Politics and Religion

Re: Wrong again
BigPapasan 3 Reviews 783 reads
posted
1 / 47

In March, 2020, Chuck Schumer said of Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch: “You’ve released the whirlwind and you will pay the price.”

 
No one was arrested for threatening Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.  But in February, 2025, FIVE YEARS LATER, Trump’s DOJ opened an investigation into Schumer’s remark.  FIVE YEARS LATER!!!!!

 
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/acting-u-s-attorney-inquiry-schumer-possible-threat-doge-supreme-court-justices/

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 31 reads
posted
2 / 47

willy: “…a Democrat activist, whom (sic) may have some connection to Schumer, we don’t know, tried to break into the home of one of those justices to murder him.”

 
It’s not very “civil” to post BULLSHIT, is it willy?
What was the name of the “Democrat activist?”
What connection did he have to Schumer? (Ooohhh, you admit you DON’T KNOW)
Which justice’s home did he break into?

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 33 reads
posted
3 / 47

Schumer’s remark - March, 2020
Your link - June, 2022……TWO YEARS LATER!!!!!!!

 
Try again, willy.  Go back to the TER Righty Ass Archives and pull another one out.

LostSon 43 Reviews 39 reads
posted
5 / 47

It was perfectly fine to enact Lawfare against Trump but now that he’s doing it… dems are screaming like scalded cats.

PS it’s funny that both Fannnni Willis and  “Tish” James are themselves both scammers and grifters.  

Willis paid her boyfriend fuck tons of money so he could take her on a bunch of expensive vacations scamming the people of Georgia out of hundreds of thousands of dollars…

Then “Tish” uses false hoods to apply for loans to buy investment houses and even claimed… what was it her daddy was her husband?

You can’t make this shit up.

Que Jabba to scream that I’m a racist for pointing out two black women prosecutors are corrupt. 🤷🏻‍♂️

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 31 reads
posted
6 / 47

…TWO YEARS LATER and had absolutely nothing to do with what Schumer said.  

 
“Phony” as anyone believing CocKSucker175 is “reasonable and intelligent.”

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 40 reads
posted
7 / 47

…LOSTSON misspelling “cue” AGAIN.  As he’s done for THREE YEARS:

 
7/17/2025, 4:42:24 PM
7/11/2025, 4:22:31 PM
6/40/2025, 2:34:03 PM
2/26/2025, 12:08:54 PM
2/6/2025,   11:52:08 AM
1/23/2025, 10:42:41 AM
12/7/2024, 2:53:12 AM
11/13/2024, 1:59:45 PM
8/9/2022,    1:56:25 PM

 
I could have enjoyed this for another three years but, ultimately, my sense of  ‘noblesse oblige’ leads me to assist someone less fortunate than I am.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 29 reads
posted
8 / 47

The guy wasn’t stewing for TWO YEARS because of what Schumer said and all of a sudden decided to take action.  

 
From your link:
“… he was angry about the possibility that the Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. Wade, and about the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas. He said he thought Kavanaugh would loosen gun laws.”

 
NOTHING about Schumer.  
NOTHING to indicate that the guy was in any way motivated by what Schumer said TWO YEARS EARLIER.

inicky46 61 Reviews 49 reads
posted
9 / 47

is his typical righty confusion about "lawfare," another word mis-used by that crowd. Like true Trump-bots they claim Trump was unfairly abused by the criminal justice system so that justifies his completely politicizing the Justice Dept. to go after his perceived enemies.
This is a classic Trumpian ploy he learned from the Satanic Roy Cohn: accuse your enemies of doing exactly what you intend to do (or ARE doing). Trump is the master of it. And toads like Loser obediently repeat his lies, helping him turn lies into truth. They shrink from the fact that Trump was convicted by juries of his peers. If the charges amounted to "lawfare" why were they so persuasive to juries of ordinary Americans?

crsm27 32 Reviews 31 reads
posted
10 / 47

Funny they go after spelling mistakes or grammar.   But not the content.

 
Yep.... James and Schiff are getting looked at for mortgage issues where they lied on federal forms.  (same thing they went after Trump).

 
Fanni.... getting in trouble for misuse of funds/rico type violations.... Same things she tried to go after Trump.

