New York

Re:Hey Thirsty question!!!!!!!!!
thirsty 2 Reviews 3139 reads
posted
1 / 40

If you have specific issues, please post them here so that Staff doesn't miss anything. Please cite examples. The site sucks is a bit too general. ;)

thirsty

Kornlover 22 Reviews 2994 reads
posted
2 / 40

Although I think the site is easier to navigate and will be easier to read after I get more accustomed to it, I have some specific problems:

1. The contrast is not sufficient so that it is very hard to read compared to the old site.

2 The print seems to be smaller.   Perhaps that is just a problem with my 60+ year old eyes, but I certainly didn't have any problem before

3. It is difficult to read posts because there is insufficient demarcation of where the post begins and ends.

BILL18356 2439 reads
posted
3 / 40

Only one issue , I'm still being moderated and for the life of me I dont know why.

thirsty 2 Reviews 2103 reads
posted
4 / 40

You're not really helping your case by posting off-topic. ;)

I searched the board for your username back 365 days. You've only been posting here for a week.

thirsty

Liya 3098 reads
posted
5 / 40

that has the wrong page showing up after i post.  saying 'it may take up to a day..." for my message to appear when they are going through immediately.

-------------------------------------------------
edited from this message:
okay, i am *suddenly* being moderated on the national board. up until the change over i had been unmoderated for awhile.

-- Modified on 4/3/2005 7:30:48 PM

CYNIC 3270 reads
posted
6 / 40

on the new site puts undue strain on them.  I've been forced to constantly go back to the "classic" site if I'm reading reviews or the discussion boards for more than about 5 minutes.

My only other complaint is about this message site that I'm on right now.  It's too small.  One has to do a lot of scrolling to read the message before posting if it's longer than a sentence or two.

But it's the small font that is the major problem to me.  It's really causing me a problem.

-- Modified on 4/4/2005 12:53:57 PM

Liya 2634 reads
posted
7 / 40

ctrl up arrow key ? or some very simple shortcut  i can't tell you exactly what it is because i have a mac.  but, try looking under view or preferences on your menu bar.  you can control the size of your text on your own and if you hate the colors you can override the colors also under preferences.

thirsty 2 Reviews 3651 reads
posted
8 / 40

The same thing happened to me once and I know that I didn't moderate myself. ;)

thirsty

thirsty 2 Reviews 2971 reads
posted
9 / 40

I think those adjustments would be applied to all sites that you visit. Then the fonts on other sites may appear too big.

thirsty

nceguy07 22 Reviews 2070 reads
posted
10 / 40

I mainly have an issue with the scolling I have to do to see all of the text on the message boards. The menus on the left side should be across the top, that would even out the board. And maybe a darker color font would make the text easier to read.

Just my 2 bits...

Ng

stpenn 4262 reads
posted
12 / 40
BobbyTZ 3325 reads
posted
13 / 40

So, you can't tell which posts you read.  Also, you can't tell which reviews you've read.  Or maybe it's just me.

2sense 3610 reads
posted
14 / 40

As raised by many in this community, a major problem with the "new Coke" site is the the necessity for horizontal scrolling to see all the text. On the old site, you can make the column whatever width you want, yet still read the entire text without horizontal scrolling. The text retains the same font size, and just reformats (left justified). If your eyesight is not the best, you can just make it a more narrow width.

This comes from Typesetting 101 (see below website):

"...Text Block Size

Blocks of text should not be too long or too wide.

When paragraphs get long, they're harder to read because there's less whitespace. Whitespace gives paragraphs shape, which acts like visual bearings, making it easier to find your place, and to find the start of the next line. Using more, smaller paragraphs suits web content particularly, becuase it lets you subtly highlight more useful phrases, by putting them in their own paragraph, or starting a new paragraph.

For similar reasons, long lines (wide paragraphs) are slower and harder to read than narrower ones. Lines of around 100 characters present neat bite-size chunks of text that can easily be decoded, and also make it really easy to scan round to the start of the next line. That's why newspapers and magazines use several columns on a page, and why books use the same common format...."  

As far as a I can tell, this is done almost automatically on the old "classic coke" site, but it not possible on the "new coke" site.

This is an example of two-steps forward, one-step back. Since this was allowed on the original site, and indeed uses principles that go back to Herr Guttenberg, I am needless to say disappointed in Staff.

By the way, this problem could be fixed, and I would still use only the old site format.

ohioangel See my TER Reviews 4081 reads
posted
16 / 40
NY Vanessa 2476 reads
posted
17 / 40

Sorry, couldn't resist :O)

I am sure this has been said already but I will say it for myself...

The font really is too small, and the light blue text is being drowned out with the white background.

I think the blue text should either be changed, or made bolder. And the text size has to be increased at least by 2 or 3 points.

The site in general looks very "2005" but reading it is a pain in the...eyes..

Liya 2793 reads
posted
18 / 40

so it's easy enough to adjust for each place you visit. copied and pasted from another site....  
__________________________________________________________

......: under Netscape 6 or 7 or Mozilla 1, simply type:


Ctrl/+


to increase the font size, and


Ctrl/-


to decrease it.


Under Netscape 4, simply type:


Ctrl/]


to increase the font size, and


Ctrl/[


to decrease it.

