Politics and Religion

Thanks for the reminder! ;)
mattradd 40 Reviews 23 reads
posted
2 / 40

You must have been watching something other than what I saw, if you saw it at all. Miller just did what he's done since childhood, which always left him playing in the sandbox all by himself! ;)

-- Modified on 1/7/2018 12:49:08 PM

JackDunphy 16 reads
posted
3 / 40

I loved that he threw CNN's fake news back in Tapper's face time after time, specifically citing all there bogus and horrific reporting recently. Watching Tapper squirm was priceless as he had no answers.

 
Really embarrassing to watch a guy like Tapper, who once had a good rep, use the Wolff book as any type of legit source. especially with numerous LIBERALS now on record saying Wolff is a gutter snipe, liar and plays loose with the facts.

 
So why in the world would "the most trusted name in news," cough cough cough, mention ANYTHING he says as fact? Just when you think CNN couldn't go any lower, they always seem to manage to surprise to the downside.

NYminute 26 reads
posted
4 / 40

Every time his lips moved, I could tell he was lying.  He is no more than a mindless sycophant.  Miller would eat Trump's doo doo, and swear it was chocolate pudding!  The world would know better, but Miller would come back for seconds!

mattradd 40 Reviews 11 reads
posted
5 / 40

I hope Jack didn't try saying that with a straight face! Oh well, we'll never know will we? ;)

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 15 reads
posted
6 / 40

...trying to get over all the wedgies he got in school as well as all the times his lunch money was stolen.  He's still sucking up to the bullies (like Trump) in the hopes that they won't kick his ass.

DJMagicMan 14 reads
posted
7 / 40

He let Miller get under his skin. Tapper was acting partisan and was condescending. Good reporters shelve their personal animus.

macdaddy1944 51 Reviews 26 reads
posted
8 / 40

The very definition of suckhole..

mrhuck 15 Reviews 11 reads
posted
9 / 40

...it doesn't matter what Stephen Miller is arguing he is totally incapable of dialog, his only defense of his position is to talk over whoever is on the other side of the conversation as a method of diversion, only fools believe that this kind of behavior wins the argument. Jake  Tapper exercised an extraordinary level of patience with Miller if I were in Tappers position I would have ended the interview far sooner.

BuffetBoy 3 Reviews 18 reads
posted
10 / 40

I do view Tapper as a journalist and not an entertainer, per se. He was impatient and snarky and he made himself part of the story. He shouldn't be mocking his guest, no matter what he feels personally about him or her. Tapper is not a partisan but I would be willing to bet he wasn't pleased with his performance. He is very good and just had an off interview, in my opinion.

bigguy30 24 reads
posted
11 / 40

So clearly Trump and his supporters are not paying attention to their own bs network. Lol

NYminute 19 reads
posted
12 / 40

Miller is nothing more than a lap dog.  Simply pitiful!  Another example of Trump-ites claiming to be the sane, adults in the room, and behaving like unpolished, rude, maniacs to make their point--pure example of cognitive dissonance!

NYminute 14 reads
posted
13 / 40

did an excellent job--if you consider politicking to be the next grand wizard of the KKK something worthwhile.  Could tell he had a screw loose, but never realized his mental deficiency went way back to his days in middle school and left a trail right through Duke University.

 
What a sick puppy!!

DJMagicMan 25 reads
posted
14 / 40

I was just making the point he was coming across as partisan in this particular interview. We both agree that disrespecting his guest is unprofessional and I was quite surprised he did so.  
It is nice to see a Democrat like yourself be non-partisan about this subject. The board seems to be completely polarized one way or the other.

NYminute 9 reads
posted
15 / 40

if he truly was intelligent, he would not be wasting his time tweeting such foolishness.  What intelligent person, allows something he professes to be so wrong, to dominate his every waking thought/moment?

