit her business, and the review system and the message boards, then it's silly to say that the use of the site is only appropriate to the extent and in the way she wants it used.

What use is a review site where the reviewed parties get to select which reviews get posted?  

Where am I wrong?  



-- Modified on 11/12/2013 5:57:47 PM

sweetnicole1 See my TER Reviews 574 reads
posted
49 / 76

of bad service...and she requests to not review her, whats the point.
her husband had a good time...theres nothing new to report.

she shouldn't concern herself with the whys and why nots, thats the providers business and not her concern.
Out of respect for the lady do as she wishes.
If you are wanting to write a review to build a web presence then ask her if she will whitelist you.
Obviously she has nothing to hide and most likely a steady following and doesn't need the exposure a new review brings.

Im guessing your husband will p4p again maybe the next lady will be happy to have a review.

Its all about respect on both sides.
If you go against her requests don't ask for a refs, but if you do as she asks she could be a great refs in the future.


tg_baby 367 reads
posted
50 / 76

But the way I interpreted it, it was about reviews getting posted, altogether.  

A girl might ask for no additional reviews to be posted...I think that's what London meant.  

The reason a girl doesn't want reviews might not be obvious...but good reviews are usually so beneficial to business that a girl won't eschew them without a good reason.

skarphedin 398 reads
posted
51 / 76

The relevant discussion was about whether or not providers should have the right and/or ability to selectively control what gets posted about them...  

In your post, you mention stalking and outing. That's not really relevant, is it?  

And, it makes it very easy for the casual reader to think TG is talking about stalking and outing and this guy is disagreeing with her, why does he want men to be able ot stalk and out women etc...?  

All I've said is that if you opt into the review system, then you opt into the review system. To opt in and then argue (especially using the name you benefit under) that it is unfair I can't completely control the system is silly.

skarphedin 572 reads
posted
52 / 76

I'm not saying it is easy, but how else can a review system be useful?

skarphedin 373 reads
posted
53 / 76
London Rayne See my TER Reviews 413 reads
posted
54 / 76

If a gal is using the No Review thing because she sucks, damn right review her, but if a guy loves his time with her and she was as promised in every way, why would he go against her wishes to write the very SAME shit that has been said 100 times, if he has nothing NEW to add? After you have like 30 damn reviews, the rest are pretty much repetitive bs unless she starts doing new services, in which case she might only have done that with HIM, and does not want you to know about it.  

There is nothing against the rules of asking certain people not to review you for doing x, y, and z. They can omit or not review at all. Many guys ask if we want a review, so we do not have to say yes. That's absurd.

London Rayne See my TER Reviews 687 reads
posted
55 / 76

How is that shallow or silly, when MANY women agree? I don't want 200 reviews either...EVER, so you say I can't use TER because of that? That's nuts. She HAS REVIEWS...many women simply want to keep the NUMBER down to appear more low volume. Duh, it aint all that sinister lol. Do I think every time a post appears it's advertising? Nope, sure don't. Not when no one can even access my photos or information without a password, and I am a bitch to boot. If I were here for your money and approval, I would be a lot nicer. You're welcome. FYI, you don't even have to use your provider name to post...many women here are using an alias, so how is that advertising when we don't know who the hell they are?  

There was not reason to call her names for posting her opinion, which was mild compared to the shit I post. It's not your board either, and many men prefer to see women who don't have pages upon pages of reviews. She never once said she had  a NO review policy...she just does not want hundreds of them. That is NOT against the rules btw.

-- Modified on 11/12/2013 6:43:31 PM

sweetnicole1 See my TER Reviews 687 reads
posted
56 / 76

Im not angry    stop projecting.

London Rayne See my TER Reviews 341 reads
posted
57 / 76

Are you smoking crack? I have 10 pages of reviews that say every guy gets a bbbj, cim, and a hell of a lot more every time. Do you really need to read the EXACT same shit again, or do you only want to know if I started taking up a drug habit or gained 20 lbs.? Get real. I concede to reviews being necessary when shit changes, not just for number effect. There is no need for a person with over 40 reviews to KEEP getting more and more if she does not want to. Many women like 1 new review a month to show they are still active and on point...not for a higher ranking on the damn Top List.

London Rayne See my TER Reviews 577 reads
posted
58 / 76

You tell him, girl. Ha ha ha. Fk you bitches. This one is my incoming!

London Rayne See my TER Reviews 648 reads
posted
59 / 76

For those of you who know her and have followed her posts, she has spent a great deal of time using this site as a tool, asking questions for help, and felt like she OWED the site a damn review...is that so hard to grasp? I can't be the only person who figured that shit out and I am not even drunk yet. You bitches let me e send you a drink lol. Oh, and yah there was a tiny detail about some location issues that other mongers might have wanted to know.