----------

for microsoft internet explorer go to VIEW under the menu, then the subheading TEXT SIZE and go to larger or largest.

Liya 4476 reads
posted
19 / 40
CYNIC 3241 reads
posted
20 / 40

The font remains too small for the body of the post I'm looking at, as well as all other headlines.  I've mentioned this on other posts, and so have others.

Liya 3198 reads
posted
21 / 40

for me.  override the preferences or keep increasing the font until they all increase.

Liya 2871 reads
posted
22 / 40

look at the sidebar in grey/green for an example.  but, white backgrounds generally make things harder to read.  if this board was given a gray background it would probably become easier on the eyes.

houndog 231 Reviews 3742 reads
posted
23 / 40

Thirsty -  I have no idea how to access the VIP information....how to change information or monitor how many days I have left as VIP.  This new board is really a negative move by ER.

thirsty 2 Reviews 2943 reads
posted
24 / 40

Good idea! I was just trying to consolidate the comments so I could send Staff the link.

thirsty

bellaco 12 Reviews 2863 reads
posted
25 / 40

Santino and hounddog stole my thunder, but there's also the issue of speed.

Noah Webster 3291 reads
posted
26 / 40
CYNIC 2284 reads
posted
27 / 40

Or a green backgound for that matter.  And blue on grey is not a good color combo for reading.

-- Modified on 4/4/2005 8:33:01 AM

CYNIC 3469 reads
posted
28 / 40

I ALWAYS have my font size on LARGEST.  It doesn't do what you think it does!

It may work for you, but if you've been reading all these posts on the subject, it doesn't work for many others.

-- Modified on 4/4/2005 8:24:21 AM

BoredInCT 2527 reads
posted
29 / 40

I used to use "View All" to see long threads. Now, View All doesn't work on long threads. The hour glass appears and nothing happens.

However, I have to say that it is a welcome improvement to not have the top ads in a frame. It means I can read the site from work -- I can scroll down a page without worrying that someone will walk in and notice the topless girl on my screen. Before, you couldn't scroll away that top ad.

gusty 55 2694 reads
posted
30 / 40

I switched to Firefox specifically because it makes it much easier to read the many websites that have type as small as TER now has. You use hit Ctrl-+ to make it bigger (2 or 3 times) and Ctrl-- to make it small again.

I realize that it may seem like a lot of trouble to switch browsers just because this site re-designed, but if you have trouble reading the text here, you will probably have trouble with a lot of sites that use small fonts.

And with Firefox, all of the text -- headlines and the message -- get larger or smaller with Ctrl-+

Excepting the graphics -- which are the buttons at the bottom. But once you squint and figure out what they say, you don't need them bigger.

houndog 231 Reviews 2182 reads
posted
31 / 40

Agreed.  We hobbyists do not have time to spend the whole day checking reviews.  The usefulness of this site is for us to be able to quickly check reviews....make assessments, and then act on our judgement.  To have to wait endless seconds between changes in the screen, or review searches is a huge NEGATIVE and makes me want to forget about ER, if I had a viable alternative !

SS344 5 Reviews 3914 reads
posted
32 / 40


 this? Ever since the new format went into effect, everytime I PM someone, I get all this [10] [13] shit! I've cut and pasted an example for you below. What's up with this? :


  I spoke to (deleted) about the last week of April; she said no problem. [13][10][13][10]She needs to verify you. So when you get a chance email her from her website.[13][10][13][10] (deleted)

butt-one 4017 reads
posted
33 / 40

When i use Yahoo i get the new site & Aol I get the old one I know u have alot of bullshit going on right now When u get chance give a shout Thanks  Frankie2003 where the fu*k r u  when i need U LOL

stpenn 3414 reads
posted
34 / 40
stpenn 2606 reads
posted
35 / 40

But not really on Microsoft Internet Explorer (for Windows) as the font size increase is tiny.  If you have Firefox, Opera or Mozilla browsers the text zooming is significant.

Firefox and Mozilla browsers are free.

thirsty 2 Reviews 2923 reads
posted
36 / 40

I got that a few times even before the new site went online. For some reason, I assumed it was an AOL problem. I will pass it on to Staff.

thirsty

thirsty 2 Reviews 1892 reads
posted
37 / 40
jc48757 2 Reviews 3687 reads
posted
38 / 40

yes, color and contrast of text definitely a big problem. distinguishing separation of sections in review also difficult.

existing problems/suggestions: 1) site much too slow these last couple of months. i don't know what was done to make it that way, but it was something, for sure, and it's not just me or my computer, or my access.
2) 'exclude bad websites' during search facility....leave it blank and let us decide whether or not it should be part of the search criteria. it's very bothersome having to continuously exclude it.
3) hitting the 'back' function while inside a discussion thread often brings me back to the 'top' of the discussion items, instead of the section of the page where I entered the item. very, very annoying.

thirsty 2 Reviews 3346 reads
posted
39 / 40

Yes...it takes forever to go through the message queues...I had to give up last night. Other issues such as 3 pages of messages to approve and not able to get to page 3. Staff is aware.

thirsty

SS344 5 Reviews 2500 reads
posted
40 / 40



 What an asshole I am! Please delete all those multiply posts I had on the last thread! Thanks!

Register Now!