First off. Every provider has the right to see whomever she wants. This is a voluntary business and nobody is compelled to see anyone. Incidentally that goes both ways.

if anyone understands this post please fill me in cuz i am lost and maybe it stems back to an old thread ....but?       WADZILLA please help !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fjcJp_Nwv

A provider refused to see him based on his reviews.     I am pretty sure hobbyists refuse to see ladies based on her reviews so turnaround is fair play, IMO

I'm not VIP but it's not difficult to come to conclusions based upon his latest review introduction.  

Well if that is the case the provider in question made a HUGE mistake telling him why she is refusing him. This is all too common among ladies.  

I didn't say you Belinda. It was a general statement.

I agree with you though.  We should not say why we are turning a hobbyist down.  
It creates too many problems and bad feelings, IMO.

-- Modified on 1/26/2015 7:40:23 PM

Get an eye exam... and if needed, update your corrective lenses, or get some if you don't have any.  That should help you distinguish between photos that are in fact of a given provider, and those that aren't.  

despite giving a provider high scores,  he referred to her as "chubby, but in a very good way" in a recent review.  That (perhaps) unfortunate choice of adjective makes a little more sense given english isn't his first language.  Either way, the overall review was good and wouldn't deter me from seeing the provider.

I want to touch on just one point the OP made (about giving true information) and I agree with it wholeheartedly.

Although I have not yet reviewed Jenessa Skye I have received two massages from her over the past month and all I can say is that she is a perfect 10! .. I am sorry dude there is NO chub on the girl and further more the pics could not be more accurate For what it is worth!  

I naturally thought about "that" review as well but then the OP's post did not make sense. I looked at some of his other reviews for the answer...don't know for sure but the timeline and taking everything into account made sense to me. Just my guess...

Genesis only uses real photos!  Why would you suggest otherwise?  If you think they are fake, by all means, show us the links to the real ones, so we know.  Wadzilla would be a good one to ask, because he is a picture finding genius.  I have met Jenessa, and she has ZERO reasons to use fake photos.  To say those things and say that you would repeat?  I'm a bit baffled by your confusion.  Saying she is larger is one thing, because it is honestly YOUR opinion.  However, to say anything about fake photos is just erroneous.  Please prove me wrong or recant.

JENESSA, not GENESIS  ;-/

Trinity, I had.no clue what Genessis (sp?) was...but I agree, effin' autocorrect lol.

Recently, I've seen  people complain about "overrating" of providers, now we have someone who "underrates".   I guess I see it this way.  The providers have ads, some show faces, some show bodies, some show both and some show neither.  I'm only going to see providers who interest me from their ads (including photos) and am therefore likely to rate them highly.  I saw them, I picked them for a reason.  Now, if I show up and it's not her nor a fair representation of her, then we may have issues.  For the most part, the ads are correct and should be viewed like any other ad where assets are highlighted, etc.   Some say come see me at this low rate - "What a bargain!".  Others stand on their own merit and demand a higher price.   We should have an idea of what we're getting into before contacting a provider.  Once, I've done my ad homework, then it's time for review homework, but that's secondary.

People may well be jumping to conclusions here.  And even if they are correct, the review reads as a positive one to me.

I was curious when you mentioned his low scores so I looked at his 20+ reviews, just the #s.  
Yes he does have some very low scores lol but...

Posted By: kasper_woods

Recently, I've seen  people complain about "overrating" of providers, now we have someone who "underrates".   I guess I see it this way.  The providers have ads, some show faces, some show bodies, some show both and some show neither.  I'm only going to see providers who interest me from their ads (including photos) and am therefore likely to rate them highly.  I saw them, I picked them for a reason.  Now, if I show up and it's not her nor a fair representation of her, then we may have issues.  For the most part, the ads are correct and should be viewed like any other ad where assets are highlighted, etc.   Some say come see me at this low rate - "What a bargain!".  Others stand on their own merit and demand a higher price.   We should have an idea of what we're getting into before contacting a provider.  Once, I've done my ad homework, then it's time for review homework, but that's secondary.  
   
 It feels like some people (not outing Langeweile), look at the ads, decide to see someone then tear them down, when they/we are the ones making the decision to contact.   The providers have a choice, but the choice starts with us.  I don't have any providers banging down my doors to pay to see me.  I'm the one starting the process.    
   
 I guess I'm saying that I expect the ratings to be over-inflated to a point.    
   
 BTW to respond LChayse, IMHO - It's not an issue of giving out TER IDs.  I'm sure most of the women I've reviewed know my ID from what my review said.    
   
