Politics and Religion

The planes were all that they had to work with
charlie445 3 Reviews 1241 reads
posted

If they had access to more formidable weapons they would have used them. Lets be clear grasshopper, suicide attacks are a the last resort of a fanatical resistance to US capitalism. Remember that these same fanatical tactics were successful in removing the Russians from Afganistan, Grasshopper.

In the vamping up by the GOP of anti-Islamic hatred, Christian lunatic paster Terry Jones (complete with handlebar mustache!) plans to burn the Quran on 9/11.

He seemed rather miffed that Cooper suggested that this could get a few more US soldiers killed.

But I gotta say, I'm not entirely opposed to what this lunatic is doing.

There seems to be a double standard in this country. Religious lunatics are free to practice their delusional beliefs, and affect public policy for the worse, and yet no one is allowed to criticize religious lunatics, or their idiotic and genocidial beliefs.

In that regards, I'm quite glad this nutcase is going to be burning a Quran. And with a little luck, some nutty Muslim will walk into his church on Sunday with party favors strapped to his chest.

Now all we gotta do is burn a few Bibles and Talmuds too. The sweet smell of progress, eh?

But why is it that the first thing a fascist does is burn books? Do these hicks really hate reading that much? Can't they recycle some Qurans and use them to print out Beef Jerky recipes?

Priapus532542 reads

( though some feeble minded on this board won't take it that way ) incitement to violence, from both sides, even "tongue in cheek", is unacceptable.

As for " Pastor" Jones, he's a crazed & stupid bigot whose "stunt" could endanger many lives. If he had a brain ( unlikely ) he should call off this moronic event.

...is that usually there's a religious nutcase left standing. I dearly hope that all the religious lunatics on this planet kill each other off. Hopefully, with their bare hands so we can use them for fertilizer.

willywonka7:07:25 "But I gotta say, I'm not entirely opposed to what this lunatic is doing."
"In that regards, I'm quite glad this nutcase is going to be burning a Quran. And with a little luck, some nutty Muslim will walk into his church on Sunday with party favors strapped to his chest."

Willy I know you are equal opportunity at stirring up the  pot, but would you really like the couple dozen innocent dimwits parishioners to sufffer, because of what their delusional pastor does? Lets not forget the uprising over some cartoons in Denmark, and the fact we have troops surrounded by Muslims.I'm not sure if Rev Terry  is a fascist anymore than Pripus or Marilyn Manson.I believe he is starving for attention,similar to Marilyn Manson when he was unknown. By the way Marilyn Manson ripped up many Bibles in public to draw attention to himself, and he doesn't need a bodyguard.I seriously doubt the book burning will go on as planned.Here's a interesting read on burned and banned books in the past.

http://www.freedomtoread.ca/links_and_resources/bannings_and_burnings.asp



GaGambler1102 reads

I don't believe in pouring more gasoline on an already burning "holy war", but even a moron like WW should recognize the hypocrisy of what he says. Yeah right, hypocritical idiots like Willy never recognize their own hypocrisy, even when it is in print and plain as day.

Personally I wish we could lock all the religious nut jobs, both Christian and Muslim, in a huge room and let them fight it out to the death of them all, but of course that's just wishful thinking.

Say the words "there is no god" one thousand times and you're a lunatic. LMAO

GaGambler1767 reads

I guess the religious pukes will consider you a lunatic if you say it even once.

This is for you Comrade Charlie


THERE IS NO GOD!!! roflmfao

lets see, there is no god. thats 1.

I'm not saying this pastor is a lunatic because he wants to burn the Quran. He's a lunatic regardless of that. If some atheists burned the Bible in the US, that would just be amusing. If some Muslims in Saudi-fuck-istan burned the bible, then they would be lunatics. See, no hypocrisy here. :)

Why wouldn't an atheist be a lunatic for burning "holy books". The pastor is not a lunatic actually. He is making some sort of statement to further his agenda. We don't know what his agenda is, do we? has he said what his agenda is? All we know is that his congregation is anti islam. I would say that this man is a coward. He is willing to bait a bear but apparently he is not willing to wrestle one up close and personal.
I think he should go to Somalia  to burn  his Quran.  


