If it's a fake review to get the provider more business it should have been written with a more positive tone.

Any time it’s a new provider and first time reviewer, it definitely raises a question mark for me.  

Agreed, the whole thing looks off.  

She also requires a pic of your ID as well as a pic of yourself. No thanks.

On the one hand it is a first review of a provider being done by a first time reviewer, which is always a but suspicious.  On the other hand, a fake, shill review probably wouldn't talk about the communication problem; they are usually very positive.

Twitter account is legit and provider with Jordan's rep says she's legit, she's legit.  Not my kind of screening requirements though.

I would NEVER see a NEW provider with one review by a NEW reviewer! I have other ways that I can use to vet new providers that would be better.  

Plus who talks like this:  "Afterwards, we had genital to genital sex with a condom" ???

Reference:
Review: Lilliah "Lilly" Arlette
TER ID: 363953

now everything gone. ter and twitter. sus sus sus.

Of course another first time reviewer with BS like,
"Hobbyists, sorry I'm not going to go into the gritty particulars with our time together, because I feel that's private between people, even if it is in a provider-client relationship."

Okay, well then gtfo this board.