So, you can't tell which posts you read. Also, you can't tell which reviews you've read. Or maybe it's just me.
If you have specific issues, please post them here so that Staff doesn't miss anything. Please cite examples. The site sucks is a bit too general. 
thirsty
Although I think the site is easier to navigate and will be easier to read after I get more accustomed to it, I have some specific problems:
1. The contrast is not sufficient so that it is very hard to read compared to the old site.
2 The print seems to be smaller. Perhaps that is just a problem with my 60+ year old eyes, but I certainly didn't have any problem before
3. It is difficult to read posts because there is insufficient demarcation of where the post begins and ends.
look at the sidebar in grey/green for an example. but, white backgrounds generally make things harder to read. if this board was given a gray background it would probably become easier on the eyes.
Or a green backgound for that matter. And blue on grey is not a good color combo for reading.
-- Modified on 4/4/2005 8:33:01 AM
Only one issue , I'm still being moderated and for the life of me I dont know why.
You're not really helping your case by posting off-topic.
I searched the board for your username back 365 days. You've only been posting here for a week.
thirsty
that has the wrong page showing up after i post. saying 'it may take up to a day..." for my message to appear when they are going through immediately.
-------------------------------------------------
edited from this message:
okay, i am *suddenly* being moderated on the national board. up until the change over i had been unmoderated for awhile.
-- Modified on 4/3/2005 7:30:48 PM
The same thing happened to me once and I know that I didn't moderate myself.
thirsty
it's happening to me all the time now.
What an asshole I am! Please delete all those multiply posts I had on the last thread! Thanks!
on the new site puts undue strain on them. I've been forced to constantly go back to the "classic" site if I'm reading reviews or the discussion boards for more than about 5 minutes.
My only other complaint is about this message site that I'm on right now. It's too small. One has to do a lot of scrolling to read the message before posting if it's longer than a sentence or two.
But it's the small font that is the major problem to me. It's really causing me a problem.
-- Modified on 4/4/2005 12:53:57 PM
ctrl up arrow key ? or some very simple shortcut i can't tell you exactly what it is because i have a mac. but, try looking under view or preferences on your menu bar. you can control the size of your text on your own and if you hate the colors you can override the colors also under preferences.
I think those adjustments would be applied to all sites that you visit. Then the fonts on other sites may appear too big.
thirsty
so it's easy enough to adjust for each place you visit. copied and pasted from another site....
__________________________________________________________
......: under Netscape 6 or 7 or Mozilla 1, simply type:
Ctrl/+
to increase the font size, and
Ctrl/-
to decrease it.
Under Netscape 4, simply type:
Ctrl/]
to increase the font size, and
Ctrl/[
to decrease it.
----------
for microsoft internet explorer go to VIEW under the menu, then the subheading TEXT SIZE and go to larger or largest.
The font remains too small for the body of the post I'm looking at, as well as all other headlines. I've mentioned this on other posts, and so have others.
for me. override the preferences or keep increasing the font until they all increase.
I ALWAYS have my font size on LARGEST. It doesn't do what you think it does!
It may work for you, but if you've been reading all these posts on the subject, it doesn't work for many others.
-- Modified on 4/4/2005 8:24:21 AM
I switched to Firefox specifically because it makes it much easier to read the many websites that have type as small as TER now has. You use hit Ctrl-+ to make it bigger (2 or 3 times) and Ctrl-- to make it small again.
I realize that it may seem like a lot of trouble to switch browsers just because this site re-designed, but if you have trouble reading the text here, you will probably have trouble with a lot of sites that use small fonts.
And with Firefox, all of the text -- headlines and the message -- get larger or smaller with Ctrl-+
Excepting the graphics -- which are the buttons at the bottom. But once you squint and figure out what they say, you don't need them bigger.
But not really on Microsoft Internet Explorer (for Windows) as the font size increase is tiny. If you have Firefox, Opera or Mozilla browsers the text zooming is significant.
Firefox and Mozilla browsers are free.
I mainly have an issue with the scolling I have to do to see all of the text on the message boards. The menus on the left side should be across the top, that would even out the board. And maybe a darker color font would make the text easier to read.
Just my 2 bits...
Ng
So, you can't tell which posts you read. Also, you can't tell which reviews you've read. Or maybe it's just me.
Yes...it takes forever to go through the message queues...I had to give up last night. Other issues such as 3 pages of messages to approve and not able to get to page 3. Staff is aware.
thirsty
As raised by many in this community, a major problem with the "new Coke" site is the the necessity for horizontal scrolling to see all the text. On the old site, you can make the column whatever width you want, yet still read the entire text without horizontal scrolling. The text retains the same font size, and just reformats (left justified). If your eyesight is not the best, you can just make it a more narrow width.
This comes from Typesetting 101 (see below website):
"...Text Block Size
Blocks of text should not be too long or too wide.
When paragraphs get long, they're harder to read because there's less whitespace. Whitespace gives paragraphs shape, which acts like visual bearings, making it easier to find your place, and to find the start of the next line. Using more, smaller paragraphs suits web content particularly, becuase it lets you subtly highlight more useful phrases, by putting them in their own paragraph, or starting a new paragraph.
For similar reasons, long lines (wide paragraphs) are slower and harder to read than narrower ones. Lines of around 100 characters present neat bite-size chunks of text that can easily be decoded, and also make it really easy to scan round to the start of the next line. That's why newspapers and magazines use several columns on a page, and why books use the same common format...."
As far as a I can tell, this is done almost automatically on the old "classic coke" site, but it not possible on the "new coke" site.
This is an example of two-steps forward, one-step back. Since this was allowed on the original site, and indeed uses principles that go back to Herr Guttenberg, I am needless to say disappointed in Staff.
By the way, this problem could be fixed, and I would still use only the old site format.
Good idea! I was just trying to consolidate the comments so I could send Staff the link.
thirsty
Sorry, couldn't resist 
I am sure this has been said already but I will say it for myself...
The font really is too small, and the light blue text is being drowned out with the white background.
I think the blue text should either be changed, or made bolder. And the text size has to be increased at least by 2 or 3 points.
The site in general looks very "2005" but reading it is a pain in the...eyes..
Thirsty - I have no idea how to access the VIP information....how to change information or monitor how many days I have left as VIP. This new board is really a negative move by ER.
Santino and hounddog stole my thunder, but there's also the issue of speed.
this? Ever since the new format went into effect, everytime I PM someone, I get all this [10] [13] shit! I've cut and pasted an example for you below. What's up with this? :
I spoke to (deleted) about the last week of April; she said no problem. [13][10][13][10]She needs to verify you. So when you get a chance email her from her website.[13][10][13][10] (deleted)
When i use Yahoo i get the new site & Aol I get the old one I know u have alot of bullshit going on right now When u get chance give a shout Thanks Frankie2003 where the fu*k r u when i need U LOL
I'll pass it on.
thirsty
I got that a few times even before the new site went online. For some reason, I assumed it was an AOL problem. I will pass it on to Staff.
thirsty
yes, color and contrast of text definitely a big problem. distinguishing separation of sections in review also difficult.
existing problems/suggestions: 1) site much too slow these last couple of months. i don't know what was done to make it that way, but it was something, for sure, and it's not just me or my computer, or my access.
2) 'exclude bad websites' during search facility....leave it blank and let us decide whether or not it should be part of the search criteria. it's very bothersome having to continuously exclude it.
3) hitting the 'back' function while inside a discussion thread often brings me back to the 'top' of the discussion items, instead of the section of the page where I entered the item. very, very annoying.