I'm looking at the top 100 providers, and they got outstanding scores. What stuck out the most is their rates. They charge ridiculous rates. Every once in a while, you'll find a regular provider that charges $350-400 an hour, which is still premium rates, but only a small few that made the list of top 50. However, the majority of the top 100 providers average about $1,000 (I didn't do the math) an hour. Hell, I've even seen some that were $2000 and more an hour.

You can say that they r low volume providers, so they don't have to c many men and can spend more time with the clients to boost their ego. But, they also have multiple reviews as well. For example, a $2000 an hour provider has over 40 reviews.

Whats going on here? Why can't regular girls that charge a good premium IMO at $300 an hour be on those list? Is it that the guys spending the money on these providers too good for their own senses? If the client thinks he spends that much on a provider, then he will automatically have a good time, and in return, his metacognition is affected? What's going on here? How does money make a provider better in terms of services; i.e. increasing her rates drastically for the elites?

R these providers smarter than the $300 providers? Is this a valuable lesson for $300 providers to up-charge to have better sessions and ratings? What does that say about the rest of the providers? Should we expect less from the $300 providers now we know that they will never exceed the $1000 providers in terms of services?

IMO: I have splurge every once in a while, and highest I've ever paid a provider for an hour was $600, and that was my maxing point. Not that I don't have the financials, its just that I can't see myself paying more just for an hour's worth of lust. I mean, what does that make me? Do girls view guys that pay them more as more prestige and in turn try to deliver a better service? So, with the $600 rate I've spent, it was very good. But, at the end of the day, I didn't feel that she was better than the $250-$300 I usually go for. I actually felt a bit cheated and disappointed that I've lost money and haven't gain anything in the process but boosting my ego.

What's really going on here?

Point 1.  Your writing like you're sending a text gives away your real fake name.

Point 2.  You have it backwards.  It's not that regular girls can't be on the list.  The ones that have those consistent high scores have marketed themselves to a different audience that's willing to pay higher rates.  It's easier to please 5 guys per month than 5 guys a day.  If you aren't OK paying high rates, don't.  Some1 will c u.

I was also looking at the 100 top providers list . Yes, there are number who charge around 1,000 an hour or close, but I don't remember anyone charging $2000--maybe for two hours. A number are in the $500 range, which is still pretty common in LA.

One thing I noticed is that not only are these women beautiful, but their service is really tops. Many swallow, do anal, allow bukkake, etc. So you've got beauty and just about everything up to uncovered intercourse. And they either really love what they are doing, or they are excellent actresses, as they make their men feel great. So you've got beauty, service, and romance.

Of course, you could probably find a woman who charges less who is on a par with these girls, but they are probably in small communities and cannot leave for some reason; or they are just starting out. But these ladies are just charging what the market will bear for their talents.

Simply put, new girl starts out at $300 yet gradually raises her rates into the stratosphere as she moves up the ranks.  She's the same exact girl, marketing herself well and cashing in on her popularity.

Why the fuck would a girl want to see 8 guys a day at a lower rate, going through different guys like flipping burgers at a fast food joint, when she can see just 2~5 guys a day at a higher rate?

Don't you like getting paid the same or more while working less?

Also, I'm sure that there are plenty of guys who find that girl you were referring to more attractive and better than you thought of her.. and is the reason why she can command a higher rate. There's obviously a big enough market for each girl's unique qualities that sets her apart and caters to different preferences. This is within a reasonably acceptable range of course since there are no obese girls in the top 100.

Speaking of fast food, why am I craving for a big mac. But I refrain since I don't want to turn into that dude in the photo.

First of all the guy in the picture is a hobbyist, and the girl is a provider...he could be me

Well I am not that big,and i am a lot older, but definitely when I am seen with women, they are out of my league too

As to prices and ratings, I think one factor is that guys that see girls for 1000/hour, have to give them high scores. They would feel stupid if they paid that much and then rated them low

Depending on your area rates will differ. Here in the Midwest the "middle" girls are 200-400 per hour. The premium ladies are 400+. I don't know any providers in my area who charge more than 600/hr at the moment but as someone already said they market a different way and to a different audience.

There comes a point where the price is not equal to MORE service or BETTER service. Momma always says "you get what you pay for" and for lower priced providers that is true. I don't see what a 1000/hr provider does that I do not do however. Typically if an escort is "model quality" or a porn star (albeit a amateur one) they will ask for 500+ per hour. BUT I know very attractive model quality escorts who do NOT charge that much.
All in all it's a matter of what the lady wants to charge for her service. Making 600 per hour does mean she will see less gentlemen(typically) but it also means a lot of potential clients are closed to her. Likewise she has to market herself in different places than the average girl who asks for 250 per hour.