Panthera12 661 reads
posted
60 / 76

Forget it. I already know who, but damn why don't you go out and get laid or something?  

All she wanted to do was convey that she/THEY are unable to reciprocate to everyone who has helped them along (myself excluded) because I didn't give her any advice. Seriously, don't be like me and pick apart her posts. It makes you look like an old pantherette without real claws.

tg_baby 394 reads
posted
61 / 76

It's a rather obvious downside to the exposure we receive on this site. Sometimes guys don't realize that what they post online can have wider repercussions...and a wider audience than well-meaning potential clients. This site is the best resource for info about a girl...if a guy (client, stalker, ex-husband) wants the skinny on a girl, he will eventually wind up HERE.  

I didn't read London or bluedive's posts the way that you did. It's natural for a girl to be concerned about what's posted about her online. Just because a girl 'opts in' doesn't mean she has to tolerate personal details being leaked, or can't refuse further reviews if she wants to limit her exposure (as London is doing w/her locked site, etc). I don't think either girl wants to control the system or manipulate the system, though.  

For me, the issue is that a guy should think before he posts anything online that will basically be public domain...how would you feel if we posted reviews of you? Especially if we spoke of your specific career path and named your highly unique favorite song...and described your build in the terms of the workout regimen you told us you were following?

And as to London's point...would 4 be OK? But what about 400? At that point, it does get redundant and kind of embarrassing (just my personal opinion/comfort level...honestly, my hats are off to the women who have so many because I could never handle it).


-- Modified on 11/12/2013 5:36:37 PM

Panthera12 833 reads
posted
62 / 76

You are still hanging out on this thread for some reason and it's not because you are happy. Go home and sleep it off.

tg_baby 553 reads
posted
63 / 76

She can always express a preference for no further reviews to be written...and a guy can choose to disregard that preference and write one. Simple.

It's kind of like trying to play for both teams at one time, I'll give you that...wanting to benefit from existing reviews while not having any more written.  

But a girl shouldn't have to put up with something that makes her uncomfortable...again, it's on the guy whether or not he respects that.  

Most girls just tolerate reviews...they bring in the $$$$ to be sure, but very few really LIKE having it all over the web how some guy banged the shit out of her ladybits and how she gave his balls a good licking and swallowed his cum. So if she's in a position where she doesn't NEED the exposure...yea, she's gonna ask 'PLEASE dear god, do not post that sh** about me!' Now if she's new and needs $, she'll say the opposite...but mind  change over time, and just because someone 'opts in' they shouldn't have to stay in. That's like saying that if you give guys BBFS at first then realize it's stupid, you have to keep doing it because you 'opted in.'  

It's not such a big deal...it's just the girl's preference. If you are satisfied with the service...then respect it. If not...write a review to warn others. Not too hard.

-- Modified on 11/12/2013 5:47:34 PM

London Rayne See my TER Reviews 407 reads
posted
64 / 76

Correct on all counts. Bottom line, we don't have to ASK clients not to review us after the fact, because the guys we might refuse to see are the ones still writing reviews lol. I've never had a guy review me against my wishes unless I did something sinister, and I never have. In fact, most guys I meet are from TER and they still ASK if I need another review, like I need another spray tan this week. It is redundant. Sure, I would love a few more 10s to up the score, but get crucial. I am retiring in less than a year. I don't have a "no review" policy or anything...it just happens I have not had one in a month or so...that's normal for me though. I don't work all that much. I just think men who insist on doing things that could potentially harm a provider they 'CLAIM' to care about, are fkin assholes.

London Rayne See my TER Reviews 696 reads
posted
65 / 76

This post says it all, and yes Nicole there is ONE detail that might be of use to the guys here looking to hire said provider. In fact, she posted about it on the Newbie board. She just wants to give back to the very people who literally spoon fed her detail for detail on screening, set up, LE, and gosh knows what else for MONTHS before this date happened. Hell, the guys should be grateful, because that is why they are here...for reviews.  

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=644444&boardID=12&page=1#644444

skarphedin 367 reads
posted
66 / 76

Do you think and atty who has your stance would be reasonable?  

I know you don't want 200 reviews, it isn't conducive to your business model. But you do want the benefit of reviews. You just want control of the review process. I get that, but if you were a client of a professional being reviewed I do not think you would feel the same way.  

You are being disingenuous about advertising. Your board persona (whether or not it is your real personality) is part of your marketing scheme.  