...are few. In this pastor's case, he's basically just saying "my delusional beliefs are better than your delusional beliefs." That makes him a lunatic. An atheist burning a holy book would do so as a stand against irrationality.

It goes without saying that this guy is a coward. Fascists are always cowards.

Just another generalization that you make that is so wrong.

Did I say that no one else in America wasn't anti-Islamic other than the GOP?

PW, there's only one political party who's running on Islamophobia this election year. Tell me Pitch, which party is that?

Dems are terrorist ass kissers. That's why they haven't put Dubya on trial for War Crimes yet.

I don't think either the Dems or the Republicans are running on "Islamophobia."  The Republicans are running on cost containment and common sense.  And the Dems are running on "This is all Bush's fault."

"I don't think either the Dems or the Republicans are running on "Islamophobia."

Wow. Really, PW? I'm guessing the "Ground Zero" Mosque isn't ringing any bells? Or as Faux News likes to call it, "our top story".

with the Ground Zero Mosque, you think you can claim that the entire Party is running on anti-Muslim feelings???

First of all, the opposition to the Mosque really has little to do with anti-Mulsim outrage and more to do with respect for the families and memories of thousands of dead Americans.

And, secondly, there are many, many Dems who are also against the building of that co-called cultural center.

Sounds like you watch Fox News a lot more than I do . . . .

I'm saying that the GOP is CREATING the anti-Muslim sentiment, and running on it in this year's election. It's the oldest trick in the GOP playbook. How you don't see this is beyond me.

to generalize and say that all the GOP is pulling that shit is nonsense.

Of course, what else would I expect to hear from you . . . . . .

no. 63410 reads

"Vamping up" gives your post a completely different emphasis.

And kill thousands in one day. yet yer bitching about this?

If they had access to more formidable weapons they would have used them. Lets be clear grasshopper, suicide attacks are a the last resort of a fanatical resistance to US capitalism. Remember that these same fanatical tactics were successful in removing the Russians from Afganistan, Grasshopper.

"""If they had access to more formidable weapons they would have used them"""""""

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cwqh4wQPoQk

Be sure to listen closely. Then ask yourself, in light of how Bush was criticized vis a vie the "August PDB", how he would have been criticized had Saddam's WMD programs had not been busted up.

BTW, there still is no God.

a 9/11 type could happen here again. Its the new world order. The enemies of US capitalism will stop at nothing to bring about its demise. On the other hand, the capitalist class will defend its self till the the US working and middle classes are no better off than slaves.

is that Saddam's WMDs were broken up back during the Clinton administration.

As the old Paul Mooney joke goes, "why was Bush so sure that Saddam had WMDs? Because his daddy had the receipt."

I asked you to listen carefully Willy. Try again but this time pay specal attention to Bill and Hill in 2002. You will then see the following:

Posted By: willywonka4u
is that Saddam's WMDs were broken up back during the Clinton administration. ."
just ain't true.
[As the old Paul Mooney joke goes, "why was Bush so sure that Saddam had WMDs? Because his daddy had the receipt."
Exactly. Therefore....?

Remember the UN weapon inspectors? They estimated that they got something like 85% of Saddam's weapons. The rest was used up in the Gulf War, or had expired.

and John Edwards and John Kerry, and Joe BiteMe...the list goes on....or you can just rewatch the video.

See, that's the thing about certitude. It's one thing for us wankers pullin our puds on TER to say Saddam had no WMD, it's quite another to be certain of that when you are responsible for 300 millions Americans safety.

In light of the circumstances of 9/11 and the degree of FUD floating about Iraq. I don't blame GWB one iota.

As to the backstabbing traitors who sent our guys to war, then ran for political cover, I say Fuck Em'








It wasn't exactly a secret. Hell, even I knew it, and I wasn't in the gov't at the time.

""Saddam's WMDs were broken up back during the Clinton administration.

As the old Paul Mooney joke goes, "why was Bush so sure that Saddam had WMDs? Because his daddy had the receipt."""

these are 2 clearly contradictory statements so...clear it up for me...

Chowder, i can't hear you..

