So what do folks think about this news?  Not that it is that shocking.  The silence is deafening - both from the left leaning women's rights folks (ie HRC and former FLOTUS to mention a couple), and this board.  Oh, that's right - he funded the democrats.

The left will come up with stupid, ignorant, irrelevant bullshit excuses to justify it all.

Sexual Predator - check
Misogynist - check
Racist - check
Income Inequality Enabler - check

He should be permanently ousted from his company and shunned as a pariah.  I wouldn't be surprised to see charges pressed.

One is a Hollywood business man, one is president of the United States!

Yes matt boy posting as I predicted.

someone who has been accused of the very same things Weinstein is being accused of. It seems that would make you the biggest tool of all! Well, perhaps not the biggest tool! That honor goes to Trump for being Putin's tool!

You can't make this up!!! The women movement, Ashy Judd who says she a "nasty woman" nasty is right, hahaha you had to blow that disgusting lizard looking like guy for a movie parts. And yet here you are talking about Donald Trump saying how he misogynistic. What about Hollywood begin the voice of women's rights, most of whom this guys seen and used.

good to see as usual Jake can be fair.  Wonder how Michelle feels about this?

Hillary who?

You are really, really good at beating a dead horse; much like Trump!

I would have thought only fat guy was stupid enough to fall into your trap....Guess I was wrong

Slick Willy either.  

I'm sure she's mortified.  Not that what she said 4 years ago when none of this was know has anything to do with anything.

I'm usually sober, as I was when I wrote that post and this one.  You are ALWAYS stupid.  And please excuse me if I haven't been following Weinstein's sexual predations the way you have.  Are you an afficionado of sexual molestation?

Let the record show (as it does above) that I was clearly aware of what's been said about Weinstein "for the last 48 hours." Why else would i have made my original post here?  Then you posted claiming his behavior has been known for a long time. Then you revert to the "48 hours" line.
Are you on crack?  Or do you lose your alleged mind over sexual abuse?  Oh, right, you have no mind to lose.  Or maybe some Republican grabbed your pussy when you were a girl.
Thanks for the laughs.

for regurgitating exactly what he said yesterday.  All you have done is upholster it in your usual flowery yet turgid word salad. How utterly predictable.
And now, just to complete the thought, here's a totally gratuitous image.

Your Honor my client is not the MAGA President, a suspended sentence would be fitting.  

Posted By: mattradd

Re: Yep! Truly shameful, and inexcusable behavior!
One is a Hollywood business man, one is president of the United States!  
   
 Perhaps that explains the lack of shock, and the silence!

So let take a closer look at the scumbag and chief again.
Trump and his cult followers, should really keep their own mouths closed!

-- Modified on 10/8/2017 1:39:06 PM

Here's what he wrote.  Exactly the same points as you labored to make in your long-winded, prolix, self-absorbed babble. This is what happens when you don't read the thread.
I didn't read the rest of your florid, over-written word vomit.
Please stop embarrassing yourself.  You'll have another accident.
Remember the last one?

Humm NPR, trying to take the conversation off topic about how hypocritical the left and democrats are? I don't wanna focus on what some woman claims about Trump. I wanna focus on the decades of sexual predator charges on Harvey Weinstein.  

...This (Harvey Weinstein) Type of character shows up along the entire gambit of political thought, this type of controlling behavior knows no political boundaries & when coupled with sexual (pussy grabbing) predilection creates an ugly atmosphere at any level.

So, the rumor is the hush money that was paid out was deducted from income before taxes and if so, this would be tax fraud................

I don't doubt that for a second, the issues are who sang such high praises for him (those D's who are the ones protecting women if you ask them), and who was pretty slow to condemn his actions...........

...I shouldn't post so subtly, today we find the (Harvey Weinstein)  type in Americas own White House & he likes to be called Mr. President.

-- Modified on 10/11/2017 6:25:06 PM

A lot of republicans are making the Weinstein news a political issue when it clearly is not.   The Demd are stupidly falling for it by backing away from Weinstein as though it is.  Weinstein is not and has never run for any public office.  Sure he donates, but that doesn’t make him “the face of the party” any more than David Dukes is the face of the GOP.  

You are wrong.  Politics enters it when the D's, including the Hollywood "elite", the great protector of women's rights, ignore what everyone has had a least some idea about, or at least those that did said nothing.  I give you 2013..........

The point is Jake, perhaps not in New York, but in La La land they knew...I linked this elsewhere, but just for you....

You lost all credibility when you posted anything from the NY Daily News.  

I am sure that there is more here than just sex (Psychology 101, showing off your power over others, etc.), but Weinstein could have enjoyed more hours of the best sex from the hottest women and saved millions of dollars if he had used TER.
.
Decriminalize! Let us relieve our natural sexual urges without fear of the law! Women in the workplace won't have to worry about being sexually harassed if co-workers and bosses are getting it elsewhere.

The actions of Trump are old news and one election ago.  The issue here is those who quickly (and rightfully so) called out Trump when his news broke, or called for gun controls quickly after the Vegas shooting for that matter, seemed to need to take 5 days to put their fingers up to see which way the political winds were blowing with regards to Mr Weinstein's transgressions.  And they being the self ordained protectors of women from those of the ilk we discuss here.

Sadly I think you have it right in that this was more about power than "hot sex".  And you are right, with his type of $ he could have enjoyed quite the (discreet) time with some incredibly beautiful women in LA.

Trump and his supporters better be careful on this subject.
So your puppet master has a history too.

I have a huge problem with the democrats because of this, especially Barack Obama. He had the perfect opportunity to push work ethic and personal responsibility in poor communities. To promote a hard work, sacrifice, bottem up and climb the barrel approach. Instead he promoted government programs, dependency and protests masked by community organization. Some things will never change, I guess.

So you believe former President Obama was a Income Inequality Enabler?
You keep showing, why you are blinded by your personal hate.
This is why you don't have any credibility yourself on here.

Barack Obama had plenty of opportunities to promote work in poor communities throughout America!!!!! And he didn't. HOPE and CHANGE!!!!!! BULL SHIT!!!!!!  

I will say it again about you.
So you are blinded by hate and not real facts.
Just like many people in the GOP.

Or by lefty snowflakes such as yourself that are so scared that the mere thought of Obama's legacy is going to be written on the back of a match book cover seeing as it will be pretty much nothing left and mostly irrelevant.

So staying in denial and lying to yourself, does not change real facts.

-- Modified on 10/13/2017 8:42:01 AM

You forgot to add that these.....