Highly subjective but too many tattoos is deal breaker to me. IMHO
I look at the entire person, as best as possible. I have yet to be with a heavily inked lady but, I am looking forward to the possibility. If a provider has a tattoo of the Last Supper or the Mona Lisa on her back, that could be distracting.
If you will see a lady based on her not having any tattoos or piercings?Is either one of these dealbreakers for you?I had a gentleman who I saw who told me he is turned off by tattoos.I have a tattoo which it does say in my profile so I was wondering if it was a turn-off why pick me?Just wanted to know your thoughts on this everyone feel free to respond.Thank You
The worst is a lot of bad tattoos, but I don't really care when deciding who to see. I have a tattoo myself, but I still prefer no tattoos on girls. I like the clean look.
Finding a provider without tattoos is akin to trying to find a virgin. I jest but, overall, it is highly subjective on my part: it depends on the lady, the amount/type of tattoos and peircings, personality, body type, etc... IMHO, smoking during a session would be a deal breaker, not tattoos.
I look at the entire person, as best as possible. I have yet to be with a heavily inked lady but, I am looking forward to the possibility. If a provider has a tattoo of the Last Supper or the Mona Lisa on her back, that could be distracting.
Highly subjective but too many tattoos is deal breaker to me. IMHO
I look at the entire person, as best as possible. I have yet to be with a heavily inked lady but, I am looking forward to the possibility. If a provider has a tattoo of the Last Supper or the Mona Lisa on her back, that could be distracting.
she is the lady in the pics which drove me to see her initially. Many of the ladies I have seen have had tattoos and this has not been a problem in my enjoying her company. Piercings can also enhance the session and I, for one, enjoy the pierced look. In most cases they are placed in strategic locations that I find erotic.
that said a Fav lady has a couple but they are rather faded & unobtrusive. I find a woman attractive & I'm not into the porn look. I don't want to be distracted by body art. All tis said, it is hard to know in advance... even if one knows a provider has some tattoos, if they will be objectionable to me. If there are photos which show them & I don't care for them, then NO, I'd not book with her.
skb
Depends. Small ones are fine. Large works of body art tend to turn me off. Thats just my personal preference
I don't like tattoos but they are not that big a deal to me. Piercings on the other hand can be a deal breaker if she will not remove them. Piercings on the clit can tear condoms and skin increasing STD risks. And if her tits are pierced who would want to suck on them. I find both tattoos and piercing detract from the looks of the lady.
a canvas. No tats, and no piercings.
I have seen women with quite a few of them that I could overlook. I personally don't understand the desire myself. To each his/her their own!
It is not a deal breaker either way, but nicely done and artistic tats add an element of kink that I find arousing.
No nip, tongue/lip/ mouth area, and pussy piercings. When I snatch a kiss and vice-versa I do not want a mouth full of metal. ear and belly button Ok.
Thank you
2010 = 28
Piercings don't bother me...within reason. For example, Pierced Ears? Same thing, but socially accepted. I don't particularly care for pierced noses, hate the lip and tongue deal, and haven't yet run into the lower lip version.
I REALLY HATE having tatoos air-brushed out. False Advertising!!
BUT!!!! For some strange reason, I am CRAZY about pierced nipples. I don't even know why. But I'm quite sure that if two girls were identical twins (10/10's of course), and one had pierced nips and the other one did not? I'd go with the pierced version.
Now, explain that!!!!
I guess when I wear a somewhat padded bra that counts as the same, yes? You bring up an interesting point though, for me at least. I have major ink, all on my back, and they are airbrushed out of my pictures. Only because of discretionary reasons. I don't show my face in pictures, and if someone I knew saw my tats in the pics, it would be really obvious it was me, rendering my pictures useless as far as discretion was concerned.
But so far, I haven't had anyone be totally turned off, distracted or offended by my tattoos. Or they could've been good at hiding such responses. I've actually had many men who I knew hated tattoos then turn around and like mine, or be turned on by them, or even just suprised by them general as according to them, I don't "seem the type". I suppose that could be acting as well, but hey.. I'll take it!
So I'm curious..... what do you guys think when the girl gets nekkid and suprise!...she has tattoos that weren't in her photos. Especially big ones. Are you offended? Do you feel ripped off? Do you feel like she did not represent herself honestly and appropriately? Do you even give a shit? Does it just depend on the situation? I'd love to hear some opinions!