Remember that these same fanatical tactics were successful in removing the Russians from Afganistan, Grasshopper."""

But not without significant support by one Ronald Reagan. See "Stinger missile"

Lets hope that the fanatics don't make friends with the enemies of capitalism. Oh wait, those would be commies wouldn't they?

however, we dont need to worry about the Muzzies snuggling up to the Commies. The Muzzies hate those godless heathens too.

We expect people to act with restraint even when exposed to material they find offensive.

For examples, just look at the absolutely rampant and flagrant affronts to Christianity in this country.

A couple of recent examples are "Piss Christ" as an art exhibit, with Jesus on the cross upside down in urine; and Ofili's "The Holy Virgin Mary." In fairness, I believe this latter painting to be seriously misunderstood by religious folks; but nevertheless both were incredibly offensive.

Moreover, Christianity is used as a punching bag in this country by everything from stand=up comedians to Saturday Night Live.

YET -- and here is my point -- NOBODY says to the various artists, comedians, etc. "Don't you dare offend those Christians!  If you do, they will likely kill a whole bunch of people to vent their rage."

You think Meet the Fokkers didn't poke fun at Jews?

No. The Christians, Jews and others in this country and abroad are expected to behave in a civil fashion, even if offended, and not run around killing people.

Here is what I find hilarious. Follow this carefully because it isn't obvious.

"We are all equals." Okay. That means my expectations of a Muslim are the same as my expectations of a Jew or a Christian or an Atheist.

"Don't burn that Koran, or enraged Muslims will kill lots of Americans."

See the contradiction?

We expect Christians, Jews, Atheists and others to take offenses in stride and still act like civil humans.

But we expect Muslims to go off the deep-end when they are offended and start killing people who pose them no risk.

And this expectation is labeled as "Respect."

It is NOT respect. It is the worst of low expectations. It is NOT seeing Muslims as EQUAL, but rather as inferior beings incapable of exercising even basic impulse control.

This is not about quid pro quo or justification.

It is about treating our fellow man as an equal.

I'm not allowed to kill a long-haired, louse-infested, dope-smoking protestor who burns my flag and offends me and the memory of my forefathers and our sacrifices. I am supposed to stand silently.

Fine.

Burn the Koran.

Not because it should be burned; because basic respect says it ought not. Rather, burn it so the Muslims of the world have an opportunity to demonstrate their equality in terms of civil society.

Burn it so we can show that we regard Muslims as our EQUALS. We regard them as human beings capable of exercising the same impulse control we expect of everyone else.

Granted, affront should not be given gratuitously in polite society.

But affronts to the dominant religion of this country are so commonplace as to nearly be cultural institutions in their own right. Church Lady anyone?

If you offend me, and I go running around killing people; it is *I* who am responsible for my actions, NOT YOU.

Well, if this dumbass burns the Koran and Muslims go running around killing people, it is THEY who are responsible for their actions, NOT HIM.

The most sensible post here. Thank you.

my only problem with it is that I don't see Muslims, Christians, or Jews as equals. And while I'm sure Christians are offended by depictions of their tortured hero in a vat of piss, no one gives a rat's ass about what atheists find offensive.

It's not exactly an equal exchange. While Creationism is pushed in public schools with my tax dollars, you don't see a bunch of atheists pushing to require teaching kids evolution in Sunday school.

-- Modified on 9/8/2010 1:41:40 PM

there is no god, I don't care what you think!

JLWest1490 reads

Posted By: charlie445
there is no god, I don't care what you think!
I can chose to think there is a GOD. And I can still burn the damn book.

You can do both of those things and you dont know why you are doing them.

Capitalist imperialist Christians have been treating Islamic peoples to the very best of colonial subjugation for quite a while now. The tables are starting to turn and imperialism is a lot more expensive
than it used to be. Look at a map of the world John and tell me what you see in terms of religious demographics. Then look at geographical area in terms of religious demographics. After that look at population density. Tell me what you see John. There is no god!

... and don't for one moment think I'm defending the Quran. I'm not. On the whole, I consider it a profane and racist document. But it IS a book of extreme historical importance, and that gives it value and worth, despite its heinous messages about Jews and other Infidels. I once said the same thing about Mein Kampf. As odious as that manifesto is, it is a book, and Farenheit 451 is supposed to be a work of fiction, not fact.