So word to the wise...find a comfortable bracket or allowance that you can spend without overstretching your pocketbook. You will find gems in your bracket and duds. Once again higher rate doesn't always mean higher quality service or more "options" on the menu.

because they can. I don't find a bit of fault with a woman that can get guys to give her a grand an hour to fuck them. I won't do it, but unless every woman in the business starts charging that type of rate I have no call to criticize anyone for success.

Look at Madonna for an example. She isn't that hot, she isn't a great singer, she isn't a great dancer, but she is as successful as an artist can be. I give her huge kudos for her success.

Rather than knock these HDH, why don't you other women figure out what allows these women to charge these type of rates and emulate them? but that of course would require a bit of introspection and a degree of honesty about oneself that few will be willing to do. It's easier to simply call them "nasty" and pretend you have the "moral high ground", Yeah, whatever get's you through the day.

if the rates from my ATF or the girls I like soar.... we must find........ a civvie girl

looking at your profile, it seems clear to me that the high-end providers (that I know) clearly offer more than you do.  There are some "nos", and "Don't knows" on your profile that would turn me away.  That's ENTIRELY your prerogative---it's a personal decision that I fully respect---but it also is a business decision that will likely restrain your earning capacity.  Again, it's YOUR body and YOUR decision, and I fully respect that.

When I'm hunting for a date, my preference is to know that the provider has almost all "yes" in the services area.  Whether I go for Greek, CIM or whatever depends on how the date runs, because I don't have a mental checklist that I'm going through.

But I'm VERY likely to pay a fair amount more than your $200/hour for that full list, the supriority of their reviews to yours, and the likelihood that I'm going to be the only dude she sees that day.  That's just the way I roll.

the post above this, I disagree with velvet.  As far as I can tell, your menu is complete other than indicating massage--yes.  The profile says "don't know" so if someone was really interested in a massage before or after, then he could ask politely in an email to you.

Simply put... a providers rate has absolutely no reflection of her services, attitude or how well you may or may not "click" together!

I suppose the more popular, or well reviewed ladies charge more becaue they have the accoloades and can perhaps choose to see fewer clients but the rate generaly has no bearing on the level of service!

I've been with girls who were $1K an hour and girls that charge $50 and hour.... I can trully tell you that the best bang for your buck is in the $200 - $300 range... The only reason to go beyond that is if you simply just have to have someone inparticular based on something they provide or the way they look.

The only reason I go over 400 is if it is a porn star or someone that I find simply stunning with great reviews! 250 - 300 is my standard fee but am willing to go higher for ladies who have stellar reviews or who I really connect with... once you get into the 400 - 500 area its not really worth it. What extra can you provide for that much difference in rate? In my mind it's not about the money but more about how to rationalize spending above the norm.

The easiest answer to this question though is... they are worth as much as you are willing to spend!!!! If you are not willing to, or able to provide their fee then move on.

Fog

Like wine it is all about perception. Just like wine the guy thinks it is better so it is. Truth is that it isn't any difference other then the standard variance but people think there because of price is so there is. See example below with wine.

This means people that are not price snobs can get the same enjoyment out of a $20 wine and a $200 an hour lady that a price snob needs to spend $90+ on the wine and the $1000+ an hour lady to get. I feel sorry for the price snobs, but we each have our own faults that rob us of much.

Why be a price snob? I think it has to do with proving your superior by flaunting your money. That to would lead to higher scores. If your spending an extra $700 to prove your higher class you are not going to hand out 7's and prove you are a fool.

For fun here is a photo of Hannah E from MetArt.com. I would love to share some overpriced wine with her.

Exists everywhere, besides escorts and wine.  Chevy vs Mercedes, Country Clubs, vs Muni golf courses, Private school vs public schools, Zegna suits vs Joseph Banks suits,  and the list goes on and on.  Amazing how marketing works!  All the more power to the ladies who can request high donation amounts. I prefer to just move on and  hobby at price that I feel comfortable with.

I was just using wine as a well documented example. I don't fault anyone for good marketing, if a lady can find someone to pay it she earned it.

