Politics and Religion
The Harry's sure are willing to change subjects to somebody they hate more.
I'll remember this whenever people say that liberals are bitter people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sawN7uJ8s8s
=====================
If you don't know a person too well...you try to know him through his friends.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovO8hFt8-c8
She is a partisan asshole that will do and say anything to further her cause. she is a real asshole.
Dang, This guy really nails Clinton too. Clinton is a pathalogical liar.
I guess I better tie this into the topic. Barry Obama is a dirty rotten Democrat just like Albright and the Clinton crime family and the Utube videos point that out. Obama is dirty dirty dirty.
-- Modified on 7/10/2008 7:53:34 AM
And the tumor grows even more!!!
I'm expecting that there's a reason why a campaign costing millions of dollars is worth it at the end. I also expect that Chicago politicians are either corrupt to the core, or are pragmatists who are touched by corruption. I put Obama in the second category, with the hope that everything but his liberal tendencies come out in the wash.
The Bush family has much the same history of having the whole family rewarded for Dad's good fortune, that is early and often. Like Neil. Like Jeb, and hell, Dubya owes his whole career and presidency to it. Now that was all that was uncovered and known before during and after Dubya's 2000 campaign. Still, the fiscally responsible, meritorious God-fearing and upright Republicans with their true moral compass had no problem with any of it.
We're not talking about Paul Wellstone here. Wellstone, like Kucinich, would have never become president. Why? Well the answer is apparent. They are both too ethical to award anybody else for the honor. Perhaps the better term might be too unrealistic. Becoming president is full of compromises. You hope his central three moral convictions aren't compromised, and that he keeps quiet about them till it's time to bring them out, because as soon as he says them aloud, everybody knows what you'll give the most for, and so how to get what they want from you.
If you noticed, anti-lobbyist McCain has had a lobbyist problem, like they were actually running his campaign.
Therefore, I presume you aren't going to vote for either side, and you'll ridicule both.
-- Modified on 7/10/2008 10:54:19 AM
The sonofabitch was a flaming commie. One of his problems was that although he claimed to relate to the peasants, the bastard never did a damn'd thing except sit in an ivory tower insulated from reality and then pretended to know all the answers about running the lives of all the peasants. He was a big piece of shit just like Hussein.
oh shit, i thought you meant Gladstone, the 19th century British PM who used to stroll around at night trying to convince the ladies of the night to reform of their wicked ways.
that's the ice cream chain...or is that Coldstone?
Maybe Kidneystone
Those are two words I'd never thought I'd see in the same paragraph. That's like saying Lenin and Stalin were ethical. Yes they were true believers, like DK, but so what. To call Kucininch ethical is nuts.
I'll remember this whenever people say that liberals are bitter people.
You mean like bringing up McCain and lobbyists on a post about a video? That kind of changing the subject?
. . . in a two man election. After a video, I had to explain why Obama didn't look much worse.
And you've changed subjects again to somebody else I presume you hate.
Moreover, if you then had to explain why Kucinich is unethical, as you really should have instead of making that kind of drive-by, then the thread is totally of subject.
Well why didn't you explain by Obama didn't look much worse, maybe by refuting the points in the video instead of going on about Wellstone and Kucinich. WTF do they have to do with the video? Or Obama or McCain.
It's always fun to watch the lefties accuse the other guy of exactly what they are doing. And they don't like it when they're called on it.
You didn't catch that? That's right, I was agreeing with the facts, but still supporting Obama. Why? Because it's a two man race, and compared with his opponent, he's still much better and looking better every day. I'm saying that even if they are true, that doesn't shake my support for him.
You couldn't figure it out, but I was comparing Obama to Kucinich and Wellstone, where I would expect something else. But because of that "something else," they never will (or would have) progressed beyond square 1 for the Presidency.
Now, I meant for that comparison to be disposed of after it was used, but you growled at the name Kucinich wasting bandwith before you got back on topic-- with this one.
Very astute of you to realize Wellstone can't win, what being dead and everything. I'd put my money on Dead Paul being elected over a Live Dennis.
But if that's the only place you can go, I know I've made my point.
Did not DD a few years back suggest that conservative Xtians should try to look kindly upon Islamic fundamentalists because both groups are skeptical about social changes leading to permissiveness?
I think he better go back to beating up the strawman PC professors. At least that's amusing.
This new conspiracy brought to you by The Holeydiver Truth Foundation and Anal Intercourse Advocacy Team America Agglomeration. We are on YouTube, but I'd have to kill you if I linked you there.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