But so far, I haven't had anyone be totally turned off, distracted or offended by my tattoos. Or they could've been good at hiding such responses. I've actually had many men who I knew hated tattoos then turn around and like mine, or be turned on by them, or even just suprised by them general as according to them, I don't "seem the type". I suppose that could be acting as well, but hey.. I'll take it!
So I'm curious..... what do you guys think when the girl gets nekkid and suprise!...she has tattoos that weren't in her photos. Especially big ones. Are you offended? Do you feel ripped off? Do you feel like she did not represent herself honestly and appropriately? Do you even give a shit? Does it just depend on the situation? I'd love to hear some opinions!
Doesn't mean you are right or wrong....it's all about what you prefer. Farther down the thread is a post that states that White Collar Professionals generally prefer no tattoos. I concur with that. However....
My greatest disappointment was during a visit to LA. Photos showed a 10 appearance, not a single trace of ink. The girl showed up with, I swear, 25% of her body covered--the largest tat going down her neck and completely covering her shoulder. Bait & Switch? Absolutely....in more ways than one.
I acknowledge that there can always be the situation where a remarkable young lady could have found a one-of-a-kind artist and has created a masterpiece. I feel that I would not be offended, but could be open enough to appreciate the artistic aspect of this creation. Unfortunately, the majority of tattoos you generally see look like they came from Walmart, not Neiman Marcus. And, it seems to me that most girls get one because they are checking a box.....Condoms--check. Lube---check. Tattoo---check.
HOWEVER...as the OP said, my "Preference" is no tattoos. Of the 30+ women I've seen, only 3 or 4 had no tattoos at all. So it doesn't mean it's a deal breaker. Shoot....it would be almost impossible to maintain any kind of hobby consistency if that was the case.
But Again, that's my demographic. It's my preference. I still believe that strategically, if ladies looked at their customer and their preferences, then there would be alot less ink.
Suprisingly enough, I don't especially care for tattoos in general. I rarely see ones I find attractive. I would never in a million years get one on my arm, neck, chest, etc as they usually look trashy to me. Yet obviously that will sound stupid to a lot of people since to a lot of people theres no such thing as a tasteful tattoo.
My profile says I have tattoos, and my website also warns that I have tattoos not visable in my pictures. By no means do I have my entire back covered or anything crazy, but if you showed up expecting a couple of small ones and they were bigger than you thought they'd be, then what? Did you have fair warning ahead of time, or should a lady be more specific?
I'm not a big tattoo person. Don't have any myself. But it generally doesn't bother me. As long as it's not one of those ones that run all up and down her leg, or on the face, or some shit like that.
But yeah, your's were just fine. Besides, I wasn't there to check out your 'art'! 
If I was warned. then there is no problem.
Small ink hiding in secret places or full sleeves and back pieces, I like ink.
What I don't like is the same old same old, unless it really is old. A butterfly on the shoulder that's 15 years old is cool. If it's two months old.....
there are so many mediocre to bad tattoo jobs....
BAD tattoos are a huge turn off for me.
none, small and discreet, or large and exceptionally artistic are equally good as far as i am concerned.
but a lot of work of lesser quality is not appealing. the more work there is the better it had be.....
like tats, good tats even better. Cheesy ones look bad but I still wouldn't say it is a turn off. Good tats can, however, be a turn on.
It's all about how it looks.
It's common knowledge that white-collar professional gentlemen prefer ladies who have no tattoos. Tatoos are frowned upon in conversative work environments. Yet, several escorts smart multiple or gigantic tatoos as if they were ladies of the Yakuza clan, Hongkong Triads, or Russian mafia.
What is ironic is that these ladies claim they only like to see "upscale" white-collar professional gentlemen. Well, a lot of upscale gents prefer no tattoos and no piercing and no goth look.
Ladies, if you like to attract Trucker guys and Scruffy Biker Dudes, put as much tatoo on your body as you can.
I will pay any lady an extra $100 per hour if she has Zero Tattoo !
That's pretty funny.
I'm a retired white collar kind of guy and I love tatts. Most of my friends (white collar guys in their 50s) like tatts, too.
One thing I've learned in this hobby is that people are all strange in their own ways. From the CEO who wants a heavily inked dom to spank him till he shits to the scruffy biker dude who wants a smooth skinned little spinner with no body adornments, taste is individual when the blinds are drawn.
