that said a Fav lady has a couple but they are rather faded & unobtrusive.  I find a woman attractive & I'm not into the porn look.  I don't want to be distracted by body art.  All tis said, it is hard to know in advance...  even if one knows a provider has some tattoos, if they will be objectionable to me.  If there are photos which show them & I don't care for them, then NO, I'd not book with her.
skb

a canvas. No tats, and no piercings.

I have seen women with quite a few of them that I could overlook. I personally don't understand the desire myself. To each his/her their own!

It is not a deal breaker either way, but nicely done and artistic tats add an element of kink that I find arousing.

there are so many mediocre to bad tattoo jobs....

BAD tattoos are a huge turn off for me.

none, small and discreet, or large and exceptionally artistic are equally good as far as i am concerned.

but a lot of work of lesser quality is not appealing. the more work there is the better it had be.....

It's all about how it looks.

I guess when I wear a somewhat padded bra that counts as the same, yes? You bring up an interesting point though, for me at least. I have major ink, all on my back, and they are airbrushed out of my pictures. Only because of discretionary reasons. I don't show my face in pictures, and if someone I knew saw my tats in the pics, it would be really obvious it was me, rendering my pictures useless as far as discretion was concerned.

But so far, I haven't had anyone be totally turned off, distracted or offended by my tattoos. Or they could've been good at hiding such responses. I've actually had many men who I knew hated tattoos then turn around and like mine, or be turned on by them, or even just suprised by them general as according to them, I don't "seem the type". I suppose that could be acting as well, but hey.. I'll take it!

So I'm curious..... what do you guys think when the girl gets nekkid and suprise!...she has tattoos that weren't in her photos. Especially big ones. Are you offended? Do you feel ripped off? Do you feel like she did not represent herself honestly and appropriately? Do you even give a shit? Does it just depend on the situation? I'd love to hear some opinions!

DITTO here!!!!!!!

If you will see a lady based on her not having any tattoos or piercings?Is either one of these dealbreakers for you?I had a gentleman who I saw who told me he is turned off by tattoos.I have a tattoo which it does say in my profile so I was wondering if it was a turn-off why pick me?Just wanted to know your thoughts on this everyone feel free to respond.Thank You

The worst is a lot of bad tattoos, but I don't really care when deciding who to see. I have a tattoo myself, but I still prefer no tattoos on girls. I like the clean look.

she is the lady in the pics which drove me to see her initially.  Many of the ladies I have seen have had tattoos and this has not been a problem in my enjoying her company.  Piercings can also enhance the session and I, for one, enjoy the pierced look.  In most cases they are placed in strategic locations that I find erotic.

Depends. Small ones are fine. Large works of body art tend to turn me off. Thats just my personal preference

I don't like tattoos but they are not that big a deal to me. Piercings on the other hand can be a deal breaker if she will not remove them. Piercings on the clit can tear  condoms and skin increasing STD risks. And if her tits are pierced who would want to suck on them. I find both tattoos and piercing detract from the looks of the lady.

Finding a provider without tattoos is akin to trying to find a virgin. I jest but, overall, it is highly subjective on my part: it depends on the lady, the amount/type of tattoos and peircings, personality, body type, etc... IMHO, smoking during a session would be a deal breaker, not tattoos.

I look at the entire person, as best as possible. I have yet to be with a heavily inked lady but, I am looking forward to the possibility. If a provider has a tattoo of the Last Supper or the Mona Lisa on her back, that could be distracting.

No nip, tongue/lip/ mouth area, and pussy piercings. When I snatch a kiss and vice-versa I do not want a mouth full of metal. ear and belly button Ok.

Thank you
2010 = 28

Piercings don't bother me...within reason.  For example, Pierced Ears?  Same thing, but socially accepted. I don't particularly care for pierced noses, hate the lip and tongue deal, and haven't yet run into the lower lip version.

I REALLY HATE having tatoos air-brushed out.  False Advertising!!

BUT!!!!  For some strange reason, I am CRAZY about pierced nipples.  I don't even know why. But I'm quite sure that if two girls were identical twins (10/10's of course), and one had pierced nips and the other one did not?  I'd go with the pierced version.

Now, explain that!!!!

Small ink hiding in secret places or full sleeves and back pieces, I like ink.

What I don't like is the same old same old, unless it really is old. A butterfly on the shoulder that's 15 years old is cool. If it's two months old.....

like tats, good tats even better. Cheesy ones look bad but I still wouldn't say it is a turn off. Good tats can, however, be a turn on.

It's common knowledge that white-collar professional gentlemen prefer ladies who have no tattoos. Tatoos are frowned upon in conversative work environments.  Yet, several escorts smart multiple or gigantic tatoos as if they were ladies of the Yakuza clan, Hongkong Triads, or Russian mafia.

What is ironic is that these ladies claim they only like to see "upscale" white-collar professional gentlemen.  Well, a lot of upscale gents prefer no tattoos and no piercing and no goth look.
Ladies, if you like to attract Trucker guys and Scruffy Biker Dudes, put as much tatoo on your body as you can.

I will pay any lady an extra $100 per hour if she has Zero Tattoo !

Being new to the hobby, and an older gentleman as well, I never thought I'd get into the whole tattoo/piercing thing (alternative).  To me, it had too much of a "biker chick" vibe.  That is until I met with a highly regarded provider in DC named Samantha.  She has a full-length butterfly tattoo on her back, and in several other places, and pierced nipples as well.  But instead of looking cheap and tawdry, the effect was more of living/breathing art.  Of course, the canvas was incredible to begin with too.  And her service was first-class all the way.  Without a doubt, she is one of the classiest ladies I've ever met.  I guess this old dog can still learn a thing or two yet.

-- Modified on 8/14/2010 8:24:17 PM

now having numerous artless tatoos is a turn off

but it seems right and proper to me that a provider should have at least one "tramp stamp"

One of my favorites, cliche though it be, is "daddy's little girl", somewhere on the lower back
or backside....

of course I'd also enjoy "delivers in the rear" ....

I don't give a fuck about your tat. I just want to see you!

Your art-work will have no interference, as far as I'm concerned.

You know I see ladies that have tats!

I rather not see tattoos but it's no big deal to me. Those with originality are better.

On the other hand, piercings turn me off, especially for clit, nipples. tongue and anywhere on the face. I hate to have teeth knocked out.