So Trump just got his moment to thump his chest and babble his usual word salad. "Air ships." rofl.

And the left went nuts claiming that none of us gave Obama "any" credit for doing so.

because she’s  too busy with the shampeachment lol

assassination than Obama was.  At the time, al queda was washed up and Obama was hiding out.  The Obama hit was all about "revenge: for 9-11.  This strike was military strategy since bagdadi was still a threat to reorganize ISIS after the US leaves Syria.  

How fucking pathetic.

to the military for the successful mission, which was green-lighted by Trump, and then  she pivoted into bashing Trump for pulling out of Syria, even though HE gave the order to kill Bagdadi before they turned out the lights and closed the door on US occupation in Syria.  

We already knew you haven't got the dimmest clue about what impeachment is, or about the Constitution.
So you are a perfect addition to your little group.

The polls on Americans who want Trump impeached seem to be heading the other way the last few days.  With the assassination of Baghdadi, Trump may be viewed a lot more positively in the new few weeks, putting the screws to the Dem impeachment effort.  The next few weeks will be telling.  

Three times in place of Bin Ladin.  Note to self, drink coffee BEFORE posting in the morning.  Lol

There was no "US occupation in Syria." We only had about 1,000 troops in the entire area, FAR too few to be an occupying force. They were only there to support a liaison mission to the Kurds, who did the real "occupying." Until we pulled the rug out from under them.
In fact, reports say this killing was in the planning stage since August and Trump almost ruined it by his hasty and Ill-planned withdrawal from Syria, which made the whole effort to get Baghdadi much more difficult and dangerous. It is a tribute to the skill and courage of our Special Ops people that they succeeded anyway.
But thanks for your military wisdom, Generalissimo.

First of all, it wasn't "Obama hiding out," it was OSAMA!
And who else besides YOU said it was all about revenge? First of all, what's wrong with exacting revenge for 9/11? And, in fact, the Bin Laden and Baghdadi executions were virtually identical. Both were on the run and in hiding but still running their operations. So, for you another FAIL.
Most hilarious is your total speculation at the end about the Syria bug-out being all part of Trump's brilliant plan. BWWWWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
If that's true, why didn't ANYONE else in our gummint know about it so they could prepare an orderly withdrawal? In fact, this raid has been in the planning since last August, before even our dimwit Prez had thought about getting out of Syria. As I pointed out in another post, Trump's bug-out jeopardized the raid and made it much more dangerous for our troops.
Nice job, Don The Chickenhawk.

Is it true senators can’t campaign during a senate impeachment hearing?  

"Killing an enemy is not the same as defeating an enemy." - said in various ways by many military and political leaders over many centuries, including comments about the death of Baghdadi.  
.
Commentators I heard said that the CIA and other intel are trying to figure out who will likely replace Baghdadi and how they will track, understand, or target that successor and future ISIS activities.

From The NY Times: "But Mr. Trump’s abrupt withdrawal order three weeks ago disrupted the meticulous planning underway and forced Pentagon officials to speed up the plan for the risky night raid before their ability to control troops, spies and reconnaissance aircraft disappeared with the pullout, the officials said.

No wonder he pushed out and declined to throw out the first pitch.

-- Modified on 10/28/2019 6:06:53 AM

Actually, you are coo-coo enough to be all three of them.  Here's a nice shot I found of you and Wu, getting ready to fling your poo.

For example, you can click on a post after it goes up and hit the "Edit" button to fix any of your numerous errors.
But given the amount of mistakes and idiocies you put up here, it would be smarter to just have Admin pull the entire post.

At least CDL admits it when he makes a mistake. Of course if you were to admit to every mistake you have made here, it would most likely take up your entire day.

But apparently you don't.  There is a four-hour window to edit a post.  After that, you won't see  the edit button.  Duh.

If you really care you can ask Admin to edit your post and they'll do it.
Duh.

In fact, I've busted poor Cur for being blatantly WRONG almost as many times as I've busted YOU and NEITHER of you admits it 99.9999999% of the time.
Are you trying to sew up this week''s Pot/Kettle/Black Award on Monday?

Is the fact that Trump gave the military more praise and credit in that one press conference than obama did in 8 years.

keeping the site open with, I would never impose like that.  I fixed it in a way that didn't inconvenience ANYBODY.  That's just the way I roll.

That just can't seem to EVER admit when they are wrong.  Its not me, and its not GaG.  Which three are left?

-- Modified on 10/28/2019 3:56:32 PM

spinning it to try to minimize that Trump's hit was bigger and more important than Obama's.  Bin Ladin's successor turned out to be his son.  Guess who got him?  Trump.  I'm sure Trump can handle whoever the successor of Baghdadi turns out to be.  He'll have four more years to get him.  Let them whine at CNN..  

Rather than simply taking the L when you fuck up, which is ALL the time. You simply hide, or attempt to hide or destroy the evidence, no wonder you voted for Hillary.

I think we have already figured out who "was" going to replace Baghdadi, now we just have to figure out which one we get next

Isn't that what's called lying? Not to mention hypocrisy, coming as it does from our leading fact-bender and torturer of the truth.
Oh, look! I edited this post! WAAAAAAaaaahhhh!

did all three edits within the four-hour time window.  It was good that you practiced editing it three times.  At your age, you might remember it longer.   Personally, I don't consider you THAT old, since I have now started my 60's, but I did hear that you were at an antique auction once and they were bidding on you.

But I would call killing them one after another after another is the very definition of "eternal vigilance" Especially when it comes to killing their leaders before they even get a chance to lead.

You actually still can edit after four hours, it's just a different process. I will occasionally find an error in one of my posts I want to correct after the "Edit" function is disabled. Admin is always willing to help make the correction. That's not pulling a post, simply making sure it's accurate. Something that you, Wu and swallowpee don't care about.
So carry on with your ignorance by all means.

You do now that "eternal" means forever, right? You never totally defeat such an enemy just by killing them off one by one. New adherents, or minor variants, pop up. Indoctrinated children grow up to indoctrinate their children.  
.
You have to change the culture and and ideals of such an enemy.

Died in the same blast, along with five other top ISIS members.  It took Obama a year to get the successor to Bin Laden.  Trump just got a 2-fer.  How efficient is THAT?  

Just look at the US, the white Christians changed the "culture and ideals" of the indigenous people here pretty much by wiping them off the face of the earth, and this is hardly the only example I can think of, history is full of wars that were won NOT by changing the "culture and ideals" of an enemy but by wiping out said enemy.  I guess you were sleeping during all your history classes in school.

I said, "You never totally defeat such an enemy just by killing them off one by one."  What YOU are talking about is "genocide" or "ethnic cleansing" or similar. Is that what you are suggesting "we" do today?  
.
Who will you go after first and how will you wipe them out? Bombs? Germs? Chemicals? ... Just remeber, that when you're done, Trump will be coming for you.

have been based for hundreds, if not thousands, of years on a "TRIBAL" structure, where you have one very powerful leader, and no clear chain of command or succession under that leader.  Killing the leader and a few of his closest aids like Trump did will set them back months, if not years, in reorganizing.  Followers don't always accede to the wishes of the dead leader on who should take over, and there may be extended in-fighting on who gets to be the successor.  

The ragheads and the thumpers have been fighting a war of  "My God is better than your God" for roughly two thousand years, with countless millions of casualties and still no end in sight. Maybe killing them in "bigger bunches" really is the only ultimate solution.

I don't recall any Jews beheading Christians, throwing Gays off the tops of tall buildings, blowing up innocent civilians, etc, etc etc.