OP is suggesting: assume the room is 100
She sets a rate on the assumption of 100 for the room + 200 for her = 300.
If a duo and they BOTH get (100 + 200) x 2 = 600 then the extra 100 isn't going to the hotel, it's going to them, above their normal profit of 200 for solo sessions.
If the duo wants to, they can adjust the total to reflect the shared room: 100 + (200 x 2) = 500 total. The hotel gets their 100 and each girl still gets her 200 above costs.
Having said that, when girls are out working, they sometimes take separate rooms anyway, so they can work solo on their own schedule w/o having to have conflicts with their friend's schedule.
In this case, their rates might be: assume 100 for the room, in order to make the money I want to make, I have to see at least 4 guys that day, etc., etc. In THAT case, the duo session still has to cover her room cost, even tho' only one of the two rooms is being used.
I see the OP's point but I can see it working both ways. Because I am on the client side, I think there should be a discount for a duo: shared room cost, less work, ... but I don't call those shots.
My duo experience was fun but not worth it. Some double BBBJ but the rest was tag-team and too strenuous trying to be nice all around even tho' I wanted to give more attention to one than the other. I might do it again, but only I knew it was going to porno quality.
Posted By: ontheprowl14
Just wondering if seeing two ladies at the same hotel incall (as doubles) could, in some cases, be more cost effective than seeing them individually considering the hotel savings? I've never noticed this in doubles ads, but I'm curious about the experiences of others.