Yes we will all take that very seriously. lol
.
Speaking of her poll numbers....she was leading Trump nationally on August 1 by 1.2%. Today, she leads by 3.1%. On what planet would that be considered "declining?" lol.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/
.
And you of all people know that she has taken the lead in the state polling too, as you run away from the RCP map you were so in love with just a few weeks ago. Trump had 312 EVs at his height and now she leads 273-265.
.
Now allow me to show you the current map since you can never seem to find it these days:

from our resident political hacks.

If it weren’t for leaks, we wouldn’t have known via Halperin  and others which weekend Biden was dropping out of the race.  

He pooh-poohs actual new stories with named sources if he doesn't like them, simply because he dis-trusts the publication. Then he fails to point out that leaks with un-named sources are often wrong.
ChicKie needs to calm down.

Was Halperin wrong? No. In fact he was spot on. And all he  gave us was unnamed sources. But since it was a negative story, the liberals here whined “unnamed sources”. I rest my case.

In fact, he didn't even rebut my point.

for Kamala.  When the Nazi's did it, it was very successful to manage and suppress the population.  

Had you done so, you would see she has 270+ EVs per a poll YOU pointed us to. lol. NY Times/Siena shows her leading in PA, MI and WI and her tied with him in NC, GA, AZ and NV.  
.
Let me put it another way. In the 7 key swing states, Trump leads in NONE of them. I would expect crap like this from Lester or Willy, but this just shows how little you pay attention to details, how much of a partisan hack you are and how deceived you can be from click bait.  
.
So that is now the NY Times, The Hill, CNN, 538, and RCP all having her with 270+ EVs. Thanks for helping me in adding NYT to that ever growing list. lol.

Interesting that NY Times, Rasmussen, and Baris Big Data Poll all have Trump +1.  Liberals love to hate Rasmussen, even though it called both 2016 and 2020 within the MOE and predicted the winning candidate.

Welker: "Do you think Kamala is abandoning her progressive ideals?"  
.
Bernie: "No... I think she is trying to be pragmatic and do what she thinks is right in order to win the election."

Yesterday PolyMarket had declined for Trump to just +2.  Today just after the NY Times poll result of Trump +1, the PloyMarket has swung (at this hour) to Trump +6.  

I am glad to educate you. And it's not "liberals" hating them Lester. It's when the math is looked at they were found out to be frauds. 538 found them SO biased as to not even consider them anymore. But keep pushing debunked polling companies like them and Trafalgar. It's pretty funny seeing how far you will go to embarrass yourself but I know you just can't stop.

And Hpy has already shown Silver to be in Polymarkets pocket. Damn you are bad at this.

He’s laying out a suckers bet . Bet Trump , but cash in on Harris.. quietly.
He also plays into the trump narrative if trump should loose the election. Trump complaint and his lead to Jan6  do over is if he should loose is
1- Put the Nate Silver poll had me ahead, how can I loose  
2- 25M illegals votes for Harris because of our open borders  
3- My rallies had 100’s of thousands people…that’s why he holds rallies. Not to be informative but to just be there. Say shit who cares… just hold them rallys  
See, that’s Trump game  and what he’ll do if he looses. So Silver becomes that useful idiot playing both sides

He still has Harris +1 in the popular vote, compared to NY Times having Trump +1.  
.
Due to the electoral college bias in favor of Republicans, the Dem candidate needs to be up 3 or more in the popular vote to have a chance at winning.  
.
Why theorize about Nate Silver motivations when there the plain facts say that Kamala is presently underwater.
.
Nobody is saying she can't pull it out.  This is just the state of the race today.  Don't need conspiracy theories at this point.

Or you are just being dishonest. The NY Times has her at 270+ EVs. Today's poll from them has her ahead in PA, MI and WI. Only you would think her winning the electoral college as of today by 5 different, respected groups would mean she is under water. smh

Robert could, if he wanted to, argue in good faith. Instead, they whine, complain and essentially shoot the messenger.

It's The Hill, CNN, 538 and the RCP all consistently showing her having enough EVs as of today. Thats just a fact and you and Lester dont seem to like facts.

The NY Times new Pa poll will tip that state in her favor. What a swing! It was Trump at 312 just weeks ago and now it will be Kamala at 292 when they update. What a turn around!

The state polling, as you well know is much more important. And there is a very wide consensus she is winning the EC, but again, it is VERY close. She has many more paths than he does and he is defending states now that he was cruising in just a month ago. She doesn't need any of the sun belt states to win yet she is tied in all of them, per the NYT.

Even his own people say that! They wish he stuck to the teleprompter but he doesn't have the intelligence or restraint to do so.

State polls are less accurate than national polls.  People refer to state polls when the race is tight.  Probably useful to look at state polls when the range is between Republican less than +1 and Democrat less than +3.  This is the electoral college bias effect that favors Republicans by 3 or 4 points.    
.
So if Trump is up in the polls by, say, 2, and swing state polls have Harris winning, the state polls are probably wrong.
.
It's a statistical thing.

Interesting the it's R+2.   Not sure I believe that.  Many polls are weighted D+2 or more.  If this is a bad weight then the poll might mistakenly favor Trump a bit.  On the otherhand, if the D/R split is R+2, many polls are underestimating Trump.  
.
Gender split confirmed.  But the interesting thing is the age split. 18-29's are not more Democrat. More independents between 18-44 than loyalists in either party.   30-44 are D+7.  But 44-64 are R+9.  

Nicky made a habit of looking down his nose at any Kamala story relying on unnamed sources.

over again, what sticks out to me is how we are all looking at the same polls and the Lefties here have no clue on how to interpret them.  Sadly, this continued all the way up to election day.  All of we conservatives could read between the lines on the news and polls that were out there, but the Dems here were living in fantasyland and thought something was happening that really wasn't.  

and then the entire right-wing drool crew jumps into a splooge-fest on it.  
You really can't do any better than this? Pathetic.

I made tens of thousands in the market last week. Don't believe me? Who cares? That money is still mine.
And if it sucks to be me how come you follow me around like a pet puppy pissing on yourself, you poor, jealous idiot?
Sad little man.
And now for your last word.....

We all know Loooooser is incompetent, but SPOAT is no better. Hint: you're not helping him, Pinata Boy..;;
Hmmmm....how to spend some of my new-found wealth! MASERATI GHIBLI!!!!!'
Eat your liver, SPOAT.

Weaving the Halperin news into a previous Halperin thread made sense. Sorry if the good natured “desperation” jab rubbed you the wrong way. You’ve got to admit it’s one of your favorite phrases here at the T&R Forum.