Women who post using an alias are not advertising if the alias is effective. If you had made all your posts under an effective alias, you would not have as much business...  

And I never implied or said that asking for no reviews was against the rules...  

What names did I call her

skarphedin 532 reads
posted
67 / 76

Why do you post under an alias?  

Why does she not?  

Why does she want to control the review process?

skarphedin 322 reads
posted
68 / 76

There is a difference between reviewing someone and mistreating them as you described. The two are not the same. And, reviewing someone honestly is not advocating or abetting misbehavior. It just isn't.  

Your argument is actually aimed at the very concept of TER. You are questioning whether a review site for escorts should exist due to the danger it represents to providers. That is a reasonable question and reasonable people could disagree on the answer.  

But, what LR and KCourtesan are arguing for is that reviews are good and that the risks are worth it but we want the ability and the right to have the review process run on our terms and for our maximum profit and if it is not it is immoral or gossip etc... That is what I think is silly. Opting into the review system is an acceptance of the benefits and detriments...

skarphedin 392 reads
posted
69 / 76
skarphedin 435 reads
posted
71 / 76

I think if you want the benefit of reviews you get the downside too... A controlled and limited downside with an avenue for correction.  

What else is LR advocating than a review system on her terms?  

Clients are reviewed and it is appropriate to do so in my opinion. If there are the same controls...  

As you say, 400 is your opinion. Why should your opinion trump another's (sp?)

tg_baby 401 reads
posted
73 / 76

it's not 'opt-in'. Many girls have no idea they even have reviews. We get them without ever agreeing to any terms.

I'm not against TER, or reviews. I'm not questioning at all whether it should exist. I like the site..it's a necessary 'evil', although I'm using that term loosely...obviously I enjoy it here :-)

I just don't think guys have the right to post whatever they want to about whomever they want. Even TER agrees...guys are not supposed to post personal info or location, but they do all the time. But that's not even half of it...

It's also not TER's fault when reviews are used to blackmail a girl (or anyone else).  

It's just a matter of respect on the guy's part. And a matter of considering *from the standpoint of privacy, safety, and dignity* the girl's point of view before something is posted.  

Some guys do actually care whether a girl wants a review or not...they don't want to stress her out if  she's trying to go UTR and has 50 goonheads suddenly NEEDING to see her. Of course, that would only apply to the girls who actually do give good service.

You're trying to paint it black and white, but it's not.  


-- Modified on 11/12/2013 6:50:35 PM

Panthera12 479 reads
posted
74 / 76

and have obviously never written one, your two cents with inflation means that I don't give a shit. I would have thought that you had learned this by now honey.

skarphedin 321 reads
posted
75 / 76

And once someone asked. It makes me uncomfortable. Even then, I wouldn't review without asking and haven't. But this isn't about me. Well, I think one post is about me... And, I'm not someone who thinks you all have an easy road to wealth in front of you, far from it. I understand that this is a different profession than anything else as far as personal risk... I get that the initial reviews for a woman on this site are rarely known of before hand... I also understand why a woman would want to control what gets posted: it makes sense. I also understand that de-listing is a pain in the ass.  

But, I still think it is silly to actively use the site for profit (opt-in) and run a business model that is not UTR and then make a big deal about being reviewed per the rules and especially when it is in a positive manner.  

Moreover, additional reviews per the rules don't really increase the risks very much. Once the first few went up the risk was there and wasn't getting much bigger. And, no one has argued that TER should put any additional rules in place to limit the risks you speak of... The system is massive and works and unless you opt-out, I think it fair to say you opt-in...

It's like celebrity, a double edged sword, you use the system and you get negative repercussions along with the good... Keeping in mind that the system allows one to make more $$$.  

I can say I've thought about this and I still think that one who profits from the reviews and the system should accept the fact that one is going to be reviewed.

skarphedin 582 reads
posted
76 / 76

I get that guys are reviewed. It makes me very uncomfortable. But I see why it is done and know I live in a glass house and hope I have never claimed otherwise. But, TER was the only way I could get to see quality women in my area. So, I opted-in. It will prob fck me eventually, if this thread hasn't already... But, I kinda made that choice...  

I don't claim to be a handsome man, be a great lover, have hair or be in any kind of shape. I was however in fantastic shape in the past and took the time to learn about how it is done. I really don't work out that much anymore (it's obvious) or watch my diet (again obvious) and I hope I didn't come across to any women as thinking or claiming that I did. That would have been silly. I need to and kick my own ass for not doing it but I really hope I didn't act like I thought I was king stud anymore...  

And that is a great song, but wasn't my favorite, just an obsession. My new favorite/obsession is Would you love me by Matthew E White.

Register Now!