Soooo lefties on this board routinely blame Trump for every COVID death that ever happened.  Ok so here's my question?  and I am even going to give you all the benefits of hindsight how would you have done things differntly? Convince me that you could have done better than Trump?  

1) When I found out (as Trump did) in Feb. 2020 that Covid was mainly airborne and FAR more deadly than the flu I would have warned Americans, told them to wear masks, worn one myself, mobilized US industries to make more masks and other PPE.
2) I'd have mandated people maintain social distancing and urge them to listen to the CDC re indoor gatherings, etc.
3) Unlike Trump I would NOT have told Americans Covid would be gone in a few weeks.
There, that was easy. I just saving thousands of lives.

got a plan of action to save everyone? This is like a science fiction movie with a time machine you get to do a do-over.

is the one thing that Stump wasn't able to do; immediately put into action the Obama pandemic protocol playbook that was given to the Stump administration as part of their transitions.  Stump couldn't implement it because since it had Obama's name attached to it, he tossed it out almost immediately after taking office.  That plan would've included all the common sense measures previously mentioned, which would've put a big dent in COVID's potential impact on the country.

I wont blame Trump for EVERY death, but he is certainly at fault for many of them. Him telling us Covid was no big deal, at the same time telling Bob Woodward it was a serious and deadly disease, was the height of incompetence and malfeasance.

Which protected us from potential viruses.It gave us early detection. When trump closed that down, we lost our seat at the table and left us vulnerable. Hugh mistake.
Now, Lost what would you have done? Pretend it's no big deal or??? Sing "Ob-la-di, ob-la-da Life goes on"?

Everyone says that some form of lockdown / travel restrictions should have come sooner yes?

Asked the lefties what THEY would have done differently, and to make their argument coherent.  Instead, they all said what Trump did wrong instead of what they would have done differently.  It shows that you can't even get an honest answer from lefties who are stricken with TDS.  

In Wuhan China, if trump didn't fuck up sooooo bad....
Now, I know you and all of us are not physician-scientist,epidemiologist or immunologist. We don't know the logistic of what the federal gov can do or can't. So in essence your thread is just you showing your frustration and how everyone dumps on trumps. Yes we are picking on your guy because the buck stopped with him. I don't know what I would have done as I/ we don't have all the data to say what we could have done...
But what would you have done? Don't run and hide so give us your take...

Like you're the one doing the bitching since you felt you needed to mention the word "bitch" 16 times.  

You weren't bitching ( noun ) but you did post a bitching ( adjective) answer.

Saying what trump did wrong is another way to say what you would have done differently.  Your TDS    ( your mindless, unwavering devotion to this unqualified, unfit, lying demagogue, your inability to critically evaluate his words and actions, and your hate for those of us who are not part of your cult ) is obvious.  

Would have helped and made a difference. It wasn't too late it was just beginning.  Your inability to see that is disturbing. What is your obsession with 'doubling down' on all things Trump? It's a mental illness in and of itself.  It's your TDS I suppose.

Cuomo was telling New Yorkers to go out and party at clubs and they don't need no stinkin' masks.  Pelosi was in Chinatown in SF telling people to come on down, you don't need a mask.  I agree telling the truth from the start would have helped, but that includes the Dems, too.

That was very early on in the pandemic and may have been influenced by medical providers not having enough masks. Shortly after Fauci recommended general public masking to prevent the spread of the virus. The situation changes and medical knowledge evolves. Why do you have such a hard time with that simple truth? We have covered this subject many times in the past yet you continue to bring it up. Grow up. Smarten up. Or STFU.

AT the WH with Trump in the early days telling people to wear a mask and socially distance.  At that point, he was Trump's spokes-hole on all things Covid.  (We found out recently that he was in on the research in Wuhan to weaponize the virus, so he knew more than he let on.)  That's the same time frame that Cuomo and Pelosi were telling people you don't need a mask, and you should go to restaurants, go to bars, etc., to keep the economy going.

