Question for providers: When making multi hr (eg 4hr) date with outdoor time such as 2hr dinner/lunch.  From a provider's perspective, is it appropriate to suggest 1 hr private time, follow by 2hr dinner/lunch, then another 1hr private time?  Or would you preferred to do outdoor activity first, then a contiguous 2hr indoor? Or you really dont care.

I'll just chime in and say that what you suggest is not unusual at all, and is SOP with a few of the gals whom I see.

4 hours date with a dinner, wine tasting, play time, tasting more wine... what a delightful date!

If that means what I think it means, that's a most interesting metaphor.

...fun playtime before the dinner. They find playtime on a full stomach not ideal. Some have said they don't mind either way. I can't recall any preferring food before playtime.

Thats a good point re: playing with full stomach.  
I wasn't even thinking about that.  I was thinking about the hassles (fixing makeup, hair,...) for the lady to go through to get ready if we are to go outdoor to dine in middle of the date.   Hopefully I get more input from the ladies.

-- Modified on 5/5/2018 10:53:03 AM

Everyone is diffrent. Some prefer the public time before the private time. Some prefer the private time before the public time. Some are fine with a before and after. Many will just go along with what you want. It's your date and you are paying for it. The best thing is to ask the individual you want to see. Trying to get a consensus here on something so variable, is not really possible.

as there are so many different variables... ask the lady!   throw out a couple of options for her -and as a professional . she should be good at communicating what is most comfortable for her..   We all have our own preferences...

2hrs private time then 2hrs lunch dinner but i've also done 1hr private followed by 2hrs lunch/dinner and ending with 1hr more private time.  
Don't have a huge preference of doing it one way over the other.

Jseeker,  

It has always been social time followed by private time for me. I’ve never split the date into three parts, not because I’m against it but because the natural flow of the dinner date has never steered for that direction. Usually dinners take about 1.5 or 2 hours depending on the restaurant and such, and 2-2.5 hours in the room is an ideal playtime for me.

I am like you in the fact I normally like the natural flow of a dinner date, but the idea of a play/eat,drink/play again is rather appealing to me in large part because at my "advanced age" i need a little longer recovery time than I once did.  I like the idea of playing first, enjoying a nice dinner, which gives me PLENTY of time to recover and then some more play time after I have fully recharged.  

I recommend you play first....clean up and then go out to eat.....then come back and play all over again. Never on a full stomach either or you will be too full to play. That’s what I do on multi hour date. The two hours away over dinner gives you time to re-charge your batteries too.

My multi-hours with activities requested outside of private time go like this: meet at initial location and have some fun for an hour or two, go to lunch or dinner, and come back for more fun. I have also had it go where there is private time for the first few hours and then lunch or dinner.  

You had me at hello!

Haha, you are cute! Yes, OTC time. Again, it depends on schedule constraints and compatibility which, as you know, goes both ways. If I think they are obnoxious, inappropriate, etc. I would not go out in public with them in the first place.

I don't do OTC time with obnoxious and inappropriate escorts either.

As a Provider whom regularly enjoys extended dates...my two cents
on a four-hour date:

You are too funny

I prefer to save the fireworks until we get back from dinner!

I don't mind either option and I'll ask which way a gentleman prefers to split it.