Hi all,
Iâve been following this thread with interest because itâs a nuanced topic and I think some of the friction comes down to the fact that safety and screening mean different things to different people. Also, I was curious how it would play out.
Iâm trying to approach this conversation with more curiosity and less combustion, because ultimately, mutual respect is the only way any of this functions.
Obremt, I actually understand what you were trying to say. You werenât necessarily telling men not to screen, but rather to be thoughtful about what they share. *That said*, your phrasing does come across as resistance to screening, because for most of us, screening is the foundation of safety. Our processes arenât about collecting unnecessary personal details; theyâre about protecting both parties from unnecessary risk.
The reality is that everyoneâs comfort zone looks different. Clients should only share what feels right for them individually, and providers have every right to hold the boundaries that keep them safe. Where this goes sideways is when one personâs comfort level gets presented as universal truth (which is what happened here).
At the end of the day, this community only works if we can hold two truths at once: safety is non-negotiable, and privacy matters to each manâs comfort level. But that individual comfort level isnât a collective standard. And letâs be honest, many clients who say theyâd ânever share personal infoâ eventually do; theyâre just selective about who earns that trust (peers over my glasses).
Paige