They should have left the cameras rolling. Lol
What an ass beating!?! Speaking truth to FNN:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/01/07/stephen_miller_battles_cnns_jake_tapper_in_trump_tweet-approved_interview.html
You must have been watching something other than what I saw, if you saw it at all. Miller just did what he's done since childhood, which always left him playing in the sandbox all by himself! ![]()
-- Modified on 1/7/2018 12:49:08 PM
Every time his lips moved, I could tell he was lying. He is no more than a mindless sycophant. Miller would eat Trump's doo doo, and swear it was chocolate pudding! The world would know better, but Miller would come back for seconds!
I loved that he threw CNN's fake news back in Tapper's face time after time, specifically citing all there bogus and horrific reporting recently. Watching Tapper squirm was priceless as he had no answers.
Really embarrassing to watch a guy like Tapper, who once had a good rep, use the Wolff book as any type of legit source. especially with numerous LIBERALS now on record saying Wolff is a gutter snipe, liar and plays loose with the facts.
So why in the world would "the most trusted name in news," cough cough cough, mention ANYTHING he says as fact? Just when you think CNN couldn't go any lower, they always seem to manage to surprise to the downside.
Take a bow...Only a true trump supporter would have loved this. What I saw was that Miller wasn't going to interact with Tapper. Miller was avoiding answering the questions in detail, just spouting off how great trump is and just talking over Tapper. Miller was like a robot, echoing how great trump is as if trump was doing the interview. Trying to please the man at the WH, sitting on his sofa, chowing down on his Cheetos.
I lost track watching this heartless dead soul with the look of a man who has been embalmed with trump. His dead pan eyes had one mission, to discredit CNN and the book. No common dialect, he was going to hijack this interview...I knew where this interview was going.Tapper should have pulled the plug sooner, he gave him way too much time. Now, all Miller's done is regulate him to only fox, he's become the another version of Kellyanne Conway...a persona non grata by the mainstream media
The lame stream media shouldn't be determining anyone as a "persona non grata" in politics as that is NOT there job. It is there job to REPORT the news, and not choose sides and BECOME the news, like Tapper did.
Do I really have to tell you this?
Tapper lost his cool. That is ok. He is human. But some on this thread have lost their ability to analyze the fourth estates job. You are 100% correct. It is not the role of the media to determine winners or losers. It is their job to give all the pertinent info to the viewer and let him or her decide.
It was clear to anyone, who was not a political hack, that Miller had no intention to be interviewed, but to use the opportunity to be on TV for his, and his master's own political purpose.
Isn't the object of an interview, with a reporter, is to get the guest's opinion and not the other way around?
You'll find the answer! ![]()
First they must be creditable, and have a little cache, which Miller had neither. And it is there job, to get the truth, something you're not accustom to getting being glued to fox. Miller was not going to report the news in accordance to the book, he was like the walking National Enquirer on air, but that's probably a publication you subscribe to..
Sorry to say but that's one of the rules, they must be creditable, or they become "persona non grata", well except on fox.You may be used to having someone piss on your face and have them tell you it's raining...
And I doubt you'll see Miller again on TV except on fox...And did you hear that he refused to leave and they had to call security to remove him...what a guy.
-- Modified on 1/8/2018 10:01:08 PM
This has NOTHING to do with Fox so not sure why you are so unhinged by mentioning them THREE times and diverting from CNN's fuck up here.
Miller is a live wire, and Tapper knew that going in, He can be feisty and combative and Tapper went down to Miller's level, and showed himself to be emotionally and personally involved with his guest, which is quite odd for someone of Tapper's experience, but that is the norm these days at CNN as they have lost any journalistic integrity they ever had.
If Tapper didn't think Miller was credible, if he really is "persona non grata," than he shouldn't have had him on the air. Is this THAT difficult to understand?
But if you are going to have him on, don't cry when he knocks your network, a network by the way that has gotten DOZENS of stories wrong bc of their shoddy and shit journalism and covers Trump negatively 90% of the time, per left of center studies.
It's not a Fox obsession Jack, but pointing out the truth about this fake newtork.
When they go off on Miller, you know it's bad!