 
Makes me think of Mohammed Ali's "rope a dope."  In time, Trump will be completely "punched out."  What do you think comes after that?

mattradd 40 Reviews 18 reads
posted
16 / 40

no matter what side of the aisle they're on. If you noticed the following interview with Adam Schiff, he quartered him about his speculating why the JD was re-opening investigations into Hillary. He asked on what basis he arrived at his opinion, and it became clear that there was not much of substance, he was able to, or willing to reveal, upon which his opinion rested on.

mattradd 40 Reviews 16 reads
posted
17 / 40

to argue that you are in full control of your faculties! ;)

Sorry Laffy, but I'm going to have to beat you to it. "I choose the best people for my administration!" ;)

BuffetBoy 3 Reviews 16 reads
posted
18 / 40

I want a hard, tough, interview regardless of the guest's political identification. But when it becomes personal, and the comments become snarky, he loses his professionalism to a degree. I first read about the interview on the Hill so please find the column attached.
The statements I had problems with were these Mattradd:
1) “I get it. There’s one viewer that you care about right now and you're being obsequious and you’re being a factotum in order to please him, OK,” Tapper said on "State of the Union," appearing to reference the president.
2) "After returning from a commercial break, Tapper appeared to chide Miller, telling viewers, “welcome back to 'State of the Union' and to planet Earth.”

Jake Tapper should be above comments like these. Ask the tough questions, sure, pounce when you see weakness or lies, of course, but act like a true professional always. Mocking or goading Mr. Miller should not be on the menu of an experienced, well respected journalist as Tapper, and just serves as fodder for Trump's out of touch base to yell "fake news" from the rafters.
I am not condemning Mr. Tapper, as I am a big fan, but I think he may have wanted parts of this interview back, if he could do it all over again. Thank you for your response and hearing me out.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/367803-tapper-cuts-off-heated-interview-with-miller

BuffetBoy 3 Reviews 15 reads
posted
19 / 40

I consider myself a "Progressive" and not a Democrat. The DNC has let me down on many occasions, but my liberalism never does.  
We are in total agreement about the polarization of the board and I make an effort to see the other side of the aisle's view, as I am not in lock step with everything my party does and I will speak up when I am in disagreement.  
I would hope we could all get there one day, but sometimes I do get caught up in the hyper partisanship world we live in too.
Enjoy your evening.

Hpygolky 234 Reviews 31 reads
posted
20 / 40

Take a bow...Only a true trump supporter would have loved this. What I saw was that Miller wasn't going to interact with Tapper. Miller was avoiding answering the questions in detail, just spouting off how great trump is and just talking over Tapper. Miller was like a robot, echoing how great trump is as if trump was doing the interview. Trying to please the man at the WH, sitting on his sofa, chowing down on his Cheetos.  
I lost track watching this heartless dead soul with the look of a man who has been embalmed with trump. His dead pan eyes had one mission, to discredit CNN and the book. No common dialect, he was going to hijack this interview...I knew where this interview was going.Tapper should have pulled the plug sooner, he gave him way too much time. Now, all Miller's done is regulate him to only fox, he's become the another version of Kellyanne Conway...a persona non grata by the mainstream media

Jinx_The_Cat 33 Reviews 18 reads
posted
21 / 40

Miller did not state one single fact or specific reference to Wolfes book that he claimed was false.  All he did was regurgitate his sycophantic Trump dogma and came off looking completely insane - again!

JackDunphy 23 reads
posted
22 / 40

The lame stream media shouldn't be determining anyone as a "persona non grata" in politics as that is NOT there job. It is there job to REPORT the news, and not choose sides and BECOME the news, like Tapper did.

 
Do I really have to tell you this?

mattradd 40 Reviews 11 reads
posted
24 / 40

He doesn't understand the concept of an interview! ;)

And, he twists thing around to make it appear what is said supports his point! ;)

NYminute 8 reads
posted
25 / 40

Aren't you describing exactly what one would expect from a troll?  No true intent on addressing the subject at hand--only absurd, irrelevant, inflammatory falsehoods to see how many will fall for the bait!