 I give kudos to Langeweile for the honesty (and not using an alias), but we still should look for people who peak our interest and rate fairly based on personal experience.    
   
 Other than low scores, Langeweile's reviews don't seem to be overly harsh, but I wouldn't blame someone for not wanting to go into a situation where most of the time the scores are low.

http://www.hark.com/clips/nbdxfkjqxy-hickory-dickory-dock

Well though out and said Kasper.

The one thing you do is not to call a very highly rated girl is "chubby" as there is bound to be harsh feedback on it. This came up I think in early fall where a client called a well reviewed massage provider bigger than he would have liked and yah it got brought up here on the board too and she was not too happy. As for the picture thing I am not saying they are her or not her but on her newest ad there is a newer picture that is not like the others and that is probably what he is talking about.  She is stunning and I would love to see her sometime and making it known to the girl that you were "dissapointed" in some of her looks is not the best thing to do, especially when she knows your doing it.

A gentleman doesn't disparage a woman's character, e.g. saying she is deceitful in her advertising, without REAL good evidence.  

Just let the providers review us too, we can take it , ha

Clearly 3 out of Jenessa's 4 pics on BP are not her. Unless some of them are very old pictures.  

I received two pm's confirming that all of Jenessa's pictures on BP are hers. I believe it and I have to admit I was wrong.
But to be clear my visit with her wasn't what prompted my rant. She is a great lady. The word chubby was used in a playful way, especially since she told me that she was trying to lose some weight. I apologize if the word chubby was taken in an offensive way.
Moderator guy had me actually take down the performance score by one, since it didn't meet board guidelines.
My rant wasn't related to any women I have seen and reviewed here

Damn right, damn English language. At least it's not British English!

Thanks "dude" but where did I say she was Chubby?  Answer: I didn't.  I was simply saying that because he isn't a native English speaker, that something was probably lost in translation.  My guess is that he meant that she "wasn't all skin and bones" which is in fact a GOOD thing.

That's my point exactly...the low scores seem to be on the "looks" category.  One should have a pretty decent idea of what a provider looks like from her ad photos and only contact her if one believes she will be a good match.  "Beauty in the eye", etc.

Still amazed by the quality of photoshop. Some reviews I regret some I don't. Get over it.

Of course your original performance score didn't meet board guidelines, because you messed up and created a new profile instead of adding your review to Jenessa's existing profile.  Had you done that, your original performance score would not have been challenged by Admin.

Wrong.
Had to reduce performance from 9 to 8  Due to services performed.  Isnt adding reviews to existing providers the moderators job?

I never said I was disappointed in her looks. That's your interpretation.

This is what I said :Only one picture on BP is her. The rest is not her. Not sure, why she isn't using her own pictures. She is a very attractive MILF. I will repeat.

I would think someone with as many reviews as you have would know how the review system works.  My mistake.

Thank you for the information. Been a member since 2005 which equals to about 2 reviews per year. Sorry that I haven't taken the time to learn all the functionality. My bad.

I know they would have a field day trying to put a number to my ability and appearence. Is it possible to receive negative numbers in the rating?  

and when you report this to lower the scores, this is what happens....

So another review just popped up for the Sky - e girl and called her botox-y. It is like they either saw a different girl or think guys won't catch on. I can imagine what kind of discussion we will have on this one.

My Problem Report pointing out the duplicate Profile was marked 'N/A' by TER and the duplicate profile remains. And now a second review has been added to that new Profile, dated last November. It's one thing when a reviewer doesn't understand the system, but when TER doesn't understand, or care about, it's own rules ... kind of seems like a hatchet job on Jenessa.

http://youtu.be/W5yJvtM04VQ

I believe that N/A means that it is not "new," "approved" or "unapproved" yet, i.e., they are still researching.  Combining profiles (as was pointed out earlier by admin) takes some time to make sure they get it right.  I bet they are trying to contact Jenessa first, so  I wouldn't spend too much time worrying about it.

I first met Jenessa about 6 months ago and she was using 4 of the 5 pics from her BP ad of today on her website then. I think they absolutely are her (in my expert opinion, being a experienced, knowledgeable and thorough observer of Janessa) and are accurate to what she was a couple of months ago. I see her next week, so I'll let you know if she's changed. No, she's not a waif, but then, if she were, I never would have tried to see her. As you said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

After the mountain that was manufactured out something not even qualifying as a molehill in the first review, that comment, while unkind, will undoubtedly produce all sorts of apoplexy.

I've done that occasionally when problem reports get denied for no good reason and that usually gets things fixed.

Ha ha, good one, I remember that song. Lets forget about these long detailed reviews about what happens between two people alone and just put a number to them