-- Modified on 1/9/2018 1:21:21 PM
fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,....did you count that?....lol.
I already proved he can't count to 3....you expect him to go that high?
fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,fox,....did you count that?....lol.
I really hope you didn't 't watch and you are lying.
If you watched the whole thing, and you concluded Miller did an excellent job, you are dumber than the Orange Organism illegally occupying the WH and that is an accomplishment worth an Oscar!
He let Miller get under his skin. Tapper was acting partisan and was condescending. Good reporters shelve their personal animus.
I do view Tapper as a journalist and not an entertainer, per se. He was impatient and snarky and he made himself part of the story. He shouldn't be mocking his guest, no matter what he feels personally about him or her. Tapper is not a partisan but I would be willing to bet he wasn't pleased with his performance. He is very good and just had an off interview, in my opinion.
I was just making the point he was coming across as partisan in this particular interview. We both agree that disrespecting his guest is unprofessional and I was quite surprised he did so.
It is nice to see a Democrat like yourself be non-partisan about this subject. The board seems to be completely polarized one way or the other.
I consider myself a "Progressive" and not a Democrat. The DNC has let me down on many occasions, but my liberalism never does.
We are in total agreement about the polarization of the board and I make an effort to see the other side of the aisle's view, as I am not in lock step with everything my party does and I will speak up when I am in disagreement.
I would hope we could all get there one day, but sometimes I do get caught up in the hyper partisanship world we live in too.
Enjoy your evening.
no matter what side of the aisle they're on. If you noticed the following interview with Adam Schiff, he quartered him about his speculating why the JD was re-opening investigations into Hillary. He asked on what basis he arrived at his opinion, and it became clear that there was not much of substance, he was able to, or willing to reveal, upon which his opinion rested on.
I want a hard, tough, interview regardless of the guest's political identification. But when it becomes personal, and the comments become snarky, he loses his professionalism to a degree. I first read about the interview on the Hill so please find the column attached.
The statements I had problems with were these Mattradd:
1) “I get it. There’s one viewer that you care about right now and you're being obsequious and you’re being a factotum in order to please him, OK,” Tapper said on "State of the Union," appearing to reference the president.
2) "After returning from a commercial break, Tapper appeared to chide Miller, telling viewers, “welcome back to 'State of the Union' and to planet Earth.”
Jake Tapper should be above comments like these. Ask the tough questions, sure, pounce when you see weakness or lies, of course, but act like a true professional always. Mocking or goading Mr. Miller should not be on the menu of an experienced, well respected journalist as Tapper, and just serves as fodder for Trump's out of touch base to yell "fake news" from the rafters.
I am not condemning Mr. Tapper, as I am a big fan, but I think he may have wanted parts of this interview back, if he could do it all over again. Thank you for your response and hearing me out.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/367803-tapper-cuts-off-heated-interview-with-miller
But I agree with you, and I'd rather have seen Tapper let Miller vapor on and then point out: "You realize you haven't remotely answered my question? I'll let you try again, but if you keep filibustering I'm going to have to end this interview."
Why is it Miller looks alarmingly like the guy on the right?
By injecting his snide comments, he lost what clearly would have been the upper hand. In sports parlance, he "played down to his competition." Great point!
The very definition of suckhole..
So clearly Trump and his supporters are not paying attention to their own bs network. Lol
Miller is nothing more than a lap dog. Simply pitiful! Another example of Trump-ites claiming to be the sane, adults in the room, and behaving like unpolished, rude, maniacs to make their point--pure example of cognitive dissonance!
to argue that you are in full control of your faculties!
Sorry Laffy, but I'm going to have to beat you to it. "I choose the best people for my administration!" ![]()
Miller did not state one single fact or specific reference to Wolfes book that he claimed was false. All he did was regurgitate his sycophantic Trump dogma and came off looking completely insane - again!
They should have left the cameras rolling. Lol
you, Orange Organism and rest of your ilk live in.
I could post the video and show how the real world world thought. That will be a colossal waste of time since you wouldn't get it anyway!
How bright can he possible be?
He reads lib copy.
Miller beating on a dumbfuck like him just ain't fair! ![]()