Wasn't in on the research in Wuhan to weaponize the virus. Another one of your many conspiracy theory fairy tails that you love to repeat ad nauseam.

SOURCE?

It means engineering the virus to make it more deadly, and Fauci knew the Chinese were conducting this research and it was funded by his Department.  Congress already has his emails that show he was aware of the research, which he denied in Congress.  GOP Congressman have referred him to the Justice Department for lying to Congress.

got a little bitch-love of your own going on.  Lol

Looking for anyone else's input as to how they would have stopped Coronavirus?

Here's what I would have done;

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1209646.shtml
Italy potentially had COVID-19 outbreak 'earlier than Wuhan', study shows
.
"There is a series of evidence on coronavirus being found in Italy before December 2019, including the latest regarding a 4-year-old boy found to have contracted the virus in November 2019, which some experts believe indicates that a COVID-19 outbreak occurred in Italy earlier than in China's Wuhan, which recorded the earliest COVID-19 symptoms from a patient  on December 8, 2019 and has since been labeled as the origin of the virus by some Western countries. ..."
.
The samples and swabs taken from patients with an unusual respiratory disease in Italy in Nov - Dec 2019 were only confirmed to be Covid-19 months later, after the genetic tests became available.  
.
Trump's China travel ban was too little, too late. As implemented, it was totally porous with many exceptions to allow entry. Over 40,000 people entered the US from China in the early days of the travel "ban".  Experts who knew about the Milan, Italy outbreak had recommended shutting down entry from Europe but Trump didn't want to piss off non-Chinese countries.   Trump eventually banned some EU travel weeks later, once again, too little, too late, with a lot of porosity for thousands of travelers coming to the US.
.
The thing is, Trump received security briefs in January about the extraordinary danger of Covid-19. As he explained to Woodward, he downplayed it because he didn't want to cause a panic.  
.
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-told-bob-woodward-he-knew-february-covid-19-was-n1239658
"Woodward details that Trump was briefed on the virus in January.  "This is deadly stuff," Trump told Woodward in a Feb. 7 phone call.  “You just breathe the air and that’s how it’s passed,” Trump told Woodward, according to The Post. “And so that’s a very tricky one. That’s a very delicate one. It’s also more deadly than even your strenuous flu.”
.
"The book says Trump was given dire warnings in January about the virus that would lead to a worldwide pandemic in March."

in reality, a panic is what really needed to happen.  I'm referring to a "controlled panic", where a normal POTUS would calmly inform the nation of the issue, provide constant information on its progress, & give guidance (via scientists & medical professionals) on protective & preventive measures that should be implemented.  People would've been more on board with protecting themselves & others.  The problem was Stump refused to inform the country on the urgency of COVID & what it might do if nothing was done.  He also chose to put a gag order on the scientific & medical communities, instead choosing to advocate instead for Lysol IVs & tanning bulb suppositories.  The results of those decisions speak for themselves.

There was no claim that Covid originated in Italy. The evidence is that Covid had already appeared (spread to) Italy in Nov 2019.

Your link to Fox "News" (below) does not support what you are saying here.  
.
The earliest case mentioned in the article is in November 2019, not Sep and not Oct:
"The U.S. State Department on Friday night said it had "reason to believe" scientists in Wuhan, China, may have been infected with the coronavirus in the autumn of 2019 ..." Nov is still autumn. "In March, the South China Morning Post said that the first person infected with the disease may have caught it on Nov. 17, 2019. ..." Nov 17 is from China sources, not the US State Dept.
.
"In a statement, the agency indicated it thinks several researchers inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology had symptoms consistent with COVID-19 and ****other seasonal illnesses.**** ..."  Without testing, we don't know what diseases they had in Sep, Oct, Nov.  China probably did testing of samples from Sep, Oct, Nov months later but they aren't telling anybody what the tests revealed.
.
"China has firmly rejected calls for an independent outside investigation." China should relent and allow a free and independent investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV2.