 
Must confess, at first I too fell for the bait, until after a while it became abundantly clear.

mattradd 40 Reviews 7 reads
posted
26 / 40

I forgot that was one of my New Year's Resolutions for 2017. It's clear I'm going to have to carry it over to 2018! ;)

DJMagicMan 30 reads
posted
27 / 40

Tapper lost his cool. That is ok. He is human. But some on this thread have lost their ability to analyze the fourth estates job. You are 100% correct. It is not the role of the media to determine winners or losers. It is their job to give all the pertinent info to the viewer and let him or her decide.

mattradd 40 Reviews 24 reads
posted
28 / 40

It was clear to anyone, who was not a political hack, that Miller had no intention to be interviewed, but to use the opportunity to be on TV for his, and his master's own political purpose.

DJMagicMan 22 reads
posted
29 / 40

Isn't the object of an interview, with a reporter, is to get the guest's opinion and not the other way around?

mattradd 40 Reviews 19 reads
posted
30 / 40

You'll find the answer! ;)

JakeFromStateFarm 17 reads
posted
31 / 40

But I agree with you, and I'd rather have seen Tapper let Miller vapor on and then point out: "You realize you haven't remotely answered my question? I'll let you try again, but if you keep filibustering I'm going to have to end this interview."
Why is it Miller looks alarmingly like the guy on the right?

BuffetBoy 3 Reviews 14 reads
posted
32 / 40

By injecting his snide comments, he lost what clearly would have been the upper hand. In sports parlance, he "played down to his competition." Great point!

anonymousfun 6 Reviews 17 reads
posted
33 / 40

you, Orange Organism and rest of your ilk live in.

I could post the video and show how the real world world thought. That will be a colossal waste of time since you wouldn't get it anyway!

Hpygolky 234 Reviews 23 reads
posted
34 / 40

First they must be creditable, and have a little cache, which Miller had neither. And it is there job, to get the truth, something you're not accustom to getting being glued to fox. Miller was not going to report the news in accordance to the book, he was like the walking National Enquirer on air, but that's probably a publication you subscribe to..
Sorry to say but that's one of the rules, they must be creditable, or they become "persona non grata", well except on fox.You may be used to having someone piss on your face and have them tell you it's raining...
And I doubt you'll see Miller again on TV except on fox...And did you hear that he refused to leave and they had to call security to remove him...what a guy.

-- Modified on 1/8/2018 10:01:08 PM

JackDunphy 20 reads
posted
35 / 40

This has NOTHING to do with Fox so not sure why you are so unhinged by mentioning them THREE times and diverting from CNN's fuck up here.  

 
Miller is a live wire, and Tapper knew that going in, He can be feisty and combative and Tapper went down to Miller's level, and showed himself to be emotionally and personally involved with his guest, which is quite odd for someone of Tapper's experience, but that is the norm these days at CNN as they have lost any journalistic integrity they ever had.

 
If Tapper didn't think Miller was credible, if he really is "persona non grata," than he shouldn't have had him on the air. Is this THAT difficult to understand?  

 
But if you are going to have him on, don't cry when he knocks your network, a network by the way that has gotten DOZENS of stories wrong bc of their shoddy and shit journalism and covers Trump negatively 90% of the time, per left of center studies.

bigguy30 24 reads
posted
36 / 40

It's not a Fox obsession Jack, but pointing out the truth about this fake newtork.
When they go off on Miller, you know it's bad!

-- Modified on 1/9/2018 1:21:21 PM

Hpygolky 234 Reviews 26 reads
posted
37 / 40

fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,....did you count that?....lol.

cajunman 25 reads
posted
38 / 40

How bright can he possible be?

He reads lib copy.

Miller beating on a dumbfuck like him just ain't fair! ;)

2465305 70 Reviews 19 reads
posted
39 / 40

I already proved he can't count to 3....you expect him to go that high?

Posted By: hpygolky
Re: Yo Bro.......check this out
fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,....did you count that?....lol.

anonymousfun 6 Reviews 27 reads
posted
40 / 40

I really hope you didn't 't watch and you are lying.

If you watched the whole thing, and you concluded Miller did an excellent job, you are dumber than the Orange Organism illegally occupying the WH and that is an accomplishment worth an Oscar!

Register Now!