And why the judgmental tone? What do you care if ladies want ink or if people like me enjoy good body art? I guess it's like the old saying- there are two kinds of people. People with tattoos and people who are scared of people with tatoos.
I'm not a Mangina like you, and was just stating a fact based on white-collar guys that have be. So if I don't like it, I tell the ladies I don't like big tats like the Yakuzas.
I don't care what you want or what you like. I was just stating my point. The fact is - you're Not a White-collar now - you're retired. So you are not part of the white collar stats. Let's get that straight. You're blue collar manual labor now for all I care.
I specificially alluded to 'large tattoos' that are similar to the Yakuzas. I don't mind small ones that are not obstrusive.. Lastly, I'm not scared of tattoos.
I come from the no tat part of the hobby. If I see a tat in a provider's ad, my interest in her vanishes. I recently found out that an old fav got tats. She had none when I saw her. She was good, but I won't see her again.
Being new to the hobby, and an older gentleman as well, I never thought I'd get into the whole tattoo/piercing thing (alternative). To me, it had too much of a "biker chick" vibe. That is until I met with a highly regarded provider in DC named Samantha. She has a full-length butterfly tattoo on her back, and in several other places, and pierced nipples as well. But instead of looking cheap and tawdry, the effect was more of living/breathing art. Of course, the canvas was incredible to begin with too. And her service was first-class all the way. Without a doubt, she is one of the classiest ladies I've ever met. I guess this old dog can still learn a thing or two yet.
-- Modified on 8/14/2010 8:24:17 PM
I rather not see tattoos but it's no big deal to me. Those with originality are better.
On the other hand, piercings turn me off, especially for clit, nipples. tongue and anywhere on the face. I hate to have teeth knocked out.
-- Modified on 8/14/2010 8:24:17 PM
now having numerous artless tatoos is a turn off
but it seems right and proper to me that a provider should have at least one "tramp stamp"
One of my favorites, cliche though it be, is "daddy's little girl", somewhere on the lower back
or backside....
of course I'd also enjoy "delivers in the rear" ....
I don't give a fuck about your tat. I just want to see you!
Your art-work will have no interference, as far as I'm concerned.
You know I see ladies that have tats!
You are right, if you had mentioned in your profile, then the gentleman should not have picked you up.
For all your reply gents especially you MP67 everyone has their own views.My tattoo is not big & nicely done.I would agree poorly done tattoos or huge tattoos might be a turn-off.On the other hand I went to an appointment and another provider was there as well she had her right arm covered in tattoos & a few others.Her tattoos were very colorful,but very nicely done I can see how this might turn-off certain individuals.I have had gentleman who are white-collar and they had no problems whatsoever again up to the individual.
Just a few hours of your time, at my expense, will be more than fine!
One small ones discreatly placed and well done is fine. Beyond that it hard for me to return even if it was good.
I prefer no tats but I have had to learn to get past that
but if I see a posting with no tats and no piercings then I am immediately more interested
Piercings other than ears and navel are a deal breaker
is the belly button. Don't care for imposing tattoo's. I'm called Old School for a reason after all.
No preference. Although I have a number of tattoos myself. As far as piercings go, I see them all day and night at work, they are just so commonplace that I don't even really notice anymore. Same thing with the tattoos I guess.
I usually avoid providers with tattoos or piercings. They are a big turn off.
Tattoos are great on my street girls.Makes em look tuffer than they be.I can sleep without wurrying about Elmer Fudd messin wit dem cuz they look like bad ass sailors.
Woodint let my childrens Momma put one on less it was my name.
But I also prefer that a provider show up to outcall looking like a young business woman with no revealing clothing and flats for shoes. I err on the conservative side of the hobby.
I have one on my lower back. I had it done when I was 23 now I'm 44. I have checked into having it removed !! 5 grand WOW alot of money. I do think it was a mistake !! But it's look like it's going to stay !! But I wont ever have another one. But I think on some they are very nice. It's a personal thing I'm sure. But I think its unfair to judge a women for that ! You might be missing out !!!
Piercings and/or tattoos are total turn-offs for me but that's just my opinion, I don't know why someone would object if it's in your profile???
I can handle small tats and a minor piercing. Can't handle earnest talk about astrology.
I think some women look incredibly sexy with tatoos, like Danielle on American Pickers. The same tats on another women could make her look like trash.
Thank You for your honest opinions and stories even the ones that were trying to be wiseguys.Everyone have a great day.
Jaydalee