When we allow this type of activity, we in the United States lose the last few meters of High Moral Ground we still hold. Just because other countries practice this vile form of censorship doesn't mean America should sanction it.

But this is the price we pay for allowing the Haters to gain a foothold in our society.

Burning a book isnt censorship. Banning the book itself...or banning the burning of one, is.

Posted By: DoctorGonzo
... and don't for one moment think I'm defending the Quran. I'm not. On the whole, I consider it a profane and racist document. But it IS a book of extreme historical importance, and that gives it value and worth, despite its heinous messages about Jews and other Infidels. I once said the same thing about Mein Kampf. As odious as that manifesto is, it is a book, and Farenheit 451 is supposed to be a work of fiction, not fact.

When we allow this type of activity, we in the United States lose the last few meters of High Moral Ground we still hold. Just because other countries practice this vile form of censorship doesn't mean America should sanction it.

But this is the price we pay for allowing the Haters to gain a foothold in our society.

I know what the point is....  that radical Islam is someone to kow to, despite our own laws and freedoms. However, if Muslims were burning Bibles on every corner, nobody would give a damn.
FUCK MUSLIMS. I tire of the tolerance for people who shown none themselves. Burn the bitch.

JLWest1001 reads

This isn't even a tough one to figure out. If the Rev Terry Jones wants to burn the Quran, let him. If you want to burn Bibles go ahead, I got no problems with Mein Kampf, Farenheit 451 or Pride and Prejudice going up in flames for that matter. Damn I really like Pride and Prejudice, great book.

We allow this type of activity in United States because it's there right to protest, burn books, march, have rallies. When we allow this type of activity in United States we don't lose a fraction of an inch of high ground. When we stop the right of an citizen  or group of citizens to burn books we lose freedom.
The vile form of censorship you are so afraid of says: I can write an explicit porn novel and you can buy one and burn it, and the next guy can buy one and read it.

This is not the price of allowing haters in our society. We have always had haters in our society. Hell they use to burn people as witches in New England. (No I do approve of burning anyone). I hate to inform you that I can buy 1000 Quran and have them burned or pay someone to burn them for me.

I received a personal invitation from President Lyndon Baines Johnson (dumb ass) to fight in a little war to save America Rights and Freedoms we all hold dear. I went, served my time, came home and was spit on at the airport in San Francisco, refused service at a coffee shop, cussed on the streets of my home town. The fucking hippie didn't have the right to spit on me but I walked away, it was there coffee shop, I left and it wasn't the first time I was cussed out on the street of my home town. After all I did drive my car thru the front window of the grocery store at 12:31 at night.

Point is everyone had the right except the hippie.  I fought for it and I don't want anyone to take it away.

Added coments to this post:
The only way you keep freedom is to exercise it regulary, fight for often and die for it if need be. If a pastor can say "God Damn America" with a presidential canadate in the congression, then burn the fucking books.

GaGambler1699 reads

My first thought was that the Rev Terry Jones was a self aggrandizing, publicity seeking, piece of shit, attention whore that was only doing this to claim his "fifteen minutes of fame" without regard for the innocent lives that could be lost in the expected backlash from Muslim extremists.

I still feel that way, BUT I agree that we have fought and died for over two hundred years for his (and our) right to do exactly that.This is a free country and the loss of life is on the heads of those that commit those heinous crimes and rightly or wrongly cannot be laid at the feet of the self righteous Rev.

Personally, I still feel the good Reverend is nothing but a self aggrandizing, publicity whore who is going to accomlish nothing but pouring fuel on an already raging fire, and lend credibilty to our enemies who claim this is a holy war against a "Chritian country" but I still respect his right to burn a Quoran or a thousand of them, just like I reluctantly support the right of organizations like the KKK or moveon.org to exist no matter how distasteful their message is to me personally.

The only people I can think of whose 1st Ammendment rights I don't support are TrannyBoy and Willy, If I had the power to muzzle either one of them, I would do it in a heartbeat. rofl

Register Now!