For more fun here is someone else I would share over priced wine with, Lily C from MetArt.com

and the demand curve. When anything, or anybody, is a real bargain, they'll get a lot of takers. She'll have less time to prepare for the session -- did you ever stop and think how much time a provider really puts into each appointment? Or what happens when a gold rush occurs on a lady, attracting the attention of all sorts of people, including those who want to put the stomp to it all? The session itself could be the tip of the iceberg costwise.

so to be on top of 100- you have to have everything on the menu... Greek, swallow, and bareback intercourse.. that is gross... and you guys are paying all that money for STDs, prone and every guys cum they swallow-...  I rather be a safe provider and charge 400 per hour and not have my ass hole open up for guys that want to pay me for greek... the tought of me swallowing another person body fluids, makes me sick to my stomach, but hey to reach its own...

and also I have heard the guys says not all top 100 are beautiful, they just have to be skinny or athletic, with a butter face and with everything on the menu...

that is why they are top 100- they have to be nasty and provide all acronyms...

Looking at the top 10, not all swallow, several do not offer greek and there is no evidence that any of them offer bareback.  Bitch all you want about how some other hooker can do nasty things for extra money but the cold hard reality is that your rate is limited by market demand.  Offer what you want, but bashing others for how they run their business is low rent.  Then again, I'm sure that's why you used an alias.

I am not bashing them, I was referring to prior post..

and yes to charge all that money you have to have greek on your menu so do your homework and read their reviews.

I am not telling them how to run their business, I am just not going to put my health at risk.  I could see 2 guys per day for 400 per hour and still have my favorite client gives me an allowances every month.

they could provide whatever services they want...

that none of the women provide unprotected intercourse, anal or vaginal, but just about everything up to it. And I stand corrected if not all of them do all things. But it looks like a considerable percentage do. As far as a provider's preference, if one don't wish to do that, that perfectly fine. I can understand that. But a lot of guys like to see a girl lick up all the sperm he can shoot, and that's their preference also. Women are probably more at risk than guys are, and they charge in response to that.

$300 or less an hour just a few years earlier.  But some gals recognized an opportunity and seized it.  They kept testing the market and raised their rates, and as long as there were customers willing to pay the freight their strategy worked.

I thought I saw a bunch of protesters carrying posters calling these gals out here in Chicago as part of the 1%....but maybe it was just an illusion

Exactly!!! now that is an intelligent response.. and I am fine with that...

It may have been posted by Edrienne Cole, or possibly Reagan Moore, and you can do a search for it if you want (I'm too lazy).  But it was about how she figured out that, by raising her prices, she could kill several birds with one stone: make more $$, see fewer guys and have more free time, and have a higher quality client.

You're welcome! And I meant to say "one doesn't."

You sound bitter. By the sound of your post I would say you are overweight, probably older, several children,maybe living in some run down house and definitely jealous.All top 100 are nasty and  I guess all supermodels are hos too? Probably have stds, those skinny ones do.I mean how else would they get to the top?
Who has a butter face? Perhaps you? Lets go down the list of some of these monsters shall we? :
E cole?
B Adair?
B Beavius?
Shall i stop?
You are right. By god I never realized how ugly these women actually are! THANK YOU for enlightening us.
Everyone please go to the BOTTOM 100 on TER and there you will find all the beauties.
If you are charging 300, that is what you can get. If you are not busy as hell with that price point then you are probably charging too much.Simple economics.

Ok

number one I am not ugly and number 2 I am not overweight.. when I used the word nasty- meaning nasty as being nasty in the bedrooms, and do everything.. I get nasty too sometimes, but I will not do CIM, I will Not do Greek, I will not swallow, and I will not do RIMMING.. so it is my choice and I am allowed to do that... the same way they are allowed to provide all acronyms.. the more nasty you are in the bedrooms the more guys are setting up appointments with you.

ok- dont get offended by the word nasty...

so and I am not bitter at all.. and if you read my post and says some NOT all- coming from guys said some of them are skinny with butter face.. beauty is in the eye of the beholder

so calm down.. I am allowed to give my opinion and the same way you are allow to give your opinion..

Also with all my limitations and things I will NOT do... and that is why I do not charge 700 or more, because I know somes things I will not do..

so Let's say I charge 700 per hour and you guys come see me and read my reviews that said _ No CIM, NO Greek, No DFK, No Rimming and I do not swallow... let's be honest how many guys would come to see me in that price range with all my limitations?  zero  .... exactly my point... so I know I have limitations and that is why I charge accordingly for my services...

got my point...

I am not putting them down by using the word nasty-- ok Nasty in the bedroom that is my clarification..

you are the one who used the term 'butter face' for all top 100 providers. And just because a dealer sells pot instead of coke doesn't make him less of a dealer. Get off your high horse. btw, your alias post just makes it painfully obvious what you actually do look like, and who you are.