Minnesota

and the twitter handle is suspened
Lennzi44 119 Reviews 2808 reads
posted
1 / 15

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/lilliah-lilly-arlette-363953

DickCurious 124 reads
posted
2 / 15

If it's a fake review to get the provider more business it should have been written with a more positive tone.

Tershirt 105 Reviews 143 reads
posted
3 / 15

Any time it’s a new provider and first time reviewer, it definitely raises a question mark for me.  

trainthetrainer1 65 Reviews 114 reads
posted
4 / 15

Agreed, the whole thing looks off.  

mnborn80 143 Reviews 130 reads
posted
5 / 15

She also requires a pic of your ID as well as a pic of yourself. No thanks.

vorlon 119 Reviews 109 reads
posted
6 / 15

On the one hand it is a first review of a provider being done by a first time reviewer, which is always a but suspicious.  On the other hand, a fake, shill review probably wouldn't talk about the communication problem; they are usually very positive.

wingman1346 85 Reviews 148 reads
posted
7 / 15

Twitter account is legit and provider with Jordan's rep says she's legit, she's legit.  Not my kind of screening requirements though.

OldRanger 62 Reviews 128 reads
posted
8 / 15

Thank you for substantiating she is real .  Has been awhile but in the past have turned the screening tables on an unreviewed provider by asking who she knew could vouch for her. Did twice and both times worked out well.

minnesotajohn 532 Reviews 136 reads
posted
9 / 15

I would NEVER see a NEW provider with one review by a NEW reviewer! I have other ways that I can use to vet new providers that would be better.  

Plus who talks like this:  "Afterwards, we had genital to genital sex with a condom" ???

Reference:
Review: Lilliah "Lilly" Arlette
TER ID: 363953

vorlon 119 Reviews 124 reads
posted
10 / 15
Nago8 4 Reviews 122 reads
posted
11 / 15
Guava.man.89 126 reads
posted
12 / 15

now everything gone. ter and twitter. sus sus sus.

3302667 24 Reviews 110 reads
posted
14 / 15

Of course another first time reviewer with BS like,
"Hobbyists, sorry I'm not going to go into the gritty particulars with our time together, because I feel that's private between people, even if it is in a provider-client relationship."

Okay, well then gtfo this board.

lockstock 229 Reviews 107 reads
posted
15 / 15

sounds like it was written by a woman. It's sort of strangely informative.

Register Now!