Point 1.  Your writing like you're sending a text gives away your real fake name.

Point 2.  You have it backwards.  It's not that regular girls can't be on the list.  The ones that have those consistent high scores have marketed themselves to a different audience that's willing to pay higher rates.  It's easier to please 5 guys per month than 5 guys a day.  If you aren't OK paying high rates, don't.  Some1 will c u.

IMO, thinking 'statically' should not apply. It's an dynamic, constantly moving thing.

Simply put, new girl starts out at $300 yet gradually raises her rates into the stratosphere as she moves up the ranks.  She's the same exact girl, marketing herself well and cashing in on her popularity.

Why the fuck would a girl want to see 8 guys a day at a lower rate, going through different guys like flipping burgers at a fast food joint, when she can see just 2~5 guys a day at a higher rate?

Don't you like getting paid the same or more while working less?

Also, I'm sure that there are plenty of guys who find that girl you were referring to more attractive and better than you thought of her.. and is the reason why she can command a higher rate. There's obviously a big enough market for each girl's unique qualities that sets her apart and caters to different preferences. This is within a reasonably acceptable range of course since there are no obese girls in the top 100.

Speaking of fast food, why am I craving for a big mac. But I refrain since I don't want to turn into that dude in the photo.

Well I am not that big,and i am a lot older, but definitely when I am seen with women, they are out of my league too

As to prices and ratings, I think one factor is that guys that see girls for 1000/hour, have to give them high scores. They would feel stupid if they paid that much and then rated them low

Depending on your area rates will differ. Here in the Midwest the "middle" girls are 200-400 per hour. The premium ladies are 400+. I don't know any providers in my area who charge more than 600/hr at the moment but as someone already said they market a different way and to a different audience.

There comes a point where the price is not equal to MORE service or BETTER service. Momma always says "you get what you pay for" and for lower priced providers that is true. I don't see what a 1000/hr provider does that I do not do however. Typically if an escort is "model quality" or a porn star (albeit a amateur one) they will ask for 500+ per hour. BUT I know very attractive model quality escorts who do NOT charge that much.
All in all it's a matter of what the lady wants to charge for her service. Making 600 per hour does mean she will see less gentlemen(typically) but it also means a lot of potential clients are closed to her. Likewise she has to market herself in different places than the average girl who asks for 250 per hour.

So word to the wise...find a comfortable bracket or allowance that you can spend without overstretching your pocketbook. You will find gems in your bracket and duds. Once again higher rate doesn't always mean higher quality service or more "options" on the menu.

if the rates from my ATF or the girls I like soar.... we must find........ a civvie girl

Like wine it is all about perception. Just like wine the guy thinks it is better so it is. Truth is that it isn't any difference other then the standard variance but people think there because of price is so there is. See example below with wine.

This means people that are not price snobs can get the same enjoyment out of a $20 wine and a $200 an hour lady that a price snob needs to spend $90+ on the wine and the $1000+ an hour lady to get. I feel sorry for the price snobs, but we each have our own faults that rob us of much.

Why be a price snob? I think it has to do with proving your superior by flaunting your money. That to would lead to higher scores. If your spending an extra $700 to prove your higher class you are not going to hand out 7's and prove you are a fool.

For fun here is a photo of Hannah E from MetArt.com. I would love to share some overpriced wine with her.

and the demand curve. When anything, or anybody, is a real bargain, they'll get a lot of takers. She'll have less time to prepare for the session -- did you ever stop and think how much time a provider really puts into each appointment? Or what happens when a gold rush occurs on a lady, attracting the attention of all sorts of people, including those who want to put the stomp to it all? The session itself could be the tip of the iceberg costwise.

Simply put... a providers rate has absolutely no reflection of her services, attitude or how well you may or may not "click" together!

I suppose the more popular, or well reviewed ladies charge more becaue they have the accoloades and can perhaps choose to see fewer clients but the rate generaly has no bearing on the level of service!

I've been with girls who were $1K an hour and girls that charge $50 and hour.... I can trully tell you that the best bang for your buck is in the $200 - $300 range... The only reason to go beyond that is if you simply just have to have someone inparticular based on something they provide or the way they look.

The only reason I go over 400 is if it is a porn star or someone that I find simply stunning with great reviews! 250 - 300 is my standard fee but am willing to go higher for ladies who have stellar reviews or who I really connect with... once you get into the 400 - 500 area its not really worth it. What extra can you provide for that much difference in rate? In my mind it's not about the money but more about how to rationalize spending above the norm.

The easiest answer to this question though is... they are worth as much as you are willing to spend!!!! If you are not willing to, or able to provide their fee then move on.

Fog