 
I know people will say.... BUT BUT BUT..... They were personal form Trump was doing on Business for overvaluing millions or billions etc.   The nuts and bolts of it was HE LIED ON FEDERAL FORMS.... that is what they got him for.  Yes it was the over valuation.... but it was because it was on federal forms.    Same goes for those two.   Just like if you or me fill out asset evaluation forms for a bank to get a line of credit or loan.  If they ask how much you have in an account, value of home, value of stocks, etc.    If you are off by $1.... it is technically LYING on a federal form.   Yeah they wont throw the book at you.   But by the letter of the law they could.    It is like going 1 MPH over the speed limit.... technically you are breaking the law.   but will you get a ticket... odds are NO.  

 
Now is it petty what is happening to these people........ maybe.... depends how much they all profited, lied, scammed, etc.   If it is in millions or is it in hundred?

LostSon 43 Reviews 42 reads
posted
11 / 47

Posted By: BigPapasan
Re: What I love about this thread is…
…LOSTSON misspelling “cue” AGAIN.  As he’s done for THREE YEARS:  
   
   
 7/17/2025, 4:42:24 PM  
 7/11/2025, 4:22:31 PM  
 6/40/2025, 2:34:03 PM  
 2/26/2025, 12:08:54 PM  
 2/6/2025,   11:52:08 AM  
 1/23/2025, 10:42:41 AM  
 12/7/2024, 2:53:12 AM  
 11/13/2024, 1:59:45 PM  
 8/9/2022,    1:56:25 PM  
   
   
 I could have enjoyed this for another three years but, ultimately, my sense of  ‘noblesse oblige’ leads me to assist someone less fortunate than I am.
You admit I’m not being racist by pointing out the two corrupt prosecutors? And instead are resorting to going Completely to stalking to deflect from the point that you dems tried Lawfare on Trump and it did not stop him from becoming president again?

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 33 reads
posted
12 / 47

These are plainly political bit jobs ordered by trump against these two perceived enemies.  I  can explain further, but I doubt you MAGA types care about anything but retribution.

inicky46 61 Reviews 46 reads
posted
13 / 47

I DID "go after "the content." And totally took apart the misuse of "lawfare."
I guess you were napping.

crsm27 32 Reviews 42 reads
posted
14 / 47

Are they?

 
The Fanni one will be the interesting one for sure.   Since the voter stuff and whistle blowers have come out.   If her name is involved with that.

 
Schiff.... not sure if his immunity covers him or not.... It might seem petty.   But isn't it breaking the law?

 
James...... The issue is it is the exact same thing she went after Trump.  So how can you go after someone for the exact crime you committed?

 
Here is one that honestly pisses me off.   Lying in front of congress is against the law (sworn testimony).   Yet many people do it nonstop.   WHY THE FUCK ARE THEY NOT GOING AFTER THEM.   This isn't a right vs left thing.   This is our political system and how fucked it is.   These people on both sides get caught lying and nothing happens.

-- Modified on 8/15/2025 3:19:03 PM

inicky46 61 Reviews 28 reads
posted
15 / 47

in order to support Republican depredations against the law and The Constitution in order to promote Trump's dictatorial power grabs, that is LIE-FARE.
From our leading Putin Stooge, Troll and....

marikod 1 Reviews 40 reads
posted
16 / 47

Not even close.

            All seven causes of action were brought under the New York “PERSISTENT FRAUD” business statute. The AG alleged over 200 false and misleading statements in various financial statements over a ten year period.  Trump made $355 million in interest savings and property sales facilitated by the false statements.  There’s Bernie Madoff (billions) and then Trump whose liability is now up to half a billion thanks to judgment interest, although I expect some reduction on appeal. Does this sound even remotely comparable to the alleged misrepresentations of  residence in a few consumer loan applications? What did they save? A couple  thousand?  

And where do you get that the “nuts and bolts” of how the  AG “got Trump” was because he lied on FEDERAL FORMS? There were no federal charges, most of the forms were private party forms, and proving the use of federal forms had nothing to do with the state causes of action. Schiff used Freddy MAC or Fanny Mae mortgage applications which opens the door to wire fraud and mail fraud.

Petty? Not as to Trump.

inicky46 61 Reviews 46 reads
posted
17 / 47
crsm27 32 Reviews 61 reads
posted
18 / 47

They tried to get him on federal charges.  Statute of Limitations ran out.  Which is why they had to go after him with state charges.  

Now to explain why they all could be FEDERAL Charges.

But one of the charges of Trumps was because he "overvalued" assets to gain "favorable" loan terms.   The value of Mar-A-lago, the apartment, etc.   Lied about size of apartment, etc.   Yeah that was one of the charges.  You know why.... those forms were used to get a that were BACKED BY THE FDIC.   A business form... a financial statement he filled out or his business filled out... yeah it was a 10 year period.  So they used forms to "defraud" to get federal loan or federal backed loan.  

Also many of your "private" or "personal" party forms are still federal forms if they are used to get loans.  Since loans are backed by FDIC.  Look at fine print on those forms... if it says FDIC on it.   I looked at one I fill out for my bank I fill out every year.   I just need to list my personal assets, accounts, etc.  Guess what... fine print... FDIC.   All this form is info they want on file.

 
So what did Schiff and James do.... LIE ON A FEDERAL FORM.   Any loan applications for homes are federal forms since loans are backed by the FDIC.   LIke you mentioned... if they used a Feddy or Fanny loan or application it could be even worse.... and if wire fraud is an issue....ie: across state lines.    Yes just moving money gained by lying on an application from one state to another via wire transfer is wire fraud.  

 
You are talking about interest on his what is owed?  His fines?   Or interest in what he saved via getting these loans?   Loan terms are actually negotiable... yeah.  YOu can go into your banks and negotiate any loan you want... doesn't mean you are going to get it.   Also the rate at which the fed will secure it and amount is a different story.   Also depends if it will be an in house loan or how the loan is backed.

-- Modified on 8/15/2025 4:24:22 PM

inicky46 61 Reviews 36 reads
posted
19 / 47

And, in fact, NY has been doing just fine. We don't need grifters, fraudsters and convicted felons to succeed.

LostSon 43 Reviews 30 reads
posted
20 / 47

Posted By: inicky46
Re: Thanks for you year-and-a-half-old "news."
And, in fact, NY has been doing just fine. We don't need grifters, fraudsters and convicted felons to succeed.
Oh yeah with the impending election of a democratic socialist…🙄

marikod 1 Reviews 53 reads
posted
21 / 47

“to defraud  to get federal loans or federal backed loans” of over 200 million?

Sorry, I am not following you at all on this. What do you mean "backed"? The FDIC insures deposits up to $250,000. If they insure business loans by a German bank over 200 million, that would be news to me. Maybe you were thinking of the SBA which does guaranty a percentage of small business loans – but I think the limit there is $150,000 – the German loans were way over that amount.  I still can’t find any federal nexus at all.

               As to your question, the interest I was talking about was pre- judgment interest on the $355 million judgment and post- judgment interest (9%) on the total judgment.  One interesting side note is that, unless the Appellate Division enters judgment – not withstanding the verdict – for Trump (I’m hoping the dashes will keep one of our favorite posters from another hopelessly confused meltdown), they are royally screwing Trump by taking so long to decide the case. He is paying nearly $12,000 a day in interest. If he follows his usual playbook and appeals to the Court of Appeals and then petitions SCOTUS on some excessive fines due process theory, we could be looking at a nearly a billion dollar judgment unless reduced.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 41 reads
posted
22 / 47

there are many things "we don't know", so you would probably also agree with me that the way to learn the things we don't know is through an investigation, right?   I agree that waiting five years to start the investigation is egregious, but there are many failures from the Biden administration that have to be addressed now.  This is but ONE of them.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 31 reads
posted
23 / 47

Yet ONLY THREE DAYS after the Texas floods, when SnowKing69 was talking about the need for an investigation as to the cause of the flood, you COEUR-DE-LION, posted this in response:
“ What are they going to investigate?  Sure, you can investigate, but if you think the culprit is going to be anything other than the flood waters, you need to look up the term, ‘force majeure.’”

 
ROFLMAO!!!!  
Do you, COEUR-DE-LION, see the irony in wanting an investigation on a five year old matter but dismiss the need for an investigation into the cause of a flood while they were still pulling the bodies of 27 innocent little girls out of the water three days later?

 
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
http://youtu.be/hxGgnI6kCrs

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 32 reads
posted
24 / 47

…away like the gutless right coward he is.  

 
He wants an investigation of Schumer’s remarks FIVE YEARS LATER, but only THREE DAYS after the Texas flood he said no investigation was necessary.  

 
You, SnowKing69, BRILLIANTLY kept calling for an investigation, even 10 days after you first did.  And 10 days later COEUR-DE-LION was still saying:
“You keep asking for an investigation.  What are you going to investigate?  There was a flood?!!“

 
And it’s all because COEUR-DE-LION kept squawking “force majeure” like a parrot.   AND JUST LIKE A PARROT, COEUR-DE-LION HAD ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE WHAT IT MEANT.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 56 reads
posted
25 / 47

You want an investigation of Chuck Schumer FIVE YEARS after he made some remarks.  But only THREE DAYS after the Guadalupe River flood you said NO investigation was necessary.  

 
COEUR-DE-LION: “…the way we learn things we don’t know is through an investigation, right?“  Right, COEUR-DE-LION?

 
RUN!!!!  BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 25 reads
posted
26 / 47

…who runs away from claiming there needs to be an investigation of a FIVE YEAR OLD statement by Chuck Schumer but said there doesn’t need to be an investigation of the Guadalupe River flood only THREE DAYS after the flood because it was unforseeable.  

 
It’s ironic that DURRAN421 is White Knighting for COUER-DE-LION when it was DURRAN421 who proved COEUR-DE-LION is a fucking moron for claiming the flood was unforseeable.  

 
Two days after the flood , DURRAN421 posted:
“The company I work for has 2 offices in both east and west TX. We did not rely (on) a NWS report when we knew from local weather reports.  WE KNEW THE POTENTIAL (FOR) FLOODING WAS GREAT.” (Emphasis added)

 
The next day COEUR-DE-LION would post that NO ONE would be liable for the deaths and destruction because the flood was “unforseeable.”

 
ROFLMAO!!  Thank you, DURRAN421 for proving what idiots COEUR-DE-LION and MARIKOD are for claiming there would be no liability for the flood.  I’m sure you will be very busy testifying as an expert witness for the plaintiffs in all the lawsuits to come.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 22 reads
posted
27 / 47

…from the fact YOU proved the flood was predictable BEFORE COEUR-DE-LION & MARIKOD said it was unforseeable?   Why aren’t you PROUD for once in your imbecilic life that you actually said something smart?  Seriously, are you that dumb that you’d run away from a SMART post?  SMH

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 37 reads
posted
28 / 47

White Knighted AGAINST himself!!!  Instead of taking credit for posting something SMART for once in your miserable life, you’re running away from it as fast as you can.  You must be deathly afraid of exposing COEUR-DE-LION & MARIKOD as idiots.  
You really are the SPOAT.  
You are pathetic.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 31 reads
posted
29 / 47

Why do you constantly and incessantly repeat yourself? Stalker and troll. Troll and stalker. Do you really have so little intellect and imagination that you are incapable of posting anything new? We've all given up a long time ago of you posting anything interesting or meaningful.  And to prove my point you will now accuse me of being a stalker or troll. Go ahead. Make my day.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 22 reads
posted
31 / 47

You can't even come up with anything original as a retort. So just repeat what I wrote. You may think that makes you witty. It doesn't. It makes you appear witless.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 28 reads
posted
32 / 47

Trust me but you are the last person that I'd be following anywhere.  Your posts are compete nonsense and repetition. Let the record reflect that I didn't get "the boot" for anything, but I do recall you specifically named as being in some childish squabble. This is an open forum, so I have as much right as you to post freely. I realize MAGA types like you think the 1st amendment only applies to them, but it doesn't.  If you don't like pushback you should remain silent. Let's try to keep this above the childish squabble level so Admin doesn't need to step in again. Time to move on despite your insatiable need to call me a stalker and a troll.

followme 28 reads
posted
33 / 47

Left out that inicky46 was also specifically named as being in some childish squabble.

As for troll and stalker there is another who uses those words as much if not more than durran, can you name him …hint he is one of your fellow lefties.  

Yes you as do all of us have the right to post freely, then you go on to say if he does not like push back he should remain silent. Seems that you are the one saying the first amendment only applies to you.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 26 reads
posted
34 / 47

Somehow you have confused replying to what you post as "follow me around". If any post of yours has any merit, you should welcome a reply and a debate. Instead you consider a reply as stalking and trolling. Not only do you have no confidence in what you have posted, but you lack an understanding of the meaning of stalk and troll. I'm not here to educate you or to boost your shaky confidence. Again I did not get "the axe", but I know you were chastised and castigated by Admin for your childish behavior.  Now can we get on with a more salient debate that doesn't involve you calling anyone a stalker or troll or repeating what has just been posted?

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 29 reads
posted
35 / 47

If this is your idea of being a white knight for duran, you come  across more like the Black Knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Yours has to be one of the worse defenses I have ever read. But hey that's your 1st amendment right to make a fool of yourself.  

followme 31 reads
posted
36 / 47

I was not white knighting or defending for anyone.

I was simply pointing out your dishonesty of not mentioning that inicky was also included and specifically named as being in some childish squabble. And then then in another post dishonestly did not mention that inicky was also chastised and castigated by Admin for childish behavior.  Why did you not mention his name along with durran?

You are the one who told him to remain silent, you cannot deny that  
To quote you “If you don't like pushback you should remain silent.”  
However being more reasonable then you I do not and never have proposed, suggested or advocated you, or anyone, remain silent.
 You are very sensitive as you sure can dish it out but cannot take it. You know that push back stuff.

I look forward to your reply (because unlike you I do not advocate you remain silent) and what additional false accusations you come up with.

inicky46 61 Reviews 36 reads
posted
37 / 47

The SPOAT is also Top Hypocrite Of All Time . The THOAT

inicky46 61 Reviews 32 reads
posted
38 / 47

And now I predict he will leap to also grab the last word.

RespectfulRobert 35 reads
posted
39 / 47

He hasn't had a review removed in over a week! hahahahahahahahahahaha!

followme 29 reads
posted
40 / 47

Beta bobbie tried to hit you with his purse and missed ….again

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 30 reads
posted
41 / 47

You weren't white knighting. You were black knighting. You may need to Google that. You seem to be having trouble comprehending the thread. I was replying to durran's incorrect accusation that I had been suspended.  I wasn't,  but durran was identified by Admin for his juvenile behavior. I reminded durran of that fact. There was no reason to name other parties.   Further, because durran was crying "stalker" and "troll" whenever I opposed him, I reminded him that if he can't handle pushback the solution is not to not post. The other option is to "man up" and stop being a "whiney little bitch". He can post as much foolishness and cry all he as he wants, but he should expect there will be pushback. He should stop being such a pussy about it.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 27 reads
posted
42 / 47

Willy completely  meets the definition of a troll, so I call him a troll.  That's a person who posts provocative or offensive content to cause conflict. That's Willy from head to toe... from dawn to dusk.... from start to finish. Of course, it appears the troll is in a time-out at the moment so durran can come to his defense.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 32 reads
posted
43 / 47

I'm not talking about anyone except followme, Willy, and you. I've said what I need to say and explained my position. If you have an issue with Papi, or anyone else, you should bring it up with him/them.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 33 reads
posted
44 / 47

Your level of stupidity is mind-boggling. I call Willy a troll because he fits the definition of a troll. You call me a troll and a stalker because you can't handle the feedback when I reply to one of your inane posts. Stop being such a pussy, pussy. Man up.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 28 reads
posted
45 / 47

On this thread just 2 days ago you called me a "freak stalker" and that I was trolling your posts. Eventually, you post so much bullshit you can't even remember what you posted 2 days ago. As for who I choose to write reviews on, that's the core activity of this website and none of your business.  Likewise, while I find it odd that your reviews were taken down is none of my my business.  Try to stay on topic and refrain from a personal subject, irrelevant to this thread, that will earn you a suspension.

jazzman121847 111 Reviews 31 reads
posted
46 / 47

I've never been suspended so what you claim to know is 100% wrong. But hey being 100% wrong has never stopped you before. Anyone, like you, who claims to know everything knows nothing, and your buffoonery is on full display. Plus, despite your earlier denial, you have confirmed that you called me a stalker and a troll. So in summary you are 100% wrong. Maybe you should take a break and and start over. I don't expect you to apologize to me but you should apologize to the board for wasting their time with your lies.

inicky46 61 Reviews 33 reads
posted
47 / 47

Earlier in the branch he said "two" other posters plus you were giving a time out. Then just above it magically became three. And he was wrong about you. What a lying idiot.

Register Now!