TGIF, and you know what that means. Yes, it's time for Provider Friday. That's when the HOBBYIST gets to tell us who your favorite Provider is for the Week. It can be an old favorite, a new flame, someone you'd like to see, or just someone you think seems cool! She can be a Local Lady or Touring Lady that comes to this area.  
 
Please post a name in the subject line.  
** Plus Include a Link to her Reviews and/or Web Site. *

Probably doesn't even live in SD.  He posts this in several other cities too.

To those who responded to LK's post - Why such disdain?  If he is doing something you dont like then ignore it.  I think there is a function on the site where you can ignore his posts.

he DA can't do dick with circumstantial evidence genius: there requires a burden of proof.  
As in: agreeing to services for money, promoting said services for money or anything in-between.

I'm not interested in LC post, but this reply is for AEJ...  You write as if you know something about the law.  Without giving anything away, what degree or experience do you have that would convince anyone to listen to your BS?  If you haven't noticed, there are 1.1 MILLION reviews and 5K new reviews.  Maybe the DAs across the Country better work a lot of overtime.

Isn't the definition of insanity doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result? Mr Cranston posts this shill shit every Friday, and every Friday nobody responds. Plus I don't think the point of TER's shill Friday was for some clown to start a thread every week with "Who is your shill for the week?" I'm pretty sure it was meant for someone to actually start a thread with a shill. Has LC ever posted a shill??

geesh - Lots of pent up animosity.  Im not sure what to say other than the fact that LK probably doesnt give a crap about a different result as his posts have certainly touch a nerve with you. He has a different result with me every week - but then again I remain open minded and not influenced by the herd.  Be safe out there!

The DA can most certainly convict on circumstantial evidence alone. there is a jury instruction that says that circumstantial evidence bears the same weight as direct.

I don't really find this forum the place for sharing who we have "done" or who we are about to "do".  The former should be confined to the reviews section.  The latter, if it has any place at all, should probably go under ISO or possibly in the form of "I'm looking for a hot blond with tats and a great sense of humor who is fun to be around, any suggestions, etc".  I like the pics LC posts - very hot if somewhat unattainable.  But the invitation to share just seems out of place.  On the other hand, I think if everyone ignores him (or maybe her?), then the posts will wither on the vine of apathy, making way for more substantive commentary and discussion.

This guy has no life.  I feel sorry for him.  TER is the only excitement he has posting on all the boards & has the time to do, so...sad.

Curiously the mysterious LC also posts on the San Francisco board.
He seems to have received way more attention than was warranted.

Ask Aaron Hernandez about being convicted for life on Circ Ev.  QUACK QUACK!!

I don't get it.  Why the objections?  Personally I enjoy his visuals and I look for his post as soon as I sign on.