It has always been social time followed by private time for me. I’ve never split the date into three parts, not because I’m against it but because the natural flow of the dinner date has never steered for that direction. Usually dinners take about 1.5 or 2 hours depending on the restaurant and such, and 2-2.5 hours in the room is an ideal playtime for me.
However I have a ten hour daytime escapade option that was once split into four parts, the fourth part being a threesome
Question for providers: When making multi hr (eg 4hr) date with outdoor time such as 2hr dinner/lunch. From a provider's perspective, is it appropriate to suggest 1 hr private time, follow by 2hr dinner/lunch, then another 1hr private time? Or would you preferred to do outdoor activity first, then a contiguous 2hr indoor? Or you really dont care.
I'll just chime in and say that what you suggest is not unusual at all, and is SOP with a few of the gals whom I see.
Just don't eat too heavily if you want to enjoy your dessert back up in the room.
4 hours date with a dinner, wine tasting, play time, tasting more wine... what a delightful date!
If that means what I think it means, that's a most interesting metaphor.
...fun playtime before the dinner. They find playtime on a full stomach not ideal. Some have said they don't mind either way. I can't recall any preferring food before playtime.
Thats a good point re: playing with full stomach.
I wasn't even thinking about that. I was thinking about the hassles (fixing makeup, hair,...) for the lady to go through to get ready if we are to go outdoor to dine in middle of the date. Hopefully I get more input from the ladies.
-- Modified on 5/5/2018 10:53:03 AM
Everyone is diffrent. Some prefer the public time before the private time. Some prefer the private time before the public time. Some are fine with a before and after. Many will just go along with what you want. It's your date and you are paying for it. The best thing is to ask the individual you want to see. Trying to get a consensus here on something so variable, is not really possible.
as there are so many different variables... ask the lady! throw out a couple of options for her -and as a professional . she should be good at communicating what is most comfortable for her.. We all have our own preferences...
Everyone is diffrent. Some prefer the public time before the private time. Some prefer the private time before the public time. Some are fine with a before and after. Many will just go along with what you want. It's your date and you are paying for it. The best thing is to ask the individual you want to see. Trying to get a consensus here on something so variable, is not really possible.
2hrs private time then 2hrs lunch dinner but i've also done 1hr private followed by 2hrs lunch/dinner and ending with 1hr more private time.
Don't have a huge preference of doing it one way over the other.
Question for providers: When making multi hr (eg 4hr) date with outdoor time such as 2hr dinner/lunch. From a provider's perspective, is it appropriate to suggest 1 hr private time, follow by 2hr dinner/lunch, then another 1hr private time? Or would you preferred to do outdoor activity first, then a contiguous 2hr indoor? Or you really dont care.
Jseeker,
If I may. I pretty well only do multiple hour dates, dinner dates, overnights, and travel dates.
Let me tell you there is no right or wrong answer. Whatever works for you and your provider. Personally, I like the build up. A place where we can meet for dinner or drink. I like the seduction over drinks or dinner. Then after I want her to suggest we go to my suite. I never force myself on a provider. I want them into the moment. I put a lot of thought and effort into my events. For me, it is so much more than the sex. It is the build-up, the romance I try to create. It is getting my provider to say "Wow best date ever!" If I cannot get that I tend to get disappointed.
Yes I know I pay and yes some just say it so they can get more out of me but it is fun none the less. It makes me feel special when I make them fell special. Crazy I know but to each his own.
To each his own. If you email me at [email protected] I might share a few examples with you.
Enjoy!
Dickson
It has always been social time followed by private time for me. I’ve never split the date into three parts, not because I’m against it but because the natural flow of the dinner date has never steered for that direction. Usually dinners take about 1.5 or 2 hours depending on the restaurant and such, and 2-2.5 hours in the room is an ideal playtime for me.
However I have a ten hour daytime escapade option that was once split into four parts, the fourth part being a threesome
I am like you in the fact I normally like the natural flow of a dinner date, but the idea of a play/eat,drink/play again is rather appealing to me in large part because at my "advanced age" i need a little longer recovery time than I once did. I like the idea of playing first, enjoying a nice dinner, which gives me PLENTY of time to recover and then some more play time after I have fully recharged.
I have to confess, I don't know if I could truly appreciate a threesome at the end of a ten hour date, but it does sound fun.
I recommend you play first....clean up and then go out to eat.....then come back and play all over again. Never on a full stomach either or you will be too full to play. That’s what I do on multi hour date. The two hours away over dinner gives you time to re-charge your batteries too.
My multi-hours with activities requested outside of private time go like this: meet at initial location and have some fun for an hour or two, go to lunch or dinner, and come back for more fun. I have also had it go where there is private time for the first few hours and then lunch or dinner.
It really can go almost anyway you want it to within your allotted time and sometimes a little bit of OTC time may be included (depending on schedule constraints) for a meeting that long.
Hope this helps!
Haha, you are cute! Yes, OTC time. Again, it depends on schedule constraints and compatibility which, as you know, goes both ways. If I think they are obnoxious, inappropriate, etc. I would not go out in public with them in the first place.
I don't do OTC time with obnoxious and inappropriate escorts either.
Oh who am I kidding? They are the ONLY ones I like to spend OTC time with. lol
You are too funny
As a Provider whom regularly enjoys extended dates...my two cents
on a four-hour date:
Since we're both already showered and coiffured, it just makes more
time-efficient sense to have a two-hour dining/flirting/romancing/
and/or an outdoor engagement prior. Thereafter, a two-hour sexy
"private" time ensues to release the excitement already built.
Then one showers and off you go with a sly smile, making everyone
wonder what you've been up to for the last four hours!
I prefer to save the fireworks until we get back from dinner!
Steph XO
I don't mind either option and I'll ask which way a gentleman prefers to split it.
Yes, it's nice being perfectly made-up for a 2/2 split playtime then public time. But there's also something SO hot about being more yourselves and letting your guard down just a bit if you split it up with the public time in the middle! Plus depending on a gentleman's rebound time, splitting it up is much better for some guys - and it's less stressful
Callie