Politics and Religion
"On October 18, millions of us are rising again to show the world: America has no kings, and the power belongs to the people."
Find you local demonstration . . .
www.nokings.org
- - -
"A core principle behind all No Kings events is a commitment to nonviolent action. We expect all participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with our values and to act lawfully at these events. Weapons of any kind, including those legally permitted, should not be brought to events." - nokings
- - -
"The No Kings protests are not centrally funded and are instead organized by a coalition of grassroots and progressive groups, including the ACLU, Indivisible, MoveOn, and others. Local organizers often fund their own events through community efforts. Right-wing and Republican figures have repeatedly made unsubstantiated claims that the protests are funded by George Soros or are part of Antifa, accusations rejected by organizers." - Gemini AI
C’mon , a grown man loosing it over what??!
Get a grip, don’t be that guy
Remember when.....
However pus, the from AI you posted states, “These were largely peaceful” Largely peaceful AI Overview
The phrase "largely peaceful" is used to describe protests or events where the majority of participants are non-violent, even if isolated incidents of violence, property destruction, or clashes occur
. The use of this phrase, particularly in media reports, became controversial during the widespread Black Lives Matter and anti-police brutality protests in the United States in the summer of 2020.
Controversy and criticism
The controversy centers on whether the phrase is an accurate reflection of events or a biased and misleading description, especially when property damage and clashes are highly visible.
• Minimizing violence and damage: Critics argue that using "largely peaceful" minimizes or dismisses the seriousness of the violence and destruction that did happen. The most cited example of this is an August 2020 CNN report from Kenosha, Wisconsin, which used the on-screen text "FIERY BUT MOSTLY PEACEFUL PROTESTS" while live footage showed buildings burning in the background.
• Focusing on one aspect: Some argue that it is misleading to classify a large event as "mostly peaceful" if the violent minority's actions were significant or received substantial media coverage. The contrast between the phrase and the imagery of fires or looting led many, particularly on the political right, to label the reporting as dishonest.
• Alternative framing: Opponents of the phrase have suggested that it is more accurate to describe what is happening, rather than providing a subjective characterization. They contend that a protest is either peaceful or not, and significant violence negates the "peaceful" descriptor for the event as a whole.
• Political motivations: Claims of political bias from news organizations were common, with critics suggesting that favorable media outlets were covering for groups they politically supported.
Justifications for use
Those who use the phrase typically justify it by asserting that it provides necessary context for large, multi-day, or multi-location events.
• Representing the majority: In a large protest, only a tiny fraction of attendees may be involved in criminal activity. The term "largely peaceful" accurately reflects the experience of the majority of people participating and distinguishes their actions from those of a small, disruptive group.
• Preventing a broad-brush narrative: Advocates for the term argue that portraying an entire movement as violent due to the actions of a few would be a distortion of the facts. This framing prevents opponents from delegitimizing the entirety of a protest movement or a social cause.
• Maintaining a neutral, descriptive tone: From this perspective, the term isn't a judgment, but an attempt to describe the reality of a complex situation where both peaceful protest and violence occurred simultaneously. Also “many city police departments reporting no arrests or major incidents." that says there were or may have been some incidents.
No one believes you when you lie by saying you hoped for no violence. In her foul heart of hearts, Felcher KNOWS she secretly hoped for violence she could blame on the left. She knows it, and so does everyone else here. But no doubt Felcher will keep lying...just as she will keep on putting up her weak and feeble memes.
So long, Felcher....
when pus says weak feeble meme it means it hit home, got under his skin, hit a nerve and deeply hurt his feelings.
-- Modified on 10/19/2025 11:57:01 AM
FelchQueen goes to bed dreaming she gets under my skin. Only proving I live rent-free in her sad excuse for a brain.
Hint: that laughter she hears is everyone here laughing AT her, not WITH her.
Poor Queen...
who is rapidly becoming our most notorious yet feckless twit and liar.
Yes, it's true. FelchQueen is
What a weakling.
Militant nokings protesters demonstrating radical defiance in the streets . . .
Posting two replies you your one post bothers you. Really? 
Watching pus get all upset over the most petty things. 
Must really get you in a tizzy 
Pus you going to try to hit me with your purse?
I doubt it, but if so would one of you please tell him he's serially embarrassing himself with an orgy of weak memes?
What a pathetic display Felcher...
Rage on
Rant on
This is not new. She always does.
But her current paroxysm of lies is remarkable even by her pitifully low standards.
I must have deeply injured her.
Hey, Felcher!
Try again
Clearly the serial beatings I have inflicted on her have given her PTSD. Either that or she's distracted by her raging yeast infection.
Poor Queen...
So once again you tried to hit me with your purse and missed.
Try again @realfelcherickypus
