...and so on  and blame it on the right, as they always do."

 
Hey Felcher - there was a No Kings Day on June 14, 2025.  More than FIVE MILLION people attended rallies across the country.  How many of those FIVE MILLION people rioted, caused trouble and so on, and blamed it on the right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Kings_protests

Got any stats or did you just pull that out of your ass like the monkey moron you are?

...and his fellow righty morons:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56B1vHWweKk

Most of the right will be doing nothing but eye rolling thru this stupid shit...The local freak show has one planned about 30 miles south of me in a town of about 18,000.  There will be about 250 nutjobs ranting and raving.  I wonder if the organizers were able to get replacement signs for the free palestiners in time, lol!

And yes, I'm going to put on my original red hat with megaphone and in hand to walk amongst them and see if I can get one of them to try and knock it off my head.

Wear your MAGA hat and bring a megaphone.  Walk amongst the people and see if you can get one of them to try and knock your MAGA hat off your head.

 
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/re-i-get-it-but-not-a-fan-477148?page=1

I did in fact hope there was no violence or riots and
In an above post (2 days ago) I said “Unlike you and your leftist comrades I hope there are no riots or violence of ang kind.”  

Now that it is over there was no riots or violence that I heard or read about and I’m glad about that.  

 
However  pus, the from  AI you posted states, “These were largely peaceful”

Largely peaceful

AI Overview
The phrase "largely peaceful" is used to describe protests or events where the majority of participants are non-violent, even if isolated incidents of violence, property destruction, or clashes occur
. The use of this phrase, particularly in media reports, became controversial during the widespread Black Lives Matter and anti-police brutality protests in the United States in the summer of 2020.  
Controversy and criticism
The controversy centers on whether the phrase is an accurate reflection of events or a biased and misleading description, especially when property damage and clashes are highly visible.
• Minimizing violence and damage: Critics argue that using "largely peaceful" minimizes or dismisses the seriousness of the violence and destruction that did happen. The most cited example of this is an August 2020 CNN report from Kenosha, Wisconsin, which used the on-screen text "FIERY BUT MOSTLY PEACEFUL PROTESTS" while live footage showed buildings burning in the background.
• Focusing on one aspect: Some argue that it is misleading to classify a large event as "mostly peaceful" if the violent minority's actions were significant or received substantial media coverage. The contrast between the phrase and the imagery of fires or looting led many, particularly on the political right, to label the reporting as dishonest.
• Alternative framing: Opponents of the phrase have suggested that it is more accurate to describe what is happening, rather than providing a subjective characterization. They contend that a protest is either peaceful or not, and significant violence negates the "peaceful" descriptor for the event as a whole.
• Political motivations: Claims of political bias from news organizations were common, with critics suggesting that favorable media outlets were covering for groups they politically supported.  
Justifications for use
Those who use the phrase typically justify it by asserting that it provides necessary context for large, multi-day, or multi-location events.
• Representing the majority: In a large protest, only a tiny fraction of attendees may be involved in criminal activity. The term "largely peaceful" accurately reflects the experience of the majority of people participating and distinguishes their actions from those of a small, disruptive group.
• Preventing a broad-brush narrative: Advocates for the term argue that portraying an entire movement as violent due to the actions of a few would be a distortion of the facts. This framing prevents opponents from delegitimizing the entirety of a protest movement or a social cause.
• Maintaining a neutral, descriptive tone: From this perspective, the term isn't a judgment, but an attempt to describe the reality of a complex situation where both peaceful protest and violence occurred simultaneously.  

Also “many city police departments reporting no arrests or major incidents."

that says there were or may have been some incidents.  

to quote from what you quoted  
Tarro lit up a cigarette as people yelled, “loser, loser” and “fascist.”  

since there is no mention of taro saying or doing anything provocative, it is clear that people were trying to provoke him.

 
Also from your link “People surrounding the two Proud Boys yelled “pedophile defender.” That sounds very provocative.  

 
Apparently the two police officers escorted them from so the crowd, to protect them from likely crowd violence as it must have appeared, to the police,  the crowd was going to turn violent on them.  

who is rapidly becoming our most notorious yet feckless twit and liar.
Yes, it's true. FelchQueen is

Face it, Slow Eddy, yer in a tailspin over